netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: sin6_scope_id

To: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: sin6_scope_id
From: Philip Blundell <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:00:41 +0000
Cc: lordbeatnik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Message from Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@ISI.EDU> of "Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:32:07 PST." <xmsln5ouy6w.wl@orb.isi.edu>
References: <200001140114.RAA31198@ns1.filetron.com> <xmsln5ouy6w.wl@orb.isi.edu>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>BTW, in addition to introducing sin6_scope_id into kernel,
>I think we should intorduce it into glibc functions. It causes not
>less changes into kernel and glibc.
>Is there anyone who is a developper of glibc in this mailing list ? 

Yes.  I agree; it would be fairly futile to introduce sin6_scope_id into the 
kernel without having matching changes in glibc.

p.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>