From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Thu Jul 6 17:02:02 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 17:01:52 -0700 Received: from chamfs.chameleonsystems.com ([208.177.165.131]:61145 "EHLO chamfs.chameleonsystems.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 17:01:31 -0700 Received: from chamfs (tang@chamfs.chameleonsystems.com [192.168.1.10]) by chamfs.chameleonsystems.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA17102 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 17:01:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 17:01:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Xinan Tang X-Sender: tang@chamfs To: pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Subject: "Have any one tried to run nue under suse 6.4" In-Reply-To: <00061916351000.01998@tcdec3> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing Hi I just installed nue on top of SuSE 6.4 but could not run through. Here is what I received: ___________________________________________________________ linux-box:~ #nue sorry don't know how to deal with your libc (too new or too old) _________________________ Any suggestion how to get over this? Thanks --Tang From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Thu Jul 6 17:05:31 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 17:05:11 -0700 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:45656 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 17:05:00 -0700 Received: from cchkms.engr.sgi.com (cchkms.engr.sgi.com [130.62.180.48]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id RAA03347 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 17:00:09 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (rat@cchkms.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from rat@localhost) by cchkms.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id RAA11298; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 17:03:49 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ross A. Towle" Message-Id: <10007061703.ZM11454@cchkms.engr.sgi.com> Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 17:03:48 -0700 In-Reply-To: Xinan Tang ""Have any one tried to run nue under suse 6.4"" (Jul 6, 5:01pm) References: X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail) To: Xinan Tang , pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: "Have any one tried to run nue under suse 6.4" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing I would suggest that you ask the HP folks about this one. NUE and libc both come from them. -Ross A. Towle From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Fri Jul 7 03:06:20 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 03:06:10 -0700 Received: from mailer3.bham.ac.uk ([147.188.128.54]:45479 "EHLO mailer3.bham.ac.uk") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 03:05:55 -0700 Received: from bham.ac.uk ([147.188.128.127]) by mailer3.bham.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #16) id 13AV1G-0004s7-00; Fri, 07 Jul 2000 11:06:02 +0100 Received: from tcpc3.bham.ac.uk ([147.188.105.7] ident=root) by bham.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.10 #1) id 13AV1G-0000Zg-00; Fri, 07 Jul 2000 11:06:02 +0100 Received: from tcdec3 (sjm@tcdec3.bham.ac.uk [147.188.105.127]) by tcpc3.bham.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA22549; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 11:06:01 +0100 From: Stuart McNicholas To: Xinan Tang , pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: "Have any one tried to run nue under suse 6.4" Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 11:06:01 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.50] Content-Type: text/plain References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00070711060100.12144@tcdec3> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing Simple fix. Look at /usr/bin/nue. It's a shell script that uses some Red Hat Magic to determine libc version. Not very portable. Just type nue-glibc21 instead. Stuart On Fri, 07 Jul 2000, Xinan Tang wrote: > Hi > > I just installed nue on top of SuSE 6.4 but could not run through. > > Here is what I received: > > ___________________________________________________________ > linux-box:~ #nue > sorry don't know how to deal with your libc (too new or too old) > _________________________ > > Any suggestion how to get over this? > > Thanks > > --Tang From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Fri Jul 7 14:51:33 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 14:51:23 -0700 Received: from chamfs.chameleonsystems.com ([208.177.165.131]:8187 "EHLO chamfs.chameleonsystems.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 14:50:54 -0700 Received: from chamfs (tang@chamfs.chameleonsystems.com [192.168.1.10]) by chamfs.chameleonsystems.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA05949 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 14:50:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 14:50:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Xinan Tang X-Sender: tang@chamfs To: pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Subject: 'Error message on installing pro64.rpm" In-Reply-To: <00070711060100.12144@tcdec3> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing Hi When I was installing pro64-0.01.0-9-ia64.rpm, I received this messages: ___________________________________________________ failed to open /etc/mtab: No such file or directory __________________________________________________ Can I ignore this error message? Thanks --Tang From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Fri Jul 7 16:32:22 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 16:32:03 -0700 Received: from chamfs.chameleonsystems.com ([208.177.165.131]:62348 "EHLO chamfs.chameleonsystems.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 16:31:41 -0700 Received: from chamfs (tang@chamfs.chameleonsystems.com [192.168.1.10]) by chamfs.chameleonsystems.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA18646 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 16:31:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 16:31:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Xinan Tang X-Sender: tang@chamfs To: pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Subject: "Generating 32-bit instruction" In-Reply-To: <393E8974.DDBB9FDF@sgi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing Hi What is the sgicc switch that forces the compiler generating 32-bits instructions rather than 64-bit ones. I would like to use the PamHall suite to test sgicc and I am not sure all test cases are 64-bit clean. Thanks --Tang From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Fri Jul 7 16:59:52 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 16:59:43 -0700 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com ([204.94.214.22]:40548 "EHLO pneumatic-tube.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 16:59:17 -0700 Received: from cchkms.engr.sgi.com (cchkms.engr.sgi.com [130.62.180.48]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id RAA01219 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 17:04:53 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (rat@cchkms.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from rat@localhost) by cchkms.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA21362; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 16:58:05 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ross A. Towle" Message-Id: <10007071658.ZM21034@cchkms.engr.sgi.com> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 16:58:04 -0700 In-Reply-To: Xinan Tang ""Generating 32-bit instruction"" (Jul 7, 4:31pm) References: X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail) To: Xinan Tang , pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: "Generating 32-bit instruction" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing On Jul 7, 4:31pm, Xinan Tang wrote: > Subject: "Generating 32-bit instruction" > Hi > > What is the sgicc switch that forces the compiler > generating 32-bits instructions rather than 64-bit ones. > > I would like to use the PamHall suite to test sgicc and > I am not sure all test cases are 64-bit clean. > > Thanks > > --Tang > > >-- End of excerpt from Xinan Tang If your question is how can I generate IA-32 instructions from sgicc then answer is you can't until somebody creates a backend that generates IA-32 operations. If your question is how can I compile a program using the ILP32 data model (sizeof(int) == sizeof(long) == sizeof(void *) == 4) instead of the the LP64 ( sizeof(long) == sizeof(void *) == 8) which is the data model specified by the IA64 ABI, then the answer is there is no switch for that. The libc on IA6s4 you need to link with is built using the LP64 data model so you will have tons of problems. -Ross A. Towle From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Tue Jul 11 15:26:13 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 15:26:04 -0700 Received: from uni-paderborn.de ([131.234.22.30]:60368 "EHLO uni-paderborn.de") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 15:25:45 -0700 Received: from pcpc8 ([131.234.92.77]:3372 "EHLO pcpc8.uni-paderborn.de") by mail.uni-paderborn.de with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 16:42:41 +0200 Received: (from krawi@localhost) by pcpc8.uni-paderborn.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA07009 for pro64-support@oss.sgi.com; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 16:42:31 +0200 Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 16:42:31 +0200 From: Andreas Krawinkel To: pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Subject: native ia64 compiler Message-ID: <20000711164231.Z1640@upb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.12i Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing Hi, I have a real ia64 machine in our institute. So I would be very interested in have a real compiler which can be used on that machine and not into the nue. Please can you tell me when I can expect the pro64 for the native Itanium? Thanx in advance Andreas Krawinkel -- -------- Andreas Krawinkel voice : +49 5251 60-6303 |PC2 / / | Paderborn Center for fax : +49 5251 60-6297 | / / | Parallel Computing mail : krawi@upb.de | / / | Fuerstenallee 11 url : http://www.upb.de/pc2/ -------- 33102 Paderborn, Germany office: F0.343 From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Wed Jul 12 14:39:58 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 14:39:38 -0700 Received: from hq.tensilica.com ([170.1.198.29]:34813 "EHLO mail-in.hq.tensilica.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 14:39:33 -0700 Received: from sarangi (sarangi.hq.tensilica.com [192.168.10.117]) by mail-in.hq.tensilica.