| To: | Guilhem.Tardy@xxxxxx (Guilhem Tardy) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: DestOpts: are they implemented? |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sun, 12 Dec 1999 18:53:49 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <38516875.6363A31E@xxxxxx> from "Guilhem Tardy" at Dec 10, 99 03:54:13 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > My understanding is that IPv6 does not have Dest Opts aside of PAD1 and > PADN, right? Exactly, no more standard options exist. A particular module may add its own ones, if it is required. > 2.3.x later on). I am just trying to figure out the best way to do it, > as the Linux IPv6 implementation was real short at the time of 2.1.59 > and solutions change with the new situation. Mmm... To be honest, there were not so much of changes since that time. No structural changes at least, mainly filling holes. > Note that I would be interested in a URL for the development IPv6 > stack... You are listening this URL now 8) (i.e. netdev) Alexey Kuznetsov |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 'memory_start' in init/main.c, Richard Gooch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [no subject], Andreas Thorstensson |
| Previous by Thread: | DestOpts: are they implemented?, Guilhem Tardy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Destination Options (see at the end of message), mingliang jiang |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |