| To: | Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: PPP over X |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Feb 2000 17:53:15 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | Henner Eisen <eis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxx, Mark Spencer <markster@xxxxxxxxx>, mitch@xxxxxxxxxx, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Marc Boucher <marc@xxxxxxx>, paulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ben LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <14496.38928.23657.403216@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Michal Ostrowski wrote: > So if you want to do PPP/UDP: > > socket(AF_INET,SOCK_PPP,IPPROTO_UDP); > > As the "type" suggests, you get PPP semantics. > There is a catch with this: You now have to muck with the UDP kernel code to add L2TP semantics; most other people would probably only want to use UDP as it is. cheers jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Admin address, Syd |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Paul Mackerras |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Michal Ostrowski |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Henner Eisen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |