From bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Sun Mar 1 02:48:31 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_63 autolearn=no version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n218mUgq146312 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 02:48:31 -0600 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1235897281-50af02320000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 13ACD1C0A3DC for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 00:48:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.13]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Oou0nhmjMluKFMxm for ; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:48:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from picon.linux-foundation.org (picon.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.79]) by smtp1.linux-foundation.org (8.14.2/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id n218lSNG001803 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 00:47:29 -0800 Received: by picon.linux-foundation.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 6E8EE108040; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 00:47:28 -0800 (PST) X-ASG-Orig-Subj: [Bug 12781] FREEZE/THAW compat_ioctl regression Subject: [Bug 12781] FREEZE/THAW compat_ioctl regression In-Reply-To: X-Bugzilla-Product: File System X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com From: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Message-Id: <20090301084728.6E8EE108040@picon.linux-foundation.org> Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 00:47:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: none (domain of bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-MIMEDefang-Filter: lf$Revision: 1.188 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 140.211.169.13 X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp1.linux-foundation.org[140.211.169.13] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1235897282 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.19150 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12781 rjw@sisk.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CODE_FIX ------- Comment #1 from rjw@sisk.pl 2009-03-01 00:47 ------- Fixed by: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5cf8cf4146de03de67d1a8aefbece66b65f255cc -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Sun Mar 1 04:50:09 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n21Ao9Ci151242 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 04:50:09 -0600 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n21Ao9gT151240; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 04:50:09 -0600 Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 04:50:09 -0600 Message-Id: <200903011050.n21Ao9gT151240@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 815] [patch] Misspelling in xfsprogs string - 'prefered' X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: xfsprogs X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: trivial X-Bugzilla-Who: malcolm.parsons@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=815 --- Comment #4 from Malcolm Parsons 2009-03-01 04:50:06 CST --- Subject: [PATCH] Fix various typos. Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:46:25 +0000 Message-Id: <1235821585-11998-2-git-send-email-malcolm.parsons@gmail.com> ... doesn't seem to have made it to the list. -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Sun Mar 1 06:11:42 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n21CBgwK156426 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 06:11:42 -0600 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n21CBgWH156425; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 06:11:42 -0600 Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 06:11:42 -0600 From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 816] New: xfs_qm_dqcheck oops in 2.6.28.7 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS kernel code X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: arekm@maven.pl X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=816 Summary: xfs_qm_dqcheck oops in 2.6.28.7 Product: XFS Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: XFS kernel code AssignedTo: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com ReportedBy: arekm@maven.pl Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Unclassified Quite often when I get into a trouble with my server (like hangs or something) after a reboot xfs oopses and I quite often see xfs_qm_dqcheck as function where it oopsed. xfs_repair works but only if used with -L. Normal mount to recover log always oops like this: [ 174.333651] Filesystem "dm-0": Disabling barriers, trial barrier write failed [ 174.341055] XFS mounting filesystem dm-0 [ 175.803855] Starting XFS recovery on filesystem: dm-0 (logdev: internal) [ 176.496821] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffffffffffc00 [ 176.500091] IP: [] xfs_qm_dqcheck+0x96a/0x21d0 [xfs] [ 176.500091] PGD 547067 PUD 549067 PMD 0 [ 176.500091] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP [ 176.500091] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/0000:01:00.0/0000:02:02.0/0000:05:00.1/irq [ 176.500091] CPU 4 [ 176.500091] Modules linked in: ipmi_watchdog netconsole configfs sit tunnel4 sch_sfq ext3 jbd mbcache raid456 async_xor async_memcpy async_tx xor raid1 dm_mod e1000 e1000e ipmi_devintf ipmi_si ipmi_msghandler 8021q garp stp xfs scsi_wait_scan sd_mod crc_t10dif mptsas mptscsih mptbase scsi_transport_sas scsi_mod raid10 md_mod [ 176.500091] Pid: 3112, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.28.7-1 #1 [ 176.500091] RIP: 0010:[] [] xfs_qm_dqcheck+0x96a/0x21d0 [xfs] [ 176.500091] RSP: 0018:ffff88015214fa58 EFLAGS: 00010256 [ 176.500091] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8801520f7b00 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 176.500091] RDX: fffffffffffffc00 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: fffffffffffffc00 [ 176.500091] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffffffffffc00 [ 176.500091] R10: ffff880154d64a00 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8801520f7940 [ 176.500091] R13: ffff8801520f78c0 R14: 0000000000001000 R15: ffff880152036000 [ 176.500091] FS: 00007ff0454647d0(0000) GS:ffff88015fa4c880(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 176.500091] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [ 176.890405] CR2: fffffffffffffc00 CR3: 0000000155931000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 176.900403] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 176.900403] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 176.900403] Process mount (pid: 3112, threadinfo ffff88015214e000, task ffff88015e1b86d0) [ 176.900403] Stack: [ 176.900403] ffff8801520f78c0 000000005d9b6a28 ffff88015214fbd8 ffffc20011820fa4 [ 176.900403] ffffc20011820fb0 0000000000000004 ffffc20011823e00 ffffffffa01034dc [ 176.900403] 000000000002979a 0000000152d77000 ffff880152d77000 ffff88015214fb88 [ 176.900403] Call Trace: [ 176.900403] [] xfs_qm_dqcheck+0x1fec/0x21d0 [xfs] [ 176.900403] [] xlog_get_bp+0x1e9/0x1760 [xfs] [ 176.900403] [] xfs_dir_file_operations+0x2210/0xe886 [xfs] [ 176.900403] [] xlog_get_bp+0x7f7/0x1760 [xfs] [ 176.900403] [] xlog_get_bp+0x85a/0x1760 [xfs] [ 176.900403] [] xlog_recover+0x7a/0x90 [xfs] [ 176.900403] [] xfs_log_mount+0xa6/0xd30 [xfs] [ 176.900403] [] xfs_mountfs+0x33b/0x680 [xfs] [ 176.900403] [] xfs_filestream_lookup_ag+0x60/0x4e0 [xfs] [ 176.900403] [] kmem_zalloc+0x2b/0x40 [xfs] [ 176.900403] [] xfs_mru_cache_create+0x137/0x170 [xfs] [ 176.900403] [] xfs_blkdev_get+0x492/0x660 [xfs] [ 176.900403] [] get_sb_bdev+0x174/0x1a0 [ 176.900403] [] xfs_blkdev_get+0x230/0x660 [xfs] [ 176.900403] [] kstrdup+0x54/0x70 [ 176.900403] [] vfs_kern_mount+0x86/0x250 [ 176.900403] [] do_kern_mount+0x53/0x120 [ 176.900403] [] do_mount+0x2ed/0xa50 [ 176.900403] [] sys_mount+0xf9/0x110 [ 176.900403] [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 176.900403] Code: 49 8b 54 24 08 8b 42 18 85 c0 75 65 49 8b 45 28 48 8b 58 08 8b 6b 18 85 ed 0f 84 92 00 00 00 48 63 43 14 48 8b 53 20 48 c1 e0 04 <4c> 89 3c 02 48 63 43 14 48 8b 53 20 48 c1 e0 04 44 89 74 02 08 [ 176.900403] RIP [] xfs_qm_dqcheck+0x96a/0x21d0 [xfs] [ 176.900403] RSP [ 176.900403] CR2: fffffffffffffc00 [ 176.900403] ---[ end trace 0f88ebfbe4e5aa3b ]--- -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Sun Mar 1 06:19:01 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n21CJ1QE156960 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 06:19:01 -0600 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n21CJ1Jr156959; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 06:19:01 -0600 Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 06:19:01 -0600 Message-Id: <200903011219.n21CJ1Jr156959@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 816] xfs_qm_dqcheck oops in 2.6.28.7 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS kernel code X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: arekm@maven.pl X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=816 --- Comment #1 from Arkadiusz Miskiewicz 2009-03-01 06:19:00 CST --- xfs_logprint -C dump http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~arekm/xfslog.bz2 (too big to attach to bugzilla) -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Sun Mar 1 10:04:47 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n21G4l6L165334 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:04:47 -0600 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n21G4l9F165333; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:04:47 -0600 Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:04:47 -0600 Message-Id: <200903011604.n21G4l9F165333@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 816] xfs_qm_dqcheck oops in 2.6.28.7 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS kernel code X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: arekm@maven.pl X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=816 --- Comment #2 from Arkadiusz Miskiewicz 2009-03-01 10:04:46 CST --- xfs_info for that fs: meta-data=/dev/mapper/vg_sys-lv_home isize=256 agcount=32, agsize=6553600 blks = sectsz=512 attr=1 data = bsize=4096 blocks=209715200, imaxpct=25 = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0 log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=1 = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0 realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0 -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Sun Mar 1 10:05:31 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n21G5VF0165373 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:05:31 -0600 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n21G5VRR165372; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:05:31 -0600 Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:05:31 -0600 Message-Id: <200903011605.n21G5VRR165372@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 816] xfs_qm_dqcheck oops in 2.6.28.7 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS kernel code X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: sandeen-xfs@sandeen.net X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=816 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sandeen-xfs@sandeen.net --- Comment #3 from Eric Sandeen 2009-03-01 10:05:23 CST --- fs geometry for that log dump: meta-data=/dev/mapper/vg_sys-lv_home isize=256 agcount=32, agsize=6553600 blks = sectsz=512 attr=1 data = bsize=4096 blocks=209715200, imaxpct=25 = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0 log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=1 = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0 realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0 -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Tue Mar 3 09:25:46 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n23FPkoO019579 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:25:46 -0600 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n23FPk9C019578; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:25:46 -0600 Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:25:46 -0600 Message-Id: <200903031525.n23FPk9C019578@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 815] [patch] Misspelling in xfsprogs string - 'prefered' X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: xfsprogs X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: trivial X-Bugzilla-Who: hch@xfs.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=815 Christoph Hellwig changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cattelan@xfs.org --- Comment #5 from Christoph Hellwig 2009-03-03 09:25:42 CST --- Looks like the mail setup is botched either at your or (more likely) the oss.sgi.com end. Just attach the patch in the proper format with header, description and signed-off line here and I'll put it in. -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Tue Mar 3 09:37:56 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n23FbudX020123 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:37:56 -0600 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n23Fbu0h020122; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:37:56 -0600 Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:37:56 -0600 Message-Id: <200903031537.n23Fbu0h020122@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 815] [patch] Misspelling in xfsprogs string - 'prefered' X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: xfsprogs X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: trivial X-Bugzilla-Who: malcolm.parsons@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=815 --- Comment #6 from Malcolm Parsons 2009-03-03 09:37:52 CST --- Created an attachment (id=260) --> (http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=260) Fix various typos -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Tue Mar 3 09:48:15 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n23FmFu5020732 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:48:15 -0600 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n23FmFEM020730; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:48:15 -0600 Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:48:15 -0600 Message-Id: <200903031548.n23FmFEM020730@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 815] [patch] Misspelling in xfsprogs string - 'prefered' X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: xfsprogs X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: trivial X-Bugzilla-Who: hch@xfs.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=815 Christoph Hellwig changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Christoph Hellwig 2009-03-03 09:48:12 CST --- Thanks, I've put the patch in. I did however skip the hunk for libxfs/xfs_bmap.c. That file lives in the kernel source and gets resynced into libxfs. I can either put that hunk into the kernel tree, or if you're interested in going on a hunt for spelling errors under fs/xfs/ in the kernel tree I can wait for a bigger patch. -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Tue Mar 3 16:13:30 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n23MDU6h037920 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 16:13:30 -0600 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n23MDUkx037919; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 16:13:30 -0600 Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 16:13:30 -0600 Message-Id: <200903032213.n23MDUkx037919@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 815] [patch] Misspelling in xfsprogs string - 'prefered' X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: xfsprogs X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: trivial X-Bugzilla-Who: malcolm.parsons@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=815 --- Comment #8 from Malcolm Parsons 2009-03-03 16:13:26 CST --- Created an attachment (id=261) --> (http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=261) Fix various typos in xfs kernel source I've mailed this to the list and to Christoph, but am attaching it here just in case. -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp Tue Mar 3 20:53:58 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n242ruDb048010 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 20:53:58 -0600 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1236135208-364a025c0000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 4DEC716CBC9; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 18:53:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp (serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp [222.151.198.100]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Zs3n6hOx4W395vwl; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:53:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1E0248154; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:53:26 +0900 (JST) Received: from serv1.oss.ntt.co.jp (serv1.localdomain [172.19.0.2]) by serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB45824814D; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:53:26 +0900 (JST) Received: from hifumi-PC.oss.ntt.co.jp (unknown [172.17.1.17]) by serv1.oss.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F6B104165; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:53:26 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <6.0.0.20.2.20090304114824.06985898@172.19.0.2> X-Sender: hhifumi@172.19.0.2 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6J-Jr3 Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:50:06 +0900 To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com From: Hisashi Hifumi X-ASG-Orig-Subj: [PATCH] XFS: Pagecache usage optimization on XFS Subject: [PATCH] XFS: Pagecache usage optimization on XFS Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Barracuda-Connect: serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp[222.151.198.100] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1236135210 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.19375 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Hi. I introduced "is_partially_uptodate" aops for XFS. A page can have multiple buffers and even if a page is not uptodate, some buffers can be uptodate on pagesize != blocksize environment. This aops checks that all buffers which correspond to a part of a file that we want to read are uptodate. If so, we do not have to issue actual read IO to HDD even if a page is not uptodate because the portion we want to read are uptodate. "block_is_partially_uptodate" function is already used by ext2/3/4. With the following patch random read/write mixed workloads or random read after random write workloads can be optimized and we can get performance improvement. I did a performance test using the sysbench. #sysbench --num-threads=4 --max-requests=100000 --test=fileio --file-num=1 --file-block-size=8K --file-total-size=1G --file-test-mode=rndrw --file-fsync-freq=0 --file-rw-ratio=0.5 run -2.6.29-rc6 Test execution summary: total time: 123.8645s total number of events: 100000 total time taken by event execution: 442.4994 per-request statistics: min: 0.0000s avg: 0.0044s max: 0.3387s approx. 95 percentile: 0.0118s -2.6.29-rc6-patched Test execution summary: total time: 108.0757s total number of events: 100000 total time taken by event execution: 417.7505 per-request statistics: min: 0.0000s avg: 0.0042s max: 0.3217s approx. 95 percentile: 0.0118s arch: ia64 pagesize: 16k blocksize: 4k Please merge following patch. Thanks. Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi diff -Nrup linux-2.6.29-rc6.org/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c linux-2.6.29-rc6.xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c --- linux-2.6.29-rc6.org/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c 2009-03-02 09:26:08.000000000 +0900 +++ linux-2.6.29-rc6.xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c 2009-03-04 10:26:21.000000000 +0900 @@ -1623,4 +1623,5 @@ const struct address_space_operations xf .bmap = xfs_vm_bmap, .direct_IO = xfs_vm_direct_IO, .migratepage = buffer_migrate_page, + .is_partially_uptodate = block_is_partially_uptodate, }; From aisha.hani@up-uk.com Sun Mar 8 12:50:24 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n28HoNm7093504 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2009 12:50:23 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1236534593-17f801030000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from windows6.internet-webhosting.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 72A601C27803; Sun, 8 Mar 2009 10:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from windows6.internet-webhosting.com (Win6.internet-webhosting.com [202.75.36.46]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id K4SdsD2jnW6vlVmj; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 10:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by windows6.internet-webhosting.com with MailEnable ESMTP; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:24:56 +0800 Received: from 60.52.97.78 ([60.52.97.78]) by webmail.up-uk.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:24:53 +0800 Message-ID: <20090309012453.8123sxp2s8cwc048@webmail.up-uk.com> Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:24:53 +0800 From: aisha.hani@up-uk.com To: undisclosed-recipients:; X-ASG-Orig-Subj: please reply Subject: please reply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.6) X-Barracuda-Connect: Win6.internet-webhosting.com[202.75.36.46] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1236534598 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.6587 1.0000 1.0772 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 1.08 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=1.08 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.19778 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean HI I know you will be surprise to read from someone relatively unknown to =20 you. My name is Miss. Aisha Hani Abdullah. Before now, I must say that =20 I am very uncomfortable sending this message to you without knowing =20 truly if you misconstrue the importance and secrecy of this deal and =20 decide to go public which will affect my carrier and the future of =20 this deal. I feel safe sending you this business proposal, having gone through =20 your contact on the Internet, even though this medium (Internet) has =20 been greatly abused, I choose to reach you through this medium =20 because it still remain the surest and above all, the most secured =20 medium of communication. My company wants a product called (SAPHIRE BLUE STONE). It's used for =20 jewelries, necklace, wrist watch, marble ties etc. The only original =20 supplier of these MINERAL is in Malaysia. As such; my company needs =20 not less than one hundred to two hundred kg. Since you are in =20 Malaysia, I would you to handle this business. Please contact me via email, should you accept this offer: =20 (aisha_hani@up-uk.com) Regards Aisha Hani ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From xfs-master@oss.sgi.com Mon Mar 9 13:07:10 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n29I79Ox152256 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:07:09 -0500 Received: (from xfs-master@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n29I79ad152253 for xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:07:09 -0500 Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n29I78IK152239 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:07:08 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1236621999-0c8700570000-lnlpjA X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from windows6.internet-webhosting.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id E4A461C2B2DB; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:06:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from windows6.internet-webhosting.com (Win6.internet-webhosting.com [202.75.36.46]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 5qTCHbe0RIgDRXlc; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:06:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by windows6.internet-webhosting.com with MailEnable ESMTP; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:36:39 +0800 Received: from 60.52.97.78 ([60.52.97.78]) by webmail.up-uk.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:36:37 +0800 Message-ID: <20090309013637.x3ii8w6uoo0skckg@webmail.up-uk.com> Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:36:37 +0800 From: aisha.hani@up-uk.com To: undisclosed-recipients:; X-ASG-Orig-Subj: please reply Subject: please reply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.6) X-Barracuda-Connect: Win6.internet-webhosting.com[202.75.36.46] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1236622003 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.6587 1.0000 1.0772 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 1.08 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=1.08 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.19868 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean HI I know you will be surprise to read from someone relatively unknown to =20 you. My name is Miss. Aisha Hani Abdullah. Before now, I must say that =20 I am very uncomfortable sending this message to you without knowing =20 truly if you misconstrue the importance and secrecy of this deal and =20 decide to go public which will affect my carrier and the future of =20 this deal. I feel safe sending you this business proposal, having gone through =20 your contact on the Internet, even though this medium (Internet) has =20 been greatly abused, I choose to reach you through this medium =20 because it still remain the surest and above all, the most secured =20 medium of communication. My company wants a product called (SAPHIRE BLUE STONE). It's used for =20 jewelries, necklace, wrist watch, marble ties etc. The only original =20 supplier of these MINERAL is in Malaysia. As such; my company needs =20 not less than one hundred to two hundred kg. Since you are in =20 Malaysia, I would you to handle this business. Please contact me via email, should you accept this offer: =20 (aisha_hani@up-uk.com) Regards Aisha Hani ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From aisha.hani@up-uk.com Mon Mar 9 13:36:36 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n29IaZLS154087 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:36:36 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1236623766-269f005e0000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from windows6.internet-webhosting.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id CDAB61C2B2C9 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from windows6.internet-webhosting.com (Win6.internet-webhosting.com [202.75.36.46]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 90zx7zlyJjHs50ka for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by windows6.internet-webhosting.com with MailEnable ESMTP; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:06:06 +0800 Received: from 60.52.97.78 ([60.52.97.78]) by webmail.up-uk.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:06:05 +0800 Message-ID: <20090309020605.0sbl9u8zy80owk4g@webmail.up-uk.com> Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:06:05 +0800 From: aisha.hani@up-uk.com To: undisclosed-recipients:; X-ASG-Orig-Subj: please reply Subject: please reply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.6) X-Barracuda-Connect: Win6.internet-webhosting.com[202.75.36.46] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1236623771 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.6587 1.0000 1.0772 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 1.08 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=1.08 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.19870 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean HI I know you will be surprise to read from someone relatively unknown to =20 you. My name is Miss. Aisha Hani Abdullah. Before now, I must say that =20 I am very uncomfortable sending this message to you without knowing =20 truly if you misconstrue the importance and secrecy of this deal and =20 decide to go public which will affect my carrier and the future of =20 this deal. I feel safe sending you this business proposal, having gone through =20 your contact on the Internet, even though this medium (Internet) has =20 been greatly abused, I choose to reach you through this medium =20 because it still remain the surest and above all, the most secured =20 medium of communication. My company wants a product called (SAPHIRE BLUE STONE). It's used for =20 jewelries, necklace, wrist watch, marble ties etc. The only original =20 supplier of these MINERAL is in Malaysia. As such; my company needs =20 not less than one hundred to two hundred kg. Since you are in =20 Malaysia, I would you to handle this business. Please contact me via email, should you accept this offer: =20 (aisha_hani@up-uk.com) Regards Aisha Hani ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From sfr@canb.auug.org.au Mon Mar 9 21:46:22 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2A2kL21175745 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 21:46:22 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1236653154-697b02b10000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from smtps.tip.net.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 527591C2CDC2 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 19:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtps.tip.net.au (chilli.pcug.org.au [203.10.76.44]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id WfGWw1EN547WrIyy for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ash.ozlabs.ibm.com (bh02i525f01.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtps.tip.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87CD0368005; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:45:52 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:45:47 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: David Chinner , xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org X-ASG-Orig-Subj: linux-next: xfs tree build failure Subject: linux-next: xfs tree build failure Message-Id: <20090310134547.e5d1d9ee.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__10_Mar_2009_13_45_47_+1100_vGk340DGPWOWXAwU" X-Barracuda-Connect: chilli.pcug.org.au[203.10.76.44] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1236653157 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.19901 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean --Signature=_Tue__10_Mar_2009_13_45_47_+1100_vGk340DGPWOWXAwU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi David, Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: In file included from fs/xfs/support/debug.c:21: fs/xfs/xfs_error.h:137: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' bef= ore 'xfs_mount_t' fs/xfs/xfs_error.h:138: error: expected ')' before '*' token Immediate cause is commit 7bf446f8b581cef434f5ff05e8a791563bc09b7f ("xfs: include header files for prototypes"). I have merged the version of the xfs tree from next-20090306 instead of today's. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Tue__10_Mar_2009_13_45_47_+1100_vGk340DGPWOWXAwU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkm11FsACgkQjjKRsyhoI8wtbQCfco4khnWcx4yq611kbzcr58jH oRcAnj9dFHqV5O1HprN45MtSwEmYgOLl =O2+B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__10_Mar_2009_13_45_47_+1100_vGk340DGPWOWXAwU-- From david@fromorbit.com Wed Mar 11 17:58:42 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2BMwLnG035736 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:58:42 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1236812277-35b803c10000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 1B52918D028 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:57:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.57]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 81w9owgn3YCxOsyR for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:57:58 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAOjdt0l5LAOZ/2dsb2JhbADSBYQNBg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,346,1233495000"; d="scan'208";a="326391419" Received: from ppp121-44-3-153.lns10.syd7.internode.on.net (HELO disturbed) ([121.44.3.153]) by ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2009 09:22:13 +1030 Received: from dave by disturbed with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LhXHY-000778-5d; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:52:12 +1100 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:52:12 +1100 From: Dave Chinner To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: linux-next: xfs tree build failure Subject: Re: linux-next: xfs tree build failure Message-ID: <20090311225212.GN26138@disturbed> Mail-Followup-To: Stephen Rothwell , xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org References: <20090310134547.e5d1d9ee.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090310134547.e5d1d9ee.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Barracuda-Connect: ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net[203.16.214.57] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1236812279 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.20055 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:45:47PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi David, > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from fs/xfs/support/debug.c:21: > fs/xfs/xfs_error.h:137: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'xfs_mount_t' > fs/xfs/xfs_error.h:138: error: expected ')' before '*' token > > Immediate cause is commit 7bf446f8b581cef434f5ff05e8a791563bc09b7f ("xfs: > include header files for prototypes"). Obviously nobody built this on a CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG=y kernel before pushing it. Moving the xfs_error.h include down below all the other includes (i.e after xfs_mount.h) will fix the problem.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com From sfr@canb.auug.org.au Wed Mar 11 20:05:35 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2C15Eo2042211 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:05:34 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1236819888-65bf019c0000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from smtps.tip.net.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id CEFEC1C36927 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:04:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtps.tip.net.au (chilli.pcug.org.au [203.10.76.44]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id DusnZw7GaN4qzWHe for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:04:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ash.ozlabs.ibm.com (bh02i525f01.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtps.tip.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8C0E144058; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:04:46 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:04:41 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: David Chinner , xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: linux-next: xfs tree build failure Subject: Re: linux-next: xfs tree build failure Message-Id: <20090312120441.b9839805.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20090310134547.e5d1d9ee.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20090310134547.e5d1d9ee.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__12_Mar_2009_12_04_41_+1100_DGaPqNV9gMWEFCLO" X-Barracuda-Connect: chilli.pcug.org.au[203.10.76.44] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1236819889 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.20074 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean --Signature=_Thu__12_Mar_2009_12_04_41_+1100_DGaPqNV9gMWEFCLO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi David, On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:45:47 +1100 Stephen Rothwell = wrote: > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: >=20 > In file included from fs/xfs/support/debug.c:21: > fs/xfs/xfs_error.h:137: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' b= efore 'xfs_mount_t' > fs/xfs/xfs_error.h:138: error: expected ')' before '*' token This is still happening. Looking at the preprocessed output. xfs_mount_t is not defined yet, so either fs/xfs/xfs_error.h needs to include xfs_mount.h (in the DEBUG case) or xfs_errortag_add and xfs_errortag_clearall need to use "struct xfs_mount" as their paramaters instead of xfs_mount_t (and predeclare "struct xfs_mount"). --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Thu__12_Mar_2009_12_04_41_+1100_DGaPqNV9gMWEFCLO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkm4X6kACgkQjjKRsyhoI8za8QCeM5bfIFaAVCjonk42C+Gm1/iu frUAn19xMwClvDxLf2fTQs33KU8DPa5o =kqxc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__12_Mar_2009_12_04_41_+1100_DGaPqNV9gMWEFCLO-- From david@fromorbit.com Sun Mar 15 07:19:14 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2FCIqEu010418 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:19:14 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1237119509-735401370000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 2DD531C43599 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:18:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id qFXlTSQbwt7o5rMV for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:18:30 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEALuMvEl5LAJ7/2dsb2JhbADQIIN/Bg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,365,1233495000"; d="scan'208";a="338993933" Received: from ppp121-44-2-123.lns10.syd7.internode.on.net (HELO disturbed) ([121.44.2.123]) by ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 15 Mar 2009 22:48:28 +1030 Received: from dave by disturbed with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LipIQ-0006n9-43; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:18:26 +1100 Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:18:26 +1100 From: Dave Chinner To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: linux-next: xfs tree build failure Subject: Re: linux-next: xfs tree build failure Message-ID: <20090315121826.GA25955@disturbed> Mail-Followup-To: Stephen Rothwell , xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org References: <20090310134547.e5d1d9ee.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090312120441.b9839805.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090312120441.b9839805.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Barracuda-Connect: ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net[203.16.214.145] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1237119511 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.20399 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:04:41PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi David, > > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:45:47 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > In file included from fs/xfs/support/debug.c:21: > > fs/xfs/xfs_error.h:137: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'xfs_mount_t' > > fs/xfs/xfs_error.h:138: error: expected ')' before '*' token > > This is still happening. Yes, there is a reviewed patch that doesn't appear to have been checked into the tree yet.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com From sfr@canb.auug.org.au Sun Mar 15 09:08:25 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2FE84GO015748 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:08:25 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1237126041-68a3005e0000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from smtps.tip.net.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 402D419A2A2 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtps.tip.net.au (chilli.pcug.org.au [203.10.76.44]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id XKVoDFHwsAl3hlKu for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ash.ozlabs.ibm.com (ta-1-1.tip.net.au [203.11.71.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtps.tip.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E694368007; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:07:19 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:07:14 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Felix Blyakher Cc: Dave Chinner , xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: xfs tree build failure Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: xfs tree build failure Message-Id: <20090316010714.3680256d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <0F2D1207-4AC7-4FB7-9E74-8D8BA1379279@sgi.com> References: <20090310134547.e5d1d9ee.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090312120441.b9839805.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090315121826.GA25955@disturbed> <0F2D1207-4AC7-4FB7-9E74-8D8BA1379279@sgi.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__16_Mar_2009_01_07_14_+1100_l.AICBqPh.c36/5T" X-Barracuda-Connect: chilli.pcug.org.au[203.10.76.44] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1237126063 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.20407 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean --Signature=_Mon__16_Mar_2009_01_07_14_+1100_l.AICBqPh.c36/5T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 08:33:46 -0500 Felix Blyakher wrote: > > Checked in now. Great, thanks. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Mon__16_Mar_2009_01_07_14_+1100_l.AICBqPh.c36/5T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkm9C5IACgkQjjKRsyhoI8zs5gCgrPICdQpiQIAcUEDXO/i6w3yr Tj4AoJo0TkKc+PYdFZr6oDoECRBM1C4C =s1qQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__16_Mar_2009_01_07_14_+1100_l.AICBqPh.c36/5T-- From felixb@sgi.com Sun Mar 15 09:37:51 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2FEbTfv017334 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:37:50 -0500 Received: from estes.americas.sgi.com (estes.americas.sgi.com [128.162.236.10]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA308F8087 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:37:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [IPv6???1] (sshgate.corp.sgi.com [198.149.20.12]) by estes.americas.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203777000103; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 08:33:49 -0500 (CDT) Cc: Stephen Rothwell , xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <0F2D1207-4AC7-4FB7-9E74-8D8BA1379279@sgi.com> From: Felix Blyakher To: Dave Chinner In-Reply-To: <20090315121826.GA25955@disturbed> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: xfs tree build failure Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 08:33:46 -0500 References: <20090310134547.e5d1d9ee.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090312120441.b9839805.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090315121826.GA25955@disturbed> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean On Mar 15, 2009, at 7:18 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:04:41PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:45:47 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: >>> >>> Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: >>> >>> In file included from fs/xfs/support/debug.c:21: >>> fs/xfs/xfs_error.h:137: error: expected declaration specifiers or >>> '...' before 'xfs_mount_t' >>> fs/xfs/xfs_error.h:138: error: expected ')' before '*' token >> >> This is still happening. > > Yes, there is a reviewed patch that doesn't appear to have been > checked into the tree yet.... Checked in now. Thanks for reporting it. Felix From SRS0+bb5643a01525f31165fd+2031+infradead.org+hch@bombadil.srs.infradead.org Mon Mar 16 04:17:09 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2G9GntC081349 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 04:17:09 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1237194967-670400f10000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 2A9391C45BE6; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:16:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id FUiqHuEBvgCNm4qu; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:16:07 -0700 (PDT) X-ASG-Whitelist: Client Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Lj8vW-00017d-F0; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:16:06 +0000 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:16:06 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Hisashi Hifumi Cc: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [PATCH] XFS: Pagecache usage optimization on XFS Subject: Re: [PATCH] XFS: Pagecache usage optimization on XFS Message-ID: <20090316091606.GA1720@infradead.org> References: <6.0.0.20.2.20090304114824.06985898@172.19.0.2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.20.2.20090304114824.06985898@172.19.0.2> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-Barracuda-Connect: bombadil.infradead.org[18.85.46.34] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1237194988 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean This looks like it should work. did you run XFSQA on a small blocksize filesystem with this applied? From hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp Mon Mar 16 23:07:49 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2H47SQp133378 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:07:49 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1237262806-5cd500d80000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 40A9C1A09F0; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:06:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp (serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp [222.151.198.100]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id v1PcqB5f3FCIWOWf; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:06:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB6E2480CE; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:06:44 +0900 (JST) Received: from serv1.oss.ntt.co.jp (serv1.localdomain [172.19.0.2]) by serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC152480CB; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:06:44 +0900 (JST) Received: from hifumi-PC.oss.ntt.co.jp (unknown [172.17.1.20]) by serv1.oss.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88B3104165; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:06:42 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <6.0.0.20.2.20090317102134.06e60b30@172.19.0.2> X-Sender: hhifumi@172.19.0.2 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6J-Jr3 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:03:08 +0900 To: Christoph Hellwig From: Hisashi Hifumi X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [PATCH] XFS: Pagecache usage optimization on XFS Subject: Re: [PATCH] XFS: Pagecache usage optimization on XFS Cc: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com In-Reply-To: <20090316091606.GA1720@infradead.org> References: <6.0.0.20.2.20090304114824.06985898@172.19.0.2> <20090316091606.GA1720@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Barracuda-Connect: serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp[222.151.198.100] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1237262828 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-ASG-Whitelist: BODY (http://marc\.info/\?) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean At 18:16 09/03/16, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >This looks like it should work. did you run XFSQA on a small blocksize >filesystem with this applied? Hi. I did XFSQA test on XFS partition with this patch applied. arch:ia64 pagesize:16K blocksize:2K The result of XFSQA test 001~ 202 except 182 was OK. It was discussed about the failure of test 182 as follows. http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=122535673232638&w=2 Subject: do_sync() and XFSQA test 182 failures.... From SRS0+326e7d8f0257c4878c57+2032+infradead.org+hch@bombadil.srs.infradead.org Tue Mar 17 01:43:13 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2H6gqgO143126 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:43:13 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1237272151-1e23012f0000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id E1A541A0C31; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:42:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id DpRxn7bwD5ypbMaz; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:42:31 -0700 (PDT) X-ASG-Whitelist: Client Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1LjT0Q-0003jv-F6; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:42:30 +0000 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:42:30 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Hisashi Hifumi Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [PATCH] XFS: Pagecache usage optimization on XFS Subject: Re: [PATCH] XFS: Pagecache usage optimization on XFS Message-ID: <20090317064230.GA26111@infradead.org> References: <6.0.0.20.2.20090304114824.06985898@172.19.0.2> <20090316091606.GA1720@infradead.org> <6.0.0.20.2.20090317102134.06e60b30@172.19.0.2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.20.2.20090317102134.06e60b30@172.19.0.2> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-Barracuda-Connect: bombadil.infradead.org[18.85.46.34] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1237272151 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 01:03:08PM +0900, Hisashi Hifumi wrote: > > At 18:16 09/03/16, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >This looks like it should work. did you run XFSQA on a small blocksize > >filesystem with this applied? > > Hi. > I did XFSQA test on XFS partition with this patch applied. > > arch:ia64 > pagesize:16K > blocksize:2K Thanks a lot. In that case the patch is fine with me. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig (as in reviewing the generic function to make sense with XFS :)) From felixb@sgi.com Tue Mar 17 10:48:00 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2HFldC0166645; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:48:00 -0500 Received: from estes.americas.sgi.com (estes.americas.sgi.com [128.162.236.10]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CC58F80B7; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:47:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eagdhcp-233-164.americas.sgi.com (eagdhcp-233-164.americas.sgi.com [128.162.233.164]) by estes.americas.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E557000103; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:19:59 -0500 (CDT) Cc: Hisashi Hifumi , xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com Message-Id: From: Felix Blyakher To: Christoph Hellwig In-Reply-To: <20090317064230.GA26111@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Subject: Re: [PATCH] XFS: Pagecache usage optimization on XFS Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:19:58 -0500 References: <6.0.0.20.2.20090304114824.06985898@172.19.0.2> <20090316091606.GA1720@infradead.org> <6.0.0.20.2.20090317102134.06e60b30@172.19.0.2> <20090317064230.GA26111@infradead.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean On Mar 17, 2009, at 1:42 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 01:03:08PM +0900, Hisashi Hifumi wrote: >> >> At 18:16 09/03/16, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> This looks like it should work. did you run XFSQA on a small >>> blocksize >>> filesystem with this applied? >> >> Hi. >> I did XFSQA test on XFS partition with this patch applied. >> >> arch:ia64 >> pagesize:16K >> blocksize:2K > > Thanks a lot. In that case the patch is fine with me. > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig > > (as in reviewing the generic function to make sense with XFS :)) Make sense to me too. Reviewed-by: Felix Blyakher From johannes@sipsolutions.net Tue Mar 17 16:27:55 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2HLRYLU183651 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:27:55 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1237325212-24ae01b60000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from sipsolutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 49CCF1A4539; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:26:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sipsolutions.net (xc.sipsolutions.net [83.246.72.84]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ahOgTeyMN2KGwQng; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:26:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LjgnE-0003kV-D9; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:25:48 +0100 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: lockdep report with 2.6.29-rc8-wl-18593-gef1cb6f-dirty Subject: lockdep report with 2.6.29-rc8-wl-18593-gef1cb6f-dirty From: Johannes Berg To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-59nMbdlnTLjLok6jFJY5" Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:45:20 +0100 Message-Id: <1237315521.31814.17.camel@johannes.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 X-Barracuda-Connect: xc.sipsolutions.net[83.246.72.84] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1237325234 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -0.82 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-0.82 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests=BSF_RULE7568M, BSF_RULE_7582B, PR0N_SUBJECT X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.20618 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.50 BSF_RULE7568M Custom Rule 7568M 0.20 PR0N_SUBJECT Subject has letters around special characters (pr0n) 0.50 BSF_RULE_7582B Custom Rule 7582B X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean --=-59nMbdlnTLjLok6jFJY5 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (ignore the -wl-... stuff, it's a wireless tree, but everything but wireless is plain -rc8) This happened about 20 minutes into a long rsync session where I was writing a lot of data to the XFS filesystem: [ 2182.810987] =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D [ 2182.811372] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 2182.811669] 2.6.29-rc8-wl-18593-gef1cb6f-dirty #30 [ 2182.811894] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 2182.812189] rsync/4528 is trying to acquire lock: [ 2182.812408] (iprune_mutex){--..}, at: [] .prune_icach= e+0x58/0x2c4 [ 2182.812802]=20 [ 2182.812803] but task is already holding lock: [ 2182.813073] (&(&ip->i_iolock)->mr_lock){----}, at: []= .xfs_ilock+0x30/0x9c [ 2182.813499]=20 [ 2182.813501] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 2182.813503]=20 [ 2182.813876]=20 [ 2182.813877] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 2182.814223]=20 [ 2182.814225] -> #1 (&(&ip->i_iolock)->mr_lock){----}: [ 2182.814544] [] .validate_chain+0x740/0x928 [ 2182.814846] [] .__lock_acquire+0x828/0x908 [ 2182.815148] [] .lock_acquire+0xa4/0xec [ 2182.815433] [] .down_write_nested+0x70/0x110 [ 2182.815744] [] .xfs_ilock+0x30/0x9c [ 2182.816016] [] .xfs_ireclaim+0xc0/0x1f0 [ 2182.828398] [] .xfs_reclaim_inode+0x16c/0x198 [ 2182.840760] [] .xfs_reclaim+0xc0/0xf0 [ 2182.853054] [] .xfs_fs_destroy_inode+0x4c/0x84 [ 2182.865273] [] .destroy_inode+0x58/0x8c [ 2182.877335] [] .dispose_list+0x108/0x17c [ 2182.889251] [] .prune_icache+0x288/0x2c4 [ 2182.901023] [] .shrink_icache_memory+0x2c/0x64 [ 2182.912715] [] .shrink_slab+0x168/0x27c [ 2182.924301] [] .balance_pgdat+0x3f8/0x614 [ 2182.935746] [] .kswapd+0x154/0x158 [ 2182.947235] [] .kthread+0x78/0xc4 [ 2182.958620] [] .kernel_thread+0x54/0x70 [ 2182.969955]=20 [ 2182.969956] -> #0 (iprune_mutex){--..}: [ 2182.992430] [] .__lock_acquire+0x828/0x908 [ 2183.003723] [] .lock_acquire+0xa4/0xec [ 2183.014986] [] .mutex_lock_nested+0x194/0x4c8 [ 2183.026210] [] .prune_icache+0x58/0x2c4 [ 2183.037321] [] .shrink_icache_memory+0x2c/0x64 [ 2183.048365] [] .shrink_slab+0x168/0x27c [ 2183.059271] [] .do_try_to_free_pages+0x2bc/0x43= 8 [ 2183.070142] [] .try_to_free_pages+0xa0/0xcc [ 2183.080867] [] .__alloc_pages_internal+0x32c/0x= 55c [ 2183.091593] [] .grab_cache_page_write_begin+0x8= 0/0xf0 [ 2183.102345] [] .block_write_begin+0x60/0x13c [ 2183.113136] [] .xfs_vm_write_begin+0x24/0x3c [ 2183.123933] [] .generic_perform_write+0x100/0x2= 94 [ 2183.134731] [] .generic_file_buffered_write+0x8= 8/0x15c [ 2183.145447] [] .xfs_write+0x4ac/0x70c [ 2183.156132] [] .xfs_file_aio_write+0x78/0x8c [ 2183.166837] [] .do_sync_write+0xcc/0x130 [ 2183.177399] [] .vfs_write+0xd0/0x1bc [ 2183.188041] [] .SyS_write+0x58/0xa0 [ 2183.198645] [] syscall_exit+0x0/0x40 [ 2183.209296]=20 [ 2183.209297] other info that might help us debug this: [ 2183.209299]=20 [ 2183.240399] 3 locks held by rsync/4528: [ 2183.250633] #0: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5){--..}, at: [] .xfs_write+0x1c8/0x70c [ 2183.261377] #1: (&(&ip->i_iolock)->mr_lock){----}, at: [] .xfs_ilock+0x30/0x9c [ 2183.272194] #2: (shrinker_rwsem){----}, at: [] .shri= nk_slab+0x60/0x27c [ 2183.283115]=20 [ 2183.283116] stack backtrace: [ 2183.304318] Call Trace: [ 2183.314712] [c0000001b096ab60] [c00000000000fef8] .show_stack+0x6c/0x174= (unreliable) [ 2183.325448] [c0000001b096ac10] [c000000000089528] .print_circular_bug_ta= il+0xd8/0xfc [ 2183.336117] [c0000001b096ace0] [c00000000008a7c0] .validate_chain+0x740/= 0x928 [ 2183.346633] [c0000001b096ada0] [c00000000008b1d0] .__lock_acquire+0x828/= 0x908 [ 2183.356978] [c0000001b096aea0] [c00000000008b354] .lock_acquire+0xa4/0xe= c [ 2183.367329] [c0000001b096af60] [c000000000428ce8] .mutex_lock_nested+0x1= 94/0x4c8 [ 2183.377555] [c0000001b096b070] [c000000000124160] .prune_icache+0x58/0x2= c4 [ 2183.387589] [c0000001b096b130] [c0000000001243f8] .shrink_icache_memory+= 0x2c/0x64 [ 2183.397649] [c0000001b096b1b0] [c0000000000de4f8] .shrink_slab+0x168/0x2= 7c [ 2183.407654] [c0000001b096b280] [c0000000000df37c] .do_try_to_free_pages+= 0x2bc/0x438 [ 2183.417842] [c0000001b096b380] [c0000000000df598] .try_to_free_pages+0xa= 0/0xcc [ 2183.427975] [c0000001b096b470] [c0000000000d60f4] .__alloc_pages_interna= l+0x32c/0x55c [ 2183.438101] [c0000001b096b5a0] [c0000000000ce8c8] .grab_cache_page_write= _begin+0x80/0xf0 [ 2183.448275] [c0000001b096b650] [c000000000139798] .block_write_begin+0x6= 0/0x13c [ 2183.458381] [c0000001b096b710] [c000000000223eb8] .xfs_vm_write_begin+0x= 24/0x3c [ 2183.468545] [c0000001b096b790] [c0000000000cd3f8] .generic_perform_write= +0x100/0x294 [ 2183.478770] [c0000001b096b8a0] [c0000000000cfb88] .generic_file_buffered= _write+0x88/0x15c [ 2183.489036] [c0000001b096b980] [c00000000022c0d0] .xfs_write+0x4ac/0x70c [ 2183.499291] [c0000001b096bad0] [c000000000227c30] .xfs_file_aio_write+0x= 78/0x8c [ 2183.509609] [c0000001b096bb40] [c00000000010a8b4] .do_sync_write+0xcc/0x= 130 [ 2183.519935] [c0000001b096bce0] [c00000000010b4c0] .vfs_write+0xd0/0x1bc --=-59nMbdlnTLjLok6jFJY5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJJv+++AAoJEKVg1VMiehFYxIAP/Ay6Rfkfqo9fdoEOO8dlXdzI J02xVr/YDHrPUPONH8872W4whgxVSlxYoZuOdzPGw723bw21lU8cDc3fDjHojClX bXGEYBmGBJMP78koZuT2TzrV1eEXtVOU1i1Vb2ekk2cHvzJlg2OuvI5LcIvLOA6C PNc1gCOzCEq9M0iMtltpYYBzCmpCbxWpB7WVEIDefqzfEGxDIy/IlpMgiR4nsBXX yh3cXr7/Xm78/leCEyOEvkSpFAakkdUHttT7hLU0sTRNCr5El+37j6TtzeWuJfF6 Lpbm32wBwXsEmH9xMY3RE7GJN1eaAf9QHNQWHJmp4snICmEWcRwsaSGFNoSZqGXO YEMojOJ9McoFHrVoeoZhrNeDuwTQVfZj+nixDhRXEMG+YEVHO3cisCcmP2gZeQVo SOiOnssIWBo5zPKwlBp18uR84dGf9Sr+1IUnl4yl/5RXPyAt5pHnn4bkUgGE4Q85 1giGspYGiv9xlhwDR2CcVI1QbKwRL2eeoQsGlYxPAVrFS4rKszjgrazXdX5AhwOe I5wwCSmOf04cHN8HniOLOujIyM2fPZtprruPAwP1Qd6Sq+nqllBLeoE3qcNu/m8d G5nAM5qspnqn1P93j4jnUjynbGuVotlvvyf8cBINKz3qkZHxn2CVIGMbnwrl3A1u BoXR6Wdf4maT2ixtZ4RW =Nhvg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-59nMbdlnTLjLok6jFJY5-- From bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Wed Mar 18 05:49:01 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2IAmf9Q230811 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:49:01 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1237373299-22aa03400000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 62AA11A65D3 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.13]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 885iWIxwf76BU5oj for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from picon.linux-foundation.org (picon.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.79]) by smtp1.linux-foundation.org (8.14.2/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id n2IAlCK3025529 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:47:48 -0700 Received: by picon.linux-foundation.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 11B77108041; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:47:11 -0700 (PDT) X-ASG-Orig-Subj: [Bug 10876] (reproducible) NULL pointer dereference on mounting a corrupted filesystem Subject: [Bug 10876] (reproducible) NULL pointer dereference on mounting a corrupted filesystem In-Reply-To: X-Bugzilla-Product: File System X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com From: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Message-Id: <20090318104712.11B77108041@picon.linux-foundation.org> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (domain of bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-MIMEDefang-Filter: lf$Revision: 1.188 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 140.211.169.13 X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp1.linux-foundation.org[140.211.169.13] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1237373300 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.20651 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10876 galitsyn@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |galitsyn@gmail.com ------- Comment #4 from galitsyn@gmail.com 2009-03-18 03:47 ------- I have the same problem. Dave, your patch does not fixes the problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Wed Mar 18 10:17:56 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, J_CHICKENPOX_43,J_CHICKENPOX_52 autolearn=no version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2IFHud3248121 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:17:56 -0500 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2IFHuVH248120; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:17:56 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:17:56 -0500 Message-Id: <200903181517.n2IFHuVH248120@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 785] xfs_io doesn't correctly reallocate struct getbmapx in bmap_f X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: xfsprogs X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: trivial X-Bugzilla-Who: moosh009@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=785 --- Comment #4 from Tomasz Majkowski 2009-03-18 10:17:54 CST --- The code I looked at doesn't work correctly for files that have between 16 and 29 'holes'. The code I looked at was from xfsprogs-2.6.25.src.tar.bz2 found inside the xfsprogs-2.6.25-0.6.src.rpm from SLES9 sp2 i386 distribution. Machine info (SLES9 sp2): > uname -a Linux blahblah 2.6.5-7.191-default #1 Tue Jun 28 14:58:56 UTC 2005 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux > xfs_info /space meta-data=/space isize=256 agcount=16, agsize=311384 blks = sectsz=512 data = bsize=4096 blocks=4982144, imaxpct=25 = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks, unwritten=1 naming =version 2 bsize=4096 log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=2560, version=1 = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks realtime =none extsz=65536 blocks=0, rtextents=0 See below for how I reproduce this: > cat hole.c #include #include #include #include #include #define SEEKBY (0x100000) int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int fd, holes, i; holes = 10; switch(argc) { case 2: holes = atoi(argv[1]); default: break; } fd = open("hole_file", O_CREAT | O_WRONLY, 0644); for (i = 0; i < holes; i++) { write(fd, "1", 1); lseek(fd, SEEKBY - 1, SEEK_CUR); } write(fd, "1", 1); close(fd); return (0); } > cat genfiles #/bin/bash for i in 10 14 15 16 17 28 29 30 31; do rm -f hole_file ./hole ${i} mv hole_file hole_file${i} done > cat runfiles #/bin/bash for i in 10 14 15 16 17 28 29 30 31; do xfs_bmap -v hole_file${i} > r${i} done > cat runfiles2 #/bin/bash for i in 10 14 15 16 17 28 29 30 31; do ./io/xfs_io -r -p xfs_bmap -c "bmap -v" hole_file${i} > t${i} done > gcc hole.c -o hole > ./genfiles > ./runfiles Now look in the r?? files and notice that files hole_file15 hole_file16 hole_file17 hole_file28 hole_file29 All show to have 15 'holes' which is not correct they have 15, 16, 17, 28, 29 respectively Now apply my patch and re-run. See the results. The problem is that fsx.fsx_nextents is not the same as the number of entries required in struct getbmapx to represent that file. Eg: a file with 1 hole (ie data, hole, data) will have fsx.fsx_nextents=2, 1 'hole' and needs 3 entries in struct getbmapx to represent it correctly. Perhaps my patch is also not correct, but it appears more correct that the original. -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Wed Mar 18 10:19:21 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2IFJLRu248308 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:19:21 -0500 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2IFJLTC248307; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:19:21 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:19:21 -0500 Message-Id: <200903181519.n2IFJLTC248307@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 785] xfs_io doesn't correctly reallocate struct getbmapx in bmap_f X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: xfsprogs X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: trivial X-Bugzilla-Who: moosh009@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=785 Tomasz Majkowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From kp9ohmksco@yahoo.ca Thu Mar 19 02:16:08 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2J7FleW046527 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:16:08 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1237446906-0ba203250000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from smtp101.mail.mud.yahoo.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with SMTP id D012D1C431E6 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp101.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp101.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.85.211]) by cuda.sgi.com with SMTP id iF46usJBKLQQPvGC for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6492 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2009 07:15:06 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority; b=NW3+Oi9gHfQVq4gPf/X+vLRUPp6bzeobrYJ/uH9KdhoqwOGbEKflms24CYy8Esh5cJxUXWnwFE4YnzbRfJYKANBwzFgG5hmOzag4VzIBBsLltmYU+eaL40D5biyMe/f1lohiyyzppdEA93aZDUqgYcqcFAgOqI3iyPlj7HT+EUU= ; Received: from unknown (HELO scdbtm) (kp9ohmksco@121.34.101.174 with login) by smtp101.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2009 07:15:05 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: OuIXmoMVM1noFnJgmWMDn7SHwaaMSYNzL39IXbVi8hKNU6vhE_pCjPbB31oVJL1VoUWnbJG.AdxgovcMEvRj1n.fVTIFJ.sW_svaQKw3917ZzCyKlocfjm4NcfAuu7eIKmyOdWZ3JdWmKTl15FYgIxOu X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: "Qimzrm" To: "xfs-masters" X-ASG-Orig-Subj: rstglbs coj Subject: rstglbs coj Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:15:02 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 1 X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp101.mail.mud.yahoo.com[209.191.85.211] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1237446927 Message-Id: <20090319071506.D012D1C431E6@cuda.sgi.com> X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.4974 1.0000 0.0000 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.20704 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Thu Mar 19 06:13:42 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2JBDg9q060807 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:13:42 -0500 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2JBDg0h060806; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:13:42 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:13:42 -0500 From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 817] New: XFS driver oops when trying to mount "dirty" filesystem. X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS kernel code X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical X-Bugzilla-Who: galitsyn@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=817 Summary: XFS driver oops when trying to mount "dirty" filesystem. Product: XFS Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: XFS kernel code AssignedTo: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com ReportedBy: galitsyn@gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Unclassified I am using XFS driver that comes with 2.6.23 kernel at SH4 platform. When I am trying to mount "dirty" filesystem (not previously properly unmounted) I see kernel oops. There is still opened bug #10876 (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10876) at bugzilla.kernel.org that describes the same problem. So, the problem is actual even for latest driver versions that comes with official kernel distributions. Log attached. -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Thu Mar 19 06:14:54 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2JBEroZ060916 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:14:53 -0500 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2JBErI5060913; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:14:53 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:14:53 -0500 Message-Id: <200903191114.n2JBErI5060913@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 817] XFS driver oops when trying to mount "dirty" filesystem. X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS kernel code X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical X-Bugzilla-Who: galitsyn@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=817 --- Comment #1 from Vadim V. Galitsyn 2009-03-19 06:14:52 CST --- Created an attachment (id=262) --> (http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=262) Kernel oops when trying to mount dirty file system Kernel oops when trying to mount dirty file system -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Fri Mar 20 01:02:40 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2K62eZR137821 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:02:40 -0500 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2K62ek1137820; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:02:40 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:02:40 -0500 Message-Id: <200903200602.n2K62ek1137820@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 817] XFS driver oops when trying to mount "dirty" filesystem. X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS kernel code X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical X-Bugzilla-Who: hch@xfs.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=817 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Hellwig 2009-03-20 01:02:37 CST --- Created an attachment (id=263) --> (http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=263) Validate quota logitems before calling xfs_qm_dqcheck Your issue doesn't look like the one on kernel.org, but I've seen it elsewhere before. Can you try with the attached patch and see what output it gives you? -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Fri Mar 20 02:21:35 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2K7LZN3147621 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:21:35 -0500 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2K7LYl9147620; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:21:34 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:21:34 -0500 Message-Id: <200903200721.n2K7LYl9147620@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 785] xfs_io doesn't correctly reallocate struct getbmapx in bmap_f X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: xfsprogs X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: trivial X-Bugzilla-Who: hch@xfs.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=785 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Hellwig 2009-03-20 02:21:33 CST --- Thanks a lot for the testcase. I understand the problem now. XFS_IOC_FSGETXATTR only counts actually allocated extents, but for each allocated extent we may have a hole inbetween that is not allocated. I've modified your patch a little bit to add comments what's going on and adjust the numbers a bit. I've also created adopted your testcase for xfsqa so that we can regression-test this. -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Fri Mar 20 02:30:48 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, J_CHICKENPOX_63 autolearn=no version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2K7Um5P148896 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:30:48 -0500 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2K7UlUO148895; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:30:48 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:30:48 -0500 Message-Id: <200903200730.n2K7UlUO148895@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 817] XFS driver oops when trying to mount "dirty" filesystem. X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS kernel code X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical X-Bugzilla-Who: hch@xfs.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status CC Resolution In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=817 Christoph Hellwig changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |hch@xfs.org Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Christoph Hellwig 2009-03-20 02:30:46 CST --- Oh, and we already have a bug open for this in this bugzilla, closing as duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 816 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Fri Mar 20 02:30:51 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2K7UpHA148930 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:30:51 -0500 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2K7UpXr148927; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:30:51 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:30:51 -0500 Message-Id: <200903200730.n2K7UpXr148927@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 816] xfs_qm_dqcheck oops in 2.6.28.7 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS kernel code X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: hch@xfs.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=816 Christoph Hellwig changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |galitsyn@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Christoph Hellwig 2009-03-20 02:30:46 CST --- *** Bug 817 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Fri Mar 20 05:25:18 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2KAPIwG161938 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 05:25:18 -0500 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2KAPIp2161934; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 05:25:18 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 05:25:18 -0500 Message-Id: <200903201025.n2KAPIp2161934@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 817] XFS driver oops when trying to mount "dirty" filesystem. X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS kernel code X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical X-Bugzilla-Who: galitsyn@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=817 --- Comment #4 from Vadim V. Galitsyn 2009-03-20 05:25:16 CST --- Christoph, Your patch fixes the problem. Thanks! [ 20.200095] XFS mounting filesystem sda2 [ 20.438736] Starting XFS recovery on filesystem: sda2 (logdev: internal) [ 20.455604] XFS: xlog_recover_process_data: bad clientid [ 20.459973] XFS: log mount/recovery failed: error 5 [ 20.464480] XFS: log mount failed mount: Mounting /dev/sda2 on /.HDD/ failed: Input/output error -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Fri Mar 20 05:57:54 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2KAvrh6163521 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 05:57:54 -0500 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2KAvrK4163519; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 05:57:53 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 05:57:53 -0500 Message-Id: <200903201057.n2KAvrK4163519@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 817] XFS driver oops when trying to mount "dirty" filesystem. X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS kernel code X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical X-Bugzilla-Who: hch@xfs.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=817 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Hellwig 2009-03-20 05:57:52 CST --- I don't think so. You're not even hitting the check the patch put in, but another one. And the filesystem still doesn't mount which it should. Just wondering, what driver do use and do you have barriers enabled? Is DM or MD involved somehow? -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Fri Mar 20 09:04:42 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2KE4gmo173595 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:04:42 -0500 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2KE4g36173593; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:04:42 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:04:42 -0500 Message-Id: <200903201404.n2KE4g36173593@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 817] XFS driver oops when trying to mount "dirty" filesystem. X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS kernel code X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical X-Bugzilla-Who: galitsyn@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=817 --- Comment #6 from Vadim V. Galitsyn 2009-03-20 09:04:40 CST --- > I don't think so. You're not even hitting the check the patch put in, but another one. Pardon, I have wrongly decided that cmn_err() function (that we use for log output) should print out something in case we enable some verbose level in the driver code. So, I have not payed attention to log messages that were placed in the patch. That's my fault. After applying your patch I had never see that oops again. Just be noted, before I have applied the patch I observed the problem is not 100% reproducible, it appears from time to time. > And the filesystem still doesn't mount which it should. Actually, the idea was to reduce oops while mounting only. > Just wondering, what driver do use I'm using xfs driver that comes with 2.6.23 kernel (as I have stated at the bug description). Be noted, I have adapted your patch for my driver version to be able to apply it. > do you have barriers enabled? How can I check that? > Is DM or MD involved somehow? No I have observed that the issue can be reduced in case I will do xfs_repair just before mount. After that the problem was not reproduced anymore (for partition to which I have applied xfs_repair). -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Sat Mar 21 13:42:20 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2LIgK6d007225 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:42:20 -0500 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2LIgKCh007223; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:42:20 -0500 Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:42:20 -0500 Message-Id: <200903211842.n2LIgKCh007223@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 817] XFS driver oops when trying to mount "dirty" filesystem. X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS kernel code X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical X-Bugzilla-Who: sandeen-xfs@sandeen.net X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=817 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sandeen-xfs@sandeen.net --- Comment #7 from Eric Sandeen 2009-03-21 13:42:17 CST --- (In reply to comment #6) ... > > do you have barriers enabled? > > How can I check that? check dmesg after a mount; if barrier writes failed you'll get a notice > > Is DM or MD involved somehow? > No > > I have observed that the issue can be reduced in case I will do xfs_repair just > before mount. After that the problem was not reproduced anymore (for partition > to which I have applied xfs_repair). how did you invoke xfs_repair? If it was with -L then that's quite expected, you erased the log, so there was no log replay to oops in. -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Mon Mar 23 07:56:41 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2NCuevO155845 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:56:41 -0500 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2NCueP2155844; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:56:40 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:56:40 -0500 Message-Id: <200903231256.n2NCueP2155844@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 817] XFS driver oops when trying to mount "dirty" filesystem. X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS kernel code X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical X-Bugzilla-Who: galitsyn@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=817 --- Comment #8 from Vadim V. Galitsyn 2009-03-23 07:56:37 CST --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > ... > > > do you have barriers enabled? > > > > How can I check that? > > check dmesg after a mount; if barrier writes failed you'll get a notice According to the facts that - "write barrier support is enabled by default in XFS since kernel version 2.6.17"; - I have no specific mount options during mount; So, I guess, barriers are enabled, however I do not see any barrier related logs after mount. > > > > Is DM or MD involved somehow? > > No > > > > I have observed that the issue can be reduced in case I will do xfs_repair just > > before mount. After that the problem was not reproduced anymore (for partition > > to which I have applied xfs_repair). > > how did you invoke xfs_repair? If it was with -L then that's quite expected, > you erased the log, so there was no log replay to oops in. Yes, it was with -L option. -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Mon Mar 23 10:01:14 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2NF1EMo164371 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:01:14 -0500 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2NF1Ewe164369; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:01:14 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:01:14 -0500 Message-Id: <200903231501.n2NF1Ewe164369@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 817] XFS driver oops when trying to mount "dirty" filesystem. X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS kernel code X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical X-Bugzilla-Who: sandeen-xfs@sandeen.net X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=817 --- Comment #9 from Eric Sandeen 2009-03-23 10:01:11 CST --- (In reply to comment #8) > According to the facts that > > - "write barrier support is enabled by default in XFS since kernel version > 2.6.17"; > - I have no specific mount options during mount; > > So, I guess, barriers are enabled, however I do not see any barrier related > logs after mount. XFS tries to enable them but you will get a message if they are turned off due to failure. In any case if you see no messages, barriers are in force. > > how did you invoke xfs_repair? If it was with -L then that's quite expected, > > you erased the log, so there was no log replay to oops in. > > Yes, it was with -L option. Well, in general don't do that except as a last resort; if, say, you are oopsing on log replay ;) -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Mon Mar 23 11:20:27 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_63 autolearn=no version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2NGK6FO169359 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:20:26 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1237825173-0ce700ea0000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 840F413BF691 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:19:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.13]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ArfS9u9kk7aBglFc for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:19:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from picon.linux-foundation.org (picon.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.79]) by smtp1.linux-foundation.org (8.14.2/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id n2NGIJnx023718 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:18:55 -0700 Received: by picon.linux-foundation.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id E84E4108091; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:18:19 -0700 (PDT) X-ASG-Orig-Subj: [Bug 9800] 2.6.24-rc8: possible circular locking dependency detected Subject: [Bug 9800] 2.6.24-rc8: possible circular locking dependency detected In-Reply-To: X-Bugzilla-Product: File System X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Component: XFS To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com From: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Message-Id: <20090323161819.E84E4108091@picon.linux-foundation.org> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (domain of bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-MIMEDefang-Filter: lf$Revision: 1.188 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 140.211.169.13 X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp1.linux-foundation.org[140.211.169.13] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1237825194 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.21116 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9800 alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |REJECTED Resolution| |INVALID -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Mon Mar 23 12:08:36 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_63 autolearn=no version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2NH8FiW172197 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:08:36 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1237828083-6774007b0000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 00C8D13BF52A for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.13]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id kHxenGWkELcQYRrM for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from picon.linux-foundation.org (picon.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.79]) by smtp1.linux-foundation.org (8.14.2/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id n2NH6Zsv030326 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:07:10 -0700 Received: by picon.linux-foundation.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 8357311D10B; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:00:07 -0700 (PDT) X-ASG-Orig-Subj: [Bug 7364] nbd dead-lock/panic with 4k stack Subject: [Bug 7364] nbd dead-lock/panic with 4k stack In-Reply-To: X-Bugzilla-Product: IO/Storage X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Component: Block Layer To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com From: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Message-Id: <20090323170007.8357311D10B@picon.linux-foundation.org> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (domain of bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-MIMEDefang-Filter: lf$Revision: 1.188 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 140.211.169.13 X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp1.linux-foundation.org[140.211.169.13] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1237828084 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.21120 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7364 alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Status|NEW |NEEDINFO ------- Comment #18 from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk 2009-03-23 10:00 ------- Please verify against a modern kernel as XFS went on a stack diet -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Tue Mar 24 02:23:05 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, J_CHICKENPOX_63 autolearn=no version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2O7N0um229663 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:23:05 -0500 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2O7N02b229646; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:23:00 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:23:00 -0500 Message-Id: <200903240723.n2O7N02b229646@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 811] /etc/projid and /etc/projects file need manpages X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: xfsprogs X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: hch@xfs.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=811 Christoph Hellwig changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Christoph Hellwig 2009-03-24 02:22:39 CST --- The two manpages are now in. -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Tue Mar 24 02:24:15 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2O7OAQG229758 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:24:15 -0500 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2O7OAQu229732; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:24:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:24:10 -0500 Message-Id: <200903240724.n2O7OAQu229732@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 785] xfs_io doesn't correctly reallocate struct getbmapx in bmap_f X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: xfsprogs X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: trivial X-Bugzilla-Who: hch@xfs.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=785 Christoph Hellwig changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Christoph Hellwig 2009-03-24 02:23:19 CST --- Closing as the fix and testcase are reviewed and commited now. Thanks a lot for the patience! -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Thu Mar 26 16:39:59 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2QLddsj190757 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:39:49 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1238103552-6be6000c0000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from demeter.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 471761C8FCF for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:39:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from demeter.kernel.org (demeter.kernel.org [140.211.167.39]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id k70aIo9ExyNSV1zV for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:39:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from demeter.kernel.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.kernel.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n2QLdB7u030797 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:39:11 GMT Received: (from apache@localhost) by demeter.kernel.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n2QLdB5d030796; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:39:11 GMT Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:39:11 GMT Message-Id: <200903262139.n2QLdB5d030796@demeter.kernel.org> X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.kernel.org: apache set sender to bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org using -f From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: [Bug 7364] nbd dead-lock/panic with 4k stack Subject: [Bug 7364] nbd dead-lock/panic with 4k stack X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: IO/Storage X-Bugzilla-Component: Block Layer X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bonbons67@internet.lu X-Bugzilla-Status: NEEDINFO X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: axboe@kernel.dk X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Regression In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: demeter.kernel.org[140.211.167.39] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1238103553 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR, NO_REAL_NAME X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.21423 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name 0.00 MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR URI: Includes a link to a likely spammer email X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7364 Bruno changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regression|--- |No --- Comment #19 from Bruno 2009-03-26 21:39:09 --- Seems to survive a run with: Server side: nbd-client-2.9.11 Client side: ndb-client-2.9.11 (using 1k blocks), linux-2.6.29 (CONFIG_4KSTACKS=y), XFS filesystem, [ 2106.706056] nbd: registered device at major 43 [ 2144.206120] Filesystem "nbd0": Disabling barriers, trial barrier write failed [ 2144.207097] XFS mounting filesystem nbd0 [ 2144.323944] Starting XFS recovery on filesystem: nbd0 (logdev: internal) [ 2144.392744] Ending XFS recovery on filesystem: nbd0 (logdev: internal) [ 4788.331401] ldconfig used greatest stack depth: 856 bytes left I will do some more testing during week-end, doing some more I/O load. Until now it survived two emerge --metadata runs and compiling a few packages. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Fri Mar 27 09:58:44 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2REwdA4247415 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:58:44 -0500 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2REwdmX247411; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:58:39 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:58:39 -0500 From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 818] New: xfsdq X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: xfsprogs X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: y.hamuth@ucl.ac.uk X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=818 Summary: xfsdq Product: XFS Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: xfsprogs AssignedTo: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com ReportedBy: y.hamuth@ucl.ac.uk Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Unclassified I currently use xfs under Ubuntu 6.06 server X64. I get the following: repquota /home |wc -l 515 Where as I have 5645 users As a result I can't export quota info using xfsdq xfsdq /home |wc -l 1016 Is this a bug? -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From wwwrun@oss.sgi.com Fri Mar 27 10:53:59 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, J_CHICKENPOX_63 autolearn=no version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2RFrrnV251070 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:53:58 -0500 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2RFrrsX251050; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:53:53 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:53:53 -0500 Message-Id: <200903271553.n2RFrrsX251050@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 818] xfsdq X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Classification: Unclassified X-Bugzilla-Product: XFS X-Bugzilla-Component: xfsprogs X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: hch@xfs.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status CC Resolution In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=818 Christoph Hellwig changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |hch@xfs.org Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Christoph Hellwig 2009-03-27 10:53:33 CST --- xfsdq has been removed more than three years ago, please upgrade to a more recent xfsprogs/xfsdump. -- Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. From xfs-master@oss.sgi.com Sun Mar 29 07:27:27 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,J_CHICKENPOX_33, J_CHICKENPOX_71,RCVD_IN_SBL autolearn=no version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2TCRMTh134103 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:27:27 -0500 Received: (from xfs-master@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2TCRMHt134079 for xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:27:22 -0500 Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2TCQaVe134038 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:26:46 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1238329587-774902f30000-lnlpjA X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail.tij.uia.mx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id F0F0A13D88BF for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 05:26:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.tij.uia.mx (ignatius.tij.uia.mx [192.100.193.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id uWn8B0j8TqnXWojt for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 05:26:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tij.uia.mx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC7B314B00; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 04:23:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at tij.uia.mx Received: from mail.tij.uia.mx ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ignatius.tij.uia.mx [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FDfjiedRJLUl; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 04:23:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail.tij.uia.mx (Postfix, from userid 33) id 76406314927; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:59:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from 80.89.180.78 ([80.89.180.78]) by tij.uia.mx (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:59:51 -0800 Message-ID: <20090329035951.jqr4gx816ogg8sok@tij.uia.mx> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:59:51 -0800 From: Mohammed Jamal Reply-To: jamaljamaljamal32@gmail.com To: undisclosed-recipients:; X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Jamal. Subject: Jamal. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.3) X-Barracuda-Connect: ignatius.tij.uia.mx[192.100.193.34] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1238329608 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.6893 1.0000 1.2895 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 1.29 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=1.29 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.21671 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Status: Clean My intention of contacting you is to solicit your assistance in a Project,Though I know my decision to contact you in this manner is unconventional, the prevailing circumstances necessitated my action.I am Mohammed Jamal from Sukang, in State of Brunei Darussalam an oil explorer.I have esophageal cancer and the doctors say i have Six months left.Honestly everyone will surely die one day,but how you pass through this world is what matters,I have been distributing funds to charity organizations but Due to my present condition i cant do this anymore,i need you to help distribute my remaining money to war torn countries and religious organizations,Any delaying your reply will give room in sourcing for an organization or a devoted person for this same purpose.Until I hear from you my dreams will rest squarely on your shoulders.Jamal ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From bzolnier@gmail.com Sun Mar 29 12:31:25 2009 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2THV56h150924 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:31:15 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1238347812-3b31032a0000-7TOuyN X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-bw0-f178.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id EBE591C7C40E for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:30:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bw0-f178.google.com (mail-bw0-f178.google.com [209.85.218.178]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id MlODpUweAVeMeIrT for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:30:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bwz26 with SMTP id 26so1640850bwz.20 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:30:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; bh=A2pyKLbi0qylCk/AJc6kmTK7lLdpENo7KBronq0ZKjI=; b=SdYU4rLXYoDUCnuTQvEWPSFGhkveJ2DGs7G7YzMubF2sgOBEjx6R/tJZjHtR+U8gCL hGYiIsPvd4EB0HdEUveoLPXo4IsA6aQrmgLudxczZasm9CtAPkStHyGaPJuAksx+dUkQ y95wCSzmtwnuh7T6gilFLuLOOnjj0oWcT19/g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=kbp29FvDX3pdL46pCj07QjlviG7J+CLjDSbZEeLNulmimbm7ajo+KAKHmwWDn4ySqp FA1pXP4wIDhAETHGnJv3nE30IMRug+zevLIroNkEVS+iQ7dYSN5Yjcq1x4Tm0iEgB+sF vzUQgSMumvuKh1iDUOHTwHO+GnY8fd80aV8I8= Received: by 10.103.168.5 with SMTP id v5mr1298529muo.77.1238347810955; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:30:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (chello089077051219.chello.pl [89.77.51.219]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i5sm7489649mue.43.2009.03.29.10.30.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:30:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: [PATCH] xfs: fix blkdev_issue_flush() failure handling Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fix blkdev_issue_flush() failure handling Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:31:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.1 (Linux/2.6.29-next-20090327-dirty; KDE/4.2.1; i686; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903291931.03775.bzolnier@gmail.com> X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-bw0-f178.google.com[209.85.218.178] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1238347833 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.21692 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean blkdev_issue_flush() may fail (i.e. due to media error on FLUSH CACHE command execution) so its users should check for the return value. Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz --- fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c | 1 + fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c | 4 ++-- fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.h | 2 +- fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c | 19 +++++++++++++++---- 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) Index: b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c =================================================================== --- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c +++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c @@ -1446,6 +1446,7 @@ xfs_free_buftarg( { xfs_flush_buftarg(btp, 1); if (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_BARRIER) + /* FIXME: check return value */ xfs_blkdev_issue_flush(btp); xfs_free_bufhash(btp); iput(btp->bt_mapping->host); Index: b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c =================================================================== --- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c +++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c @@ -721,11 +721,11 @@ xfs_mountfs_check_barriers(xfs_mount_t * } } -void +int xfs_blkdev_issue_flush( xfs_buftarg_t *buftarg) { - blkdev_issue_flush(buftarg->bt_bdev, NULL); + return blkdev_issue_flush(buftarg->bt_bdev, NULL); } STATIC void Index: b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.h =================================================================== --- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.h +++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.h @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ struct block_device; extern __uint64_t xfs_max_file_offset(unsigned int); -extern void xfs_blkdev_issue_flush(struct xfs_buftarg *); +extern int xfs_blkdev_issue_flush(struct xfs_buftarg *); extern const struct export_operations xfs_export_operations; extern struct xattr_handler *xfs_xattr_handlers[]; Index: b/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c =================================================================== --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c @@ -597,6 +597,7 @@ xfs_fsync( xfs_trans_t *tp; int error; int log_flushed = 0, changed = 1; + int tmp_ret; xfs_itrace_entry(ip); @@ -679,19 +680,29 @@ xfs_fsync( } if ((ip->i_mount->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_BARRIER) && changed) { + xfs_buftarg_t *btp; + /* * If the log write didn't issue an ordered tag we need * to flush the disk cache for the data device now. */ - if (!log_flushed) - xfs_blkdev_issue_flush(ip->i_mount->m_ddev_targp); + if (!log_flushed) { + btp = ip->i_mount->m_ddev_targp; + tmp_ret = xfs_blkdev_issue_flush(btp); + if (error == 0 && tmp_ret < 0 && tmp_ret != -EOPNOTSUPP) + error = tmp_ret; + } /* * If this inode is on the RT dev we need to flush that * cache as well. */ - if (XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)) - xfs_blkdev_issue_flush(ip->i_mount->m_rtdev_targp); + if (XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)) { + btp = ip->i_mount->m_rtdev_targp; + tmp_ret = xfs_blkdev_issue_flush(btp); + if (error == 0 && tmp_ret < 0 && tmp_ret != -EOPNOTSUPP) + error = tmp_ret; + } } return error;