| To: | Henner Eisen <eis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: PPP over X |
| From: | Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Feb 2000 11:41:10 +1100 |
| Cc: | mostrows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxx, markster@xxxxxxxxx, mitch@xxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, marc@xxxxxxx, bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | Linuxcare, Inc. |
| References: | <200002092333.AAA05339@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Henner Eisen wrote: > Why not generalizing (essentially, it is just renaming) the paradigm > > 'attaching ppp channel to connected socket' > > to > > 'attaching/tunneling arbitray protocol over connected socket' Anyone for STREAMS??? Seriously, if you want any chance of Linus/Alan/DaveM etc. being interested, you have to show some specific actual thing that this would be good for. Just saying `this is a nice abstraction' will get you nowhere. -- Paul Mackerras, Senior Open Source Researcher, Linuxcare, Inc. +61 2 6262 8990 tel, +61 2 6262 8991 fax paulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.linuxcare.com.au/ Linuxcare. Support for the revolution. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Henner Eisen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Ole Husgaard |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Henner Eisen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Ole Husgaard |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |