| To: | Henner Eisen <eis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: PPP over X |
| From: | Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 7 Feb 2000 14:30:07 -0800 |
| Cc: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxx, Mark Spencer <markster@xxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Marc Boucher <marc@xxxxxxx>, paulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ben LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <ouemao6eqh.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from eis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 07:37:26PM +0100 |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.4.20.0002021030520.22723-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20000203120127.J72648@xxxxxxxxxx> <ouemao6eqh.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Henner Eisen wrote: > >>>>> "Mitchell" == Mitchell Blank <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Mitchell> ...PPTP, ISDN-PPP (is that using the new ppp_generic > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > No, isdn_ppp is the second oldest ppp implementation in the linux kernel > (since 1.3.x, don't know x by heart). That was long before ppp_generic > was available (2.3.x). Yes, but I was wondering if it had been updated to the ppp_generic regime. After all async PPP is older still and it uses ppp_generic now :-) BTW, sorry I didn't get around to posting patches to pppd yesterday. Every time I thought I nailed the "last thing" in pppd a couple more would pop up. I think I'm nearing the end of the tunnel though, so stay tuned. -Mitch |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Henner Eisen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Paul Mackerras |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Henner Eisen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Henner Eisen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |