netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: two ipv6 oops on 2.3.31

To: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: two ipv6 oops on 2.3.31
From: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 22:18:56 +0900
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: venaas@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: In your message of "Wed, 29 Dec 1999 18:29:35 +0100" <19991229182935.J10337@wiget>
Organization: Information Sciences Institute
References: <199912150024.QAA06037@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <199912151501.SAA02381@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19991229182935.J10337@wiget>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.2.12 (Joyride) SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta19) (Shinjuku) (i586-pc-linux)
At Wed, 29 Dec 1999 18:29:35 +0100,
Artur Frysiak <wiget@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello,

> Alexey, Why this patch don't go to main kernel source ?
> I check 2.3.35 and this problem is not fixed.
> With this patch IPv6 work fine.

And how about this patch, Alexey ?
This patch made by <venaas@xxxxxxxxxxx> solves 
ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG problem.

--- tcp_ipv6.c.orig     Thu Aug 26 02:29:53 1999
+++ tcp_ipv6.c  Sun Oct 31 00:59:31 1999
@@ -632,7 +632,6 @@
                if (dst == NULL) {
                        struct flowi fl;
-                       struct dst_entry *dst;
                        /* BUGGG_FUTURE: Again, it is not clear how
                           to handle rthdr case. Ignore this complexity


-- 
SEKIYA Yuji     USC/ISI  Computer Networks Division 7
<sekiya@xxxxxxx / sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx / sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>