| To: | Paul.Russell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Paul Rusty Russell) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Suppressing ICMP redirects for mangled packets? |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Nov 1999 19:01:57 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <m11lJ4V-000CIVC@localhost> from "Paul Rusty Russell" at Nov 10, 99 08:44:57 am |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > Is it reasonable to suppress ICMP redirects in this case? > There are cases where we want to route through a box for special > effects: most common is the where we're NATing 1.2.3.1 onto > 192.168.1.1, and a box on 192.168.1.* connects to 1.2.3.1. The solution is hack in the purest form. 8) Why not to make it cleanly in spirit of ip_masquearade_icmp? netfilter has to rewrite ICMP consistently in any case and parsing redirects does not add anything new, does it? Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ANSI C++ problem in include/linux/socket.h, dancer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | dqpsk, Andres Benitez |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] Suppressing ICMP redirects for mangled packets?, Paul Rusty Russell |
| Next by Thread: | dqpsk, Andres Benitez |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |