From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Sat Apr 1 06:18:15 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 06:18:05 -0800 Received: from 01-046.044.popsite.net ([216.126.163.46]:17925 "EHLO gilgamesh.uruk") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 06:17:57 -0800 Received: from localhost (really [127.0.0.1]) by as220.org via smail with esmtp id (Debian Smail3.2.0.102) for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 09:17:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 09:17:55 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Bray X-Sender: jb@gilgamesh.uruk To: sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Subject: SGI linux from CVS crashes on boot Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing I built from the SGI cvs tree (2.3-xfs) and get a crash on boot. This is just a preliminary post to see where to post more info about this. This crash happens with or without XFS configured in. Jim http://as220.org/jb From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Sat Apr 1 20:14:50 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 20:14:41 -0800 Received: from cranston-ip-1-173.dynamic.ziplink.net ([209.206.4.173]:17156 "EHLO gilgamesh.uruk") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 20:14:16 -0800 Received: from localhost (really [127.0.0.1]) by as220.org via smail with esmtp id (Debian Smail3.2.0.102) for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 23:14:08 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 23:14:07 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Bray X-Sender: jb@gilgamesh.uruk To: sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Subject: Can't build with kdebug: no bfd.h In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing make[2]: Entering directory `/src/kernels/sgi/linux/kdb' gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/src/kernels/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -DCPU=586 -march=k6 -fno-strict-aliasing -c -o kdbmain.o kdbmain.c In file included from kdbmain.c:36: /src/kernels/linux/include/linux/kdbprivate.h:26: bfd.h: No such file or directory Jim http://as220.org/jb " " \ ____/| / \ \ o.O| / \ =(_)= / \ U / \ | / \ #/ ACK! PHTHPHTH! "I am not a crook!" From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Sun Apr 2 06:49:04 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 06:48:53 -0700 Received: from cranston-ip-1-189.dynamic.ziplink.net ([209.206.4.189]:12036 "EHLO gilgamesh.uruk") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 06:48:39 -0700 Received: from localhost (really [127.0.0.1]) by as220.org via smail with esmtp id (Debian Smail3.2.0.102) for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 09:48:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 09:48:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Bray X-Sender: jb@gilgamesh.uruk To: Thomas Duffy cc: sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: SGI linux from CVS crashes on boot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Thomas Duffy wrote: > Can you send more info, like the oops message you get. And where it > crashing. According to the EIP, it is crashing in page_fault. EIP=c010af30, page_fault=c010af28. The sequence is Freeing unused kernel memory (148 k) (148k is much more than normal). General Protection Fault: 0000 EIP=etcetc. > > You also may be better off emailing the xfs mailing list since that is > more relevent to unstable kernel stuff as well as xfs talk. What is the address? Jim http://as220.org/jb From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Sun Apr 2 11:53:36 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 11:53:26 -0700 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:60241 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 11:53:22 -0700 Received: from nodin.corp.sgi.com (nodin.corp.sgi.com [192.26.51.193]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id LAA10482 for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 11:48:41 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tduffy@dbear.engr.sgi.com) Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by nodin.corp.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/980728.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA69891 for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 11:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dbear.engr.sgi.com (dbear.engr.sgi.com [163.154.18.85]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA46461; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 11:51:16 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tduffy@dbear.engr.sgi.com) Received: from localhost (tduffy@localhost) by dbear.engr.sgi.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA06617; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 11:47:43 -0700 Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 11:47:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Duffy To: Jim Bray cc: sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: SGI linux from CVS crashes on boot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing > According to the EIP, it is crashing in page_fault. EIP=c010af30, > page_fault=c010af28. The sequence is > Freeing unused kernel memory (148 k) (148k is much more than normal). > General Protection Fault: 0000 > EIP=etcetc. strange. maybe you should pop in kdb and do a backtrace. anybody else have any thoughts? > > You also may be better off emailing the xfs mailing list since that is > > more relevent to unstable kernel stuff as well as xfs talk. > > What is the address? linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com -tduffy From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Sun Apr 2 12:05:56 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 12:05:50 -0700 Received: from cranston-ip-1-74.dynamic.ziplink.net ([209.206.4.74]:43781 "EHLO gilgamesh.uruk") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 12:05:28 -0700 Received: from localhost (really [127.0.0.1]) by as220.org via smail with esmtp id (Debian Smail3.2.0.102) for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 15:05:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 15:04:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Bray X-Sender: jb@gilgamesh.uruk To: Thomas Duffy cc: sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: SGI linux from CVS crashes on boot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Thomas Duffy wrote: > > strange. maybe you should pop in kdb and do a backtrace. Tried that. kdb won't build: missing something like bfd.h. Sent out a message about it also. BTW, is kdb going to go GPL? If not, it probably won't and shouldn't make it into the standard source tree. If so, cool! Jim http://as220.org/jb " " \ ____/| / \ \ o.O| / \ =(_)= / \ U / \ | / \ #/ ACK! PHTHPHTH! "I am not a crook!" From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Sun Apr 2 15:53:18 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 15:53:09 -0700 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:18282 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 15:52:42 -0700 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id PAA23791 for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 15:48:01 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tduffy@dbear.engr.sgi.com) Received: from dbear.engr.sgi.com (dbear.engr.sgi.com [163.154.18.85]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA07580; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 15:52:24 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tduffy@dbear.engr.sgi.com) Received: from localhost (tduffy@localhost) by dbear.engr.sgi.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA06966; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 15:48:51 -0700 Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 15:48:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Duffy To: Jim Bray cc: sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: SGI linux from CVS crashes on boot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Jim Bray wrote: > On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Thomas Duffy wrote: > > > > > strange. maybe you should pop in kdb and do a backtrace. > > Tried that. kdb won't build: missing something like bfd.h. Sent out a > message about it also. I have bfd.h in my /usr/include...seems to be part of GNU/Cygnus compiler stuff. > BTW, is kdb going to go GPL? If not, it probably won't and shouldn't > make it into the standard source tree. If so, cool! It is already GPL. And Linus has said that linux does not need a kernel debugger and to keep it out. He programs using the force and mind tricks to debug. -tduffy From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Mon Apr 10 10:18:03 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:17:54 -0700 Received: from galway.uwyo.edu ([129.72.5.202]:40977 "EHLO galway.uwyo.edu") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:17:43 -0700 Received: from uwyo.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by galway.uwyo.edu (980427.SGI.8.8.8/980728.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA24026 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:24:51 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <38F20E63.84D62044@uwyo.edu> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:24:51 -0600 From: Russel Ingram Organization: Istitute for Scientific Computation/University of Wyoming X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP20) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Subject: 2 quick ?s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing I just have a couple of quick questions. The first is just to make sure that I understand fully the purpose of the ProPack -- The propack is compiled to run on x86 machines, right? The second question, then, is has anybody tried it with the new 6.2 version of Red Hat? -- Russel H. Ingram Unix Systems Administrator Institute for Scientific Computation University of Wyoming/Math Dept. Phone : (307)766-6546 E-Mail: ringram@uwyo.edu From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Mon Apr 10 10:27:04 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:26:54 -0700 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com ([204.94.214.22]:32383 "EHLO pneumatic-tube.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:26:38 -0700 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id KAA03481 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:30:29 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tduffy@dbear.engr.sgi.com) Received: from dbear.engr.sgi.com (dbear.engr.sgi.com [163.154.18.85]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id KAA19906; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:26:19 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tduffy@dbear.engr.sgi.com) Received: from localhost (tduffy@localhost) by dbear.engr.sgi.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA08351; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:22:27 -0700 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:22:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Duffy To: Russel Ingram cc: sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: 2 quick ?s In-Reply-To: <38F20E63.84D62044@uwyo.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing Well, the ProPack is for x86 machines. But we give you the source code and you are welcome to try to compile it for other architectures. The purpose of the ProPack is a method to deliver sgi's technology for linux on top of various distributions before the original vendors adopt it (if they ever do). The propack will not work on Red Hat 6.2 out of the box because it looks for redhat 6.1 or suse 6.3. I am in the process of working on the next version of the propack (1.3) that will work on redhat 6.2, suse 6.4, and turbolinux 6.0. I am also going to make sure it installs on Mandrake 7.0, but this will be unsupported (in the traditional sense). I will put an alpha of the propack 1.3 up on the webpage very soon now. I was hoping to get our kernel up to 2.2.15pre17 before putting it up, but I may put one up sooner. -tduffy On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Russel Ingram wrote: > I just have a couple of quick questions. The first is just to make > sure that I understand fully the purpose of the ProPack -- The propack > is compiled to run on x86 machines, right? The second question, then, > is has anybody tried it with the new 6.2 version of Red Hat? > > -- > Russel H. Ingram > Unix Systems Administrator > Institute for Scientific Computation > University of Wyoming/Math Dept. > Phone : (307)766-6546 > E-Mail: ringram@uwyo.edu > From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Thu Apr 13 20:06:35 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:06:15 -0700 Received: from tomts3.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.141]:31160 "EHLO tomts3-srv.bellnexxia.net") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:06:08 -0700 Received: from sympatico.ca ([216.209.33.218]) by tomts3-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.4.01.02.17 201-229-119) with ESMTP id <20000414030559.VIDP24624.tomts3-srv.bellnexxia.net@sympatico.ca> for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:05:59 -0400 Message-ID: <38F68BE3.3674324E@sympatico.ca> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:09:23 -0400 From: Luke Reeves Organization: Neurotech X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Subject: SGI ProPack Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing Are the patches included in the SGI ProPack functional with 2.2.14? Or are they already included in that kernel version? Thanks. Luke Reeves, Neurotech luke@submail.net http://www.neuro-tech.net/ http://www.submail.net/ From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Thu Apr 13 20:11:45 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:11:35 -0700 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:64787 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:11:13 -0700 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id UAA20862 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:06:29 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tduffy@dbear.engr.sgi.com) Received: from dbear.engr.sgi.com (dbear.engr.sgi.com [163.154.18.85]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id UAA30052; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:10:54 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tduffy@dbear.engr.sgi.com) Received: from localhost (tduffy@localhost) by dbear.engr.sgi.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA26393; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:10:39 -0700 Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:10:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Duffy To: Luke Reeves cc: sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: SGI ProPack In-Reply-To: <38F68BE3.3674324E@sympatico.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing Well, some of the stuff has been taken into the 2.3.x series, but not in the 2.2.x series. The next version of the propack will be 2.2.15 based and I am planning on putting a beta up real soon now on the web site. I just want to make sure it is reasonably stable before subjecting all you all to it... Of course you are welcome to try to apply patches to the 2.2.14 tree as you wish. If you look at each project's separate pages, the maintainer may have a newer patch based off newer kernels. Later, Tom Duffy On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Luke Reeves wrote: > Are the patches included in the SGI ProPack functional with 2.2.14? Or > are they already included in that kernel version? Thanks. > > Luke Reeves, Neurotech > luke@submail.net > http://www.neuro-tech.net/ > http://www.submail.net/ > From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Sat Apr 15 02:12:41 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 02:12:22 -0700 Received: from violet.jayhawks.net ([24.124.24.226]:59916 "EHLO violet.jayhawks.net") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 02:11:59 -0700 Received: from localhost (cbell@localhost) by violet.jayhawks.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA22323; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 04:11:42 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 04:11:42 -0500 (CDT) From: "Christofer C. Bell" To: sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Subject: SGI Linux ProPack 1.2 on non-SGI Hardware Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing Hello! I have been reading the documentation on the SGI Open Source website dealing with the SGI ProPack 1.2 for Linux. As a systems administrator for Sprint Long Distance, I have the opportunity to run several Origin 2000 servers in support of Sprint's billing stream. I enjoy using IRIX and I like what SGI is doing for the Linux community. I'd like to enjoy some of SGI's contributions at home. Unfortunately, having a bona-fide SGI Linux machine at home is not an option for me at this time. I am currently running a dual Celeron system with Red Hat Linux 6.1. Since owning an SGI Linux system isn't on the immediate horizion, I have the following questions: * Can the SGI Linux ProPack 1.2 be installed on Red Hat Linux 6.1 running on non-SGI hardware? * If the ProPack cannot be completely installed, what parts of the ProPack -can- be installed? * If I recall correctly, a complete install of the SGI Linux Environment 1.1 on non-SGI hardware would render the system unbootable as the kernel was specific to the 1400L server. Does the same caveat apply to the SGI supplied kernel in the Linux ProPack 1.2? * If the ProPack cannot be completely installed, will the ProPack installer recogize that it is not running on SGI hardware and act accordingly, installing as much of the software as possible? Basically, I would like as much of the ProPack as possible installed on my system, but I don't want to render the system unusable. Any advice you might be able to offer would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! -- Chris From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Sat Apr 15 11:37:34 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 11:37:25 -0700 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:11893 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 11:37:08 -0700 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id LAA04375 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 11:32:24 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tduffy@dbear.engr.sgi.com) Received: from dbear.engr.sgi.com (dbear.engr.sgi.com [163.154.18.85]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA13541; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 11:36:50 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tduffy@dbear.engr.sgi.com) Received: from localhost (tduffy@localhost) by dbear.engr.sgi.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA12180; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 11:36:31 -0700 Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 11:36:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Duffy To: "Christofer C. Bell" cc: sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: SGI Linux ProPack 1.2 on non-SGI Hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing The ProPack should work on anything that redhat 6.1 does. We try very hard not to break anything. In fact, I run it at home on my K6-2 noname box. At SGI, we have Compaq's, Dell's, HP's, and VA-linux boxen that we run our propack on. But probably most of the features that are in the SGI kernel are not "home use" features. They really enable enterprise applications. Of course feel free to try it out and send in feedback/bugs. later, -tduffy On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Christofer C. Bell wrote: > Hello! I have been reading the documentation on the SGI Open Source > website dealing with the SGI ProPack 1.2 for Linux. As a systems > administrator for Sprint Long Distance, I have the opportunity to run > several Origin 2000 servers in support of Sprint's billing stream. I > enjoy using IRIX and I like what SGI is doing for the Linux community. > I'd like to enjoy some of SGI's contributions at home. > > Unfortunately, having a bona-fide SGI Linux machine at home is not an > option for me at this time. I am currently running a dual Celeron system > with Red Hat Linux 6.1. Since owning an SGI Linux system isn't on the > immediate horizion, I have the following questions: > > * Can the SGI Linux ProPack 1.2 be installed on Red Hat Linux 6.1 running > on non-SGI hardware? > > * If the ProPack cannot be completely installed, what parts of the ProPack > -can- be installed? > > * If I recall correctly, a complete install of the SGI Linux Environment > 1.1 on non-SGI hardware would render the system unbootable as the kernel > was specific to the 1400L server. Does the same caveat apply to the > SGI supplied kernel in the Linux ProPack 1.2? > > * If the ProPack cannot be completely installed, will the ProPack > installer recogize that it is not running on SGI hardware and act > accordingly, installing as much of the software as possible? > > Basically, I would like as much of the ProPack as possible installed on my > system, but I don't want to render the system unusable. Any advice you > might be able to offer would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! > > -- > Chris > From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Sun Apr 23 06:10:46 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 06:10:37 -0700 Received: from mailserv.nbnet.nb.ca ([198.164.200.18]:51076 "EHLO quartz.nbnet.nb.ca") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 06:10:24 -0700 Received: from Lxxxx.nbtel.nb.ca ([142.166.201.198]) by quartz.nbnet.nb.ca (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-66826U105000L105000S0V35) with ESMTP id ca for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 10:10:22 -0300 From: "Marco Shaw" To: Subject: ProPack question Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 10:09:33 -0300 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20000423131022.AAA5595@quartz.nbnet.nb.ca@Lxxxx.nbtel.nb.ca> Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing I was planning to install the ProPack 'by hand' using the individual RPMs. Should I install in a particular order, with/without reboots at certain points? Thanks, Marco From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Sun Apr 23 11:55:20 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 11:55:11 -0700 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:58920 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 11:54:44 -0700 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id LAA22127 for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 11:49:58 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tduffy@dbear.engr.sgi.com) Received: from dbear.engr.sgi.com (dbear.engr.sgi.com [163.154.18.85]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA36118; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 11:54:21 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tduffy@dbear.engr.sgi.com) Received: from localhost (tduffy@localhost) by dbear.engr.sgi.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA07252; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 11:53:46 -0700 Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 11:53:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Duffy To: Marco Shaw cc: sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: ProPack question In-Reply-To: <20000423131022.AAA5595@quartz.nbnet.nb.ca@Lxxxx.nbtel.nb.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing Well, there is no real order necessary. Except it might be a good idea to do the kernel, then kernel-headers first so that the /usr/src/linux link is properly pointing to the sgi kernel. And the only reboot should be when you are done installing everything and want to boot our kernel (remember to keep your old kernel around just in case -- meaning don't to a rpm -U on the kernel, instead do a rpm -i). Hope this helps. -tduffy On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Marco Shaw wrote: > I was planning to install the ProPack 'by hand' using the individual RPMs. > Should I install in a particular order, with/without reboots at certain > points? > > Thanks, > Marco > From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Mon Apr 24 11:31:13 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 11:31:02 -0700 Received: from mailserv.nbnet.nb.ca ([198.164.200.18]:20143 "EHLO quartz.nbnet.nb.ca") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 11:30:58 -0700 Received: from Lxxxx.nbtel.nb.ca ([142.166.201.198]) by quartz.nbnet.nb.ca (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-66826U105000L105000S0V35) with ESMTP id ca for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 15:30:56 -0300 From: "Marco Shaw" To: Subject: ProPack 1.2 only for Intel CPUs? Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 15:30:00 -0300 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20000424183056.AAA7565@quartz.nbnet.nb.ca@Lxxxx.nbtel.nb.ca> Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing Tried booting the i386 1.2 package on my home 486 computer... Just wanted to make sure that it isn't compiled specifically for Intel's, since I don't have a true Intel CPU. I'm getting a kernel panic on reboot: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address... Thanks, Marco From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Mon Apr 24 11:46:53 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 11:46:43 -0700 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:59729 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 11:46:24 -0700 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id LAA17963 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 11:41:37 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tduffy@dbear.engr.sgi.com) Received: from dbear.engr.sgi.com (dbear.engr.sgi.com [163.154.18.85]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA30940; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 11:46:00 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tduffy@dbear.engr.sgi.com) Received: from localhost (tduffy@localhost) by dbear.engr.sgi.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA29612; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 11:45:23 -0700 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 11:45:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Duffy To: Marco Shaw cc: sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: ProPack 1.2 only for Intel CPUs? In-Reply-To: <20000424183056.AAA7565@quartz.nbnet.nb.ca@Lxxxx.nbtel.nb.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing can you please send more information, like where it was panicing...and what kernel you have installed, etc. I have tested the propack on AMD K6-2's and Athlons...Haven't tried Cyrix or Winchips. I don't have a 486 or 386 anywhere to test, but make sure you are using the 386 kernel. -tduffy On Mon, 24 Apr 2000, Marco Shaw wrote: > Tried booting the i386 1.2 package on my home 486 computer... Just wanted > to make sure that it isn't compiled specifically for Intel's, since I don't > have a true Intel CPU. > > I'm getting a kernel panic on reboot: > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address... > > > Thanks, > Marco > From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Mon Apr 24 14:03:56 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 14:03:37 -0700 Received: from [212.216.176.76] ([212.216.176.76]:56755 "EHLO fep23-svc.tin.it") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 14:03:09 -0700 Received: from dada ([212.171.173.169]) by fep23-svc.tin.it (InterMail vM.4.01.02.17 201-229-119) with SMTP id <20000424210249.WRRZ16919.fep23-svc.tin.it@dada>; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 23:02:49 +0200 Message-ID: <000f01bfae31$1bc21d00$a9adabd4@casa.it> From: "Daniele Medri" To: "Marco Shaw" , References: <20000423131022.AAA5595@quartz.nbnet.nb.ca@Lxxxx.nbtel.nb.ca> Subject: Re: ProPack question Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 23:06:10 +0200 Organization: ErLug (Emilia Romagna Linux User Group) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing Daniele Medri Presidente ErLug (Emilia Romagna Linux User Group) web: http://erlug.linux.it - email: madrid@linux.it / madrid@kjws.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marco Shaw" To: Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2000 3:09 PM Subject: ProPack question > I was planning to install the ProPack 'by hand' using the individual RPMs. > Should I install in a particular order, with/without reboots at certain > points? Hi, i'm testing linux on sgi 320... but i can't able to install latest kernel than the monolitic for installation. Someone has tryied better solution? I need a kernel with smp+hidb+frame buffer... I try to compile too latest 2.3.99-3... but the compilation with sgi-options fails for svw_ioapic.... and i think that isn't more supporterd by sgi linux developer... other news about? Daniele Medri From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Tue Apr 25 04:13:55 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 04:13:36 -0700 Received: from mailserv.nbnet.nb.ca ([198.164.200.18]:31877 "EHLO quartz.nbnet.nb.ca") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 04:13:19 -0700 Received: from Lxxxx.nbtel.nb.ca ([142.134.174.18]) by quartz.nbnet.nb.ca (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-66826U105000L105000S0V35) with ESMTP id ca for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 08:13:17 -0300 From: "Marco Shaw" To: Subject: Re: ProPack 1.2 only for Intel CPUs? Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 07:28:36 -0300 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20000425111317.AAA16413@quartz.nbnet.nb.ca@Lxxxx.nbtel.nb.ca> Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing My apologies, I tried to make an init ram disk (which failed with a few errors), and this was my boot up problem. I don't have such 'exotic' h/w that one is needed. The system boots fine now, except for some unresolved symbols with modules... Thanks, Marco ---------- > From: Marco Shaw > To: sgilinux@oss.sgi.com > Subject: ProPack 1.2 only for Intel CPUs? > Date: April 24, 2000 3:30 PM > > Tried booting the i386 1.2 package on my home 486 computer... Just wanted > to make sure that it isn't compiled specifically for Intel's, since I don't > have a true Intel CPU. > > I'm getting a kernel panic on reboot: > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address... > > > Thanks, > Marco From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Wed Apr 26 05:47:56 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 05:47:45 -0700 Received: from mailserv.nbnet.nb.ca ([198.164.200.18]:60615 "EHLO quartz.nbnet.nb.ca") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 05:47:39 -0700 Received: from Lxxxx.nbtel.nb.ca ([142.134.174.18]) by quartz.nbnet.nb.ca (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-66826U105000L105000S0V35) with ESMTP id ca for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 09:47:32 -0300 From: "Marco Shaw" To: Subject: ProPack 1.3 status? Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 09:46:28 -0300 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20000426124732.AAA15199@quartz.nbnet.nb.ca@Lxxxx.nbtel.nb.ca> Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing I may have missed an annoucement... I see ProPack 1.3 on the FTP site. What's the status of this release? Alpha/beta/ready for production? Thanks, Marco From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Wed Apr 26 06:56:25 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 06:56:16 -0700 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:56883 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 06:56:10 -0700 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id GAA27609 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 06:51:22 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tduffy@dbear.engr.sgi.com) Received: from dbear.engr.sgi.com (dbear.engr.sgi.com [163.154.18.85]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id GAA80835; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 06:55:49 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tduffy@dbear.engr.sgi.com) Received: from localhost (tduffy@localhost) by dbear.engr.sgi.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA13846; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 06:55:07 -0700 Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 06:55:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Duffy To: Marco Shaw cc: sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: ProPack 1.3 status? In-Reply-To: <20000426124732.AAA15199@quartz.nbnet.nb.ca@Lxxxx.nbtel.nb.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing It is most definately some sorta alpha or beta. Treat it with caution. -tduffy On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Marco Shaw wrote: > I may have missed an annoucement... > > I see ProPack 1.3 on the FTP site. What's the status of this release? > Alpha/beta/ready for production? > > Thanks, > Marco > From owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Thu Apr 27 06:06:39 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 06:06:30 -0700 Received: from maes.esrin.esa.it ([192.106.252.50]:30943 "EHLO maes.esrin.esa.it") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 06:06:05 -0700 Received: from plod.esrin.esa.it (firewall-user@gatekeeper2 [192.106.252.70]) by maes.esrin.esa.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA04378; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 15:08:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from penelope.rsp.it by plod.esrin.esa.it (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id NAA03928; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:07:40 GMT Received: from esrin.esa.it (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by penelope.rsp.it (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA11037; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:03:35 GMT Message-ID: <39083AA6.7C4B550F@esrin.esa.it> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:03:35 +0000 From: Gabriele Brugnoni Organization: ESRIN X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.7 sun4m) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sgilinux@oss.sgi.com CC: Thomas Duffy Subject: SGI 540 References: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------EE249E972162CF512EABADBC" Sender: owner-sgilinux@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;sgilinux-outgoing This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------EE249E972162CF512EABADBC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I read from some e-mail sent in March that you planned to have new kernel available for the SGI540. I also read that other people have keyboard problems. I have installed Mandrake 6.1-1 on my SGI 540. In single CPU it works fine. With a multiCPU kernel (based on your information on http://www.linux.sgi.com) I am not able to use the keybord .. via telnet everything is fine! In attach you will find the log file I get at boot time .. probably it could help. regards Gabriele --------------EE249E972162CF512EABADBC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; name="dmesg.boot_log_sgi540" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="dmesg.boot_log_sgi540" c version pgcc-2.91.66 19990314 (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #2 SMP Thu Apr 27 08:17:14 EDT 2000 Silicon Graphics 540 (rev 2) VISWS HACK: hard-wiring physical mem size to 128Mb VISWS HACK: taking 16Mb for gfx memory -- leaving 240Mb for kernel sgivw_gfx_mem_phys f000000 Processor #0 Pentium(tm) Pro APIC version 17 Processor #1 Pentium(tm) Pro APIC version 17 Processor #2 Pentium(tm) Pro APIC version 17 Processor #3 Pentium(tm) Pro APIC version 17 mapped APIC to ffffe000 (fee00000) Lithium PCI Bridge A, Bus Number: 1 Lithium PCI Bridge B (PIIX4), Bus Number: 0 Local APIC ID 0 Local APIC Version 40011 Cobalt Revision a5 Cobalt APIC ID 44000000 Cobalt APIC enabled: ID reg 44000100 WARNING: ASSIGN_IRQ_VECTOR wrapped back to 52 WARNING: ASSIGN_IRQ_VECTOR wrapped back to 53 IRQ 28, Cobalt APIC Entry 12, IDT Vector 82: enabling Detected 551290253 Hz processor. Starting Cobalt Timer system clock IRQ 0, Cobalt APIC Entry 28, IDT Vector 51: enabling Console: colour dummy device 80x25 Calibrating delay loop... 548.86 BogoMIPS Memory: 241472k/245760k available (1064k kernel code, 416k reserved, 2736k data, 72k init) Checking 386/387 coupling... OK, FPU using exception 16 error reporting. Checking 'hlt' instruction... disabled POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX per-CPU timeslice cutoff: 100.05 usecs. CPU0: Intel 00/07 stepping 03 calibrating APIC timer ... ..... CPU clock speed is 551.2423 MHz. ..... system bus clock speed is 100.2256 MHz. Booting processor 1 eip 2000 Calibrating delay loop... 548.86 BogoMIPS OK. CPU1: Intel 00/07 stepping 03 Booting processor 2 eip 2000 Calibrating delay loop... 548.86 BogoMIPS OK. CPU2: Intel 00/07 stepping 03 Booting processor 3 eip 2000 Calibrating delay loop... 548.86 BogoMIPS OK. CPU3: Intel 00/07 stepping 03 Total of 4 processors activated (2195.46 BogoMIPS). PCI: Using configuration type 1 PCI: Probing PCI hardware PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I4,P3) -> 23 PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B1,I2,P0) -> 18 PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B1,I3,P0) -> 19 Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.2 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0 for Linux NET4.0. NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0 IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP Starting kswapd v 1.5 IRQ 23, Cobalt APIC Entry 7, IDT Vector 5a: enabling USB HID boot protocol mouse registered. sgivwfb: framebuffer at 0xf000000, size 16384k sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: i2c wait-state timeout. sgivwfb: Unknown flatpanel type 0 detected. sgivwfb: new video mode xres=800 yres=600 bpp=8 vxres=800 vyres=600 Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 100x37 fb0: Virtual frame buffer device, using 16384K of video memory Detected PS/2 Mouse Port. Serial driver version 4.27 with no serial options enabled ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A ttyS01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured probe_vwsnd: lithium audio found usb_hub_thread at c01d4720 keyboard: Too many NACKs -- noisy kbd cable? keyboard: Too many NACKs -- noisy kbd cable? uhci_control_thread at c01d2b14 IRQ 38, Cobalt APIC Entry 22, IDT Vector d2: enabling PIIX4: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 21 PIIX4: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later ide0: BM-DMA at 0x2020-0x2027, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio ide1: BM-DMA at 0x2028-0x202f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio hda: IRQ probe failed (0) hda: IRQ probe failed (0) hda: CD-532E-A, ATAPI CDROM drive hda: IRQ probe failed (0) hdb: IRQ probe failed (0) hdb: IRQ probe failed (0) hdb: IOMEGA ZIP 100 ATAPI, ATAPI FLOPPY drive hdb: IRQ probe failed (0) IRQ 14, Cobalt APIC Entry 4, IDT Vector c1: enabling ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 hda: ATAPI 32X CD-ROM drive, 128kB Cache Uniform CDROM driver Revision: 2.55 VISWS HACK: floppy drive 0 hardwired to 1.44Mb (cmos WAR) VISWS HACK: floppy drive 1 hardwired to (none) (cmos WAR) Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M, fd1 is unknown type 16 (usb?) FDC 0 is a National Semiconductor PC87306 (scsi): Found a QLA1080 @ bus 1, device 2, irq 18, iobase 0xa000 (scsi): Initializing Adapter; Please wait ... scsi(0): Determining if RISC is loaded... scsi(0): Verifying chip... scsi(0): Configure NVRAM parameters... scsi(0): Resetting SCSI BUS (0) IRQ 18, Cobalt APIC Entry 2, IDT Vector e1: enabling scsi0 : QLogic QLA1080 PCI to SCSI Host Adapter: bus 1 device 2 irq 18 Version: 1.20-Beta, Firmware version: 8.9.0 scsi1 : SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE ATAPI devices scsi : 2 hosts. Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address f000c218 current->tss.cr3 = 00101000, %cr3 = 00101000 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0002 CPU: 0 EIP: 0010:[] EFLAGS: 00010202 eax: f000c1f0 ebx: c04d6000 ecx: c04fe188 edx: 00000061 esi: c04fe008 edi: c04d7e78 ebp: c04fe108 esp: c04d7e6c ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018 Process uhci-control (pid: 5, process nr: 8, stackpage=c04d7000) Stack: c04fe108 c04fe148 c04d7e78 c04d6000 c025b0fc c01d234e c04fe000 c04fe108 c04fe188 c0011c00 00000008 c0011c14 c0011c14 c04d7edc 3c800000 c04fe108 c04fe000 c01d3a58 c0011c00 00000000 c04d7ed4 c0011c1c 00000000 00000000 Call Trace: [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] Code: 89 70 28 f6 00 01 74 dc 8b 4c 24 28 51 55 56 e8 e4 fb ff ff Vendor: SEAGATE Model: ST118202LC Rev: 0006 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 Detected scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 scsi(0:0:0:0): Enabled tagged queuing, queue depth 255. Vendor: IOMEGA Model: ZIP 100 Rev: 12.A Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 00 Detected scsi removable disk sdb at scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 scsi : detected 2 SCSI disks total. SCSI device sda: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 35566480 [17366 MB] [17.4 GB] sdb : READ CAPACITY failed. sdb : status = 0, message = 00, host = 0, driver = 28 sdb : extended sense code = 2 sdb : block size assumed to be 512 bytes, disk size 1GB. eth0: Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100 at 0xa100, 08:00:69:12:E6:01, IRQ 19. Board assembly 123456-120, Physical connectors present: RJ45 Primary interface chip DP83840 PHY #1. DP83840 specific setup, setting register 23 to 0422. General self-test: passed. Serial sub-system self-test: passed. Internal registers self-test: passed. ROM checksum self-test: passed (0x04f4518b). Receiver lock-up workaround activated. Partition check: sda: sda1 sda2 < sda5 sda6 sda7 sda8 sda9 sda10 sda11 sda12 > sdb:scsidisk I/O error: dev 08:10, sector 0 unable to read partition table hdb:<3>ide-scsi: hdb: unsupported command in request queue (0) end_request: I/O error, dev 03:40 (hdb), sector 0 unable to read partition table VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly. Freeing unused kernel memory: 72k freed Adding Swap: 136516k swap-space (priority -1) Adding Swap: 136516k swap-space (priority -2) Adding Swap: 136516k swap-space (priority -3) Adding Swap: 136516k swap-space (priority -4) --------------EE249E972162CF512EABADBC--