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA21321 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 14:39:36 -0700 Message-ID: <041301bfec49$71c95190$750aa8c0@hq.tensilica.com> From: "Steven Tjiang" To: "Pro64 Support Mailing List" Subject: simple program crashes pro64 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 14:37:55 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0410_01BFEC0E.C449A040" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0410_01BFEC0E.C449A040 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The following program doesn't compile under my pro64 compiler. I get the following error message: :; sgicc -S -O2 -Wb,-trlow longdouble01.c longdouble01.c: In function `main': longdouble01.c:10: Internal compiler error in `emit_move_insn', at expr.c:2523 Please submit a Case to Cygnus Solutions via the web at support.cygnus.com. This works on my native ia32 gcc compiler. Anybody encountered this yet? ------=_NextPart_000_0410_01BFEC0E.C449A040 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="longdouble01.c" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="longdouble01.c" /* Test long double parameters */=0A= typedef __complex__ double bigint;=0A= bigint d()=0A= {=0A= return 1;=0A= }=0A= =0A= main()=0A= {=0A= printf("%llf", d());=0A= }=0A= ------=_NextPart_000_0410_01BFEC0E.C449A040-- From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Wed Jul 12 14:47:39 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 14:47:29 -0700 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:63562 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 14:47:22 -0700 Received: from cchkms.engr.sgi.com (cchkms.engr.sgi.com [130.62.180.48]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id OAA20997 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 14:40:02 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (rat@cchkms.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from rat@localhost) by cchkms.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA60499; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 14:46:10 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ross A. Towle" Message-Id: <10007121446.ZM59825@cchkms.engr.sgi.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 14:46:08 -0700 In-Reply-To: "Steven Tjiang" "simple program crashes pro64" (Jul 12, 2:37pm) References: <041301bfec49$71c95190$750aa8c0@hq.tensilica.com> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail) To: "Steven Tjiang" , "Pro64 Support Mailing List" Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing At this time Pro64 does not support "long double" -Ross A Towle From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Wed Jul 12 14:53:48 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 14:53:38 -0700 Received: from hq.tensilica.com ([170.1.198.29]:51440 "EHLO mail-in.hq.tensilica.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 14:53:34 -0700 Received: from sarangi (sarangi.hq.tensilica.com [192.168.10.117]) by mail-in.hq.tensilica.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA21656; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 14:52:31 -0700 Message-ID: <042b01bfec4b$13a1b3d0$750aa8c0@hq.tensilica.com> From: "Steven Tjiang" To: "Ross A. Towle" , "Pro64 Support Mailing List" References: <041301bfec49$71c95190$750aa8c0@hq.tensilica.com> <10007121446.ZM59825@cchkms.engr.sgi.com> Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 14:49:37 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing Actually the program is a misnomer, it doesn't contain any "long double" just "__complex__ double". I would have thought that this is a common fortran data type, albeit I am trying to access it through the C front-end. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ross A. Towle" To: "Steven Tjiang" ; "Pro64 Support Mailing List" Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 2:46 PM Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 > At this time Pro64 does not support "long double" > > -Ross A Towle > From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Wed Jul 12 15:58:09 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 15:57:59 -0700 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:61542 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 15:57:50 -0700 Received: from gaea.engr.sgi.com (gaea.engr.sgi.com [130.62.180.97]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id PAA05246 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 15:50:30 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (murthy@gaea.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from murthy@localhost) by gaea.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA26426; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 15:55:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 15:55:17 -0700 (PDT) From: murthy@gaea.engr.sgi.com (Chandrasekhar Murthy) Message-Id: <200007122255.PAA26426@gaea.engr.sgi.com> To: "Pro64 Support Mailing List" , "Steven Tjiang" Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing Does it fail if you also add the following include #include Murthy From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Wed Jul 12 16:06:48 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:06:29 -0700 Received: from hq.tensilica.com ([170.1.198.29]:65274 "EHLO mail-in.hq.tensilica.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:06:26 -0700 Received: from sarangi (sarangi.hq.tensilica.com [192.168.10.117]) by mail-in.hq.tensilica.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA23337; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:06:27 -0700 Message-ID: <050501bfec55$09dc96d0$750aa8c0@hq.tensilica.com> From: "Steven Tjiang" To: "Chandrasekhar Murthy" , "Pro64 Support Mailing List" References: <200007122255.PAA26426@gaea.engr.sgi.com> Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:00:49 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing Adding then include allow compilation to finish. Thanks. But should it have crashed in the first place? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chandrasekhar Murthy" To: "Pro64 Support Mailing List" ; "Steven Tjiang" Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 3:55 PM Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 > Does it fail if you also add the following include > > #include > > Murthy > From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Wed Jul 12 16:06:48 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:06:29 -0700 Received: from hq.tensilica.com ([170.1.198.29]:57594 "EHLO mail-in.hq.tensilica.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:06:22 -0700 Received: from sarangi (sarangi.hq.tensilica.com [192.168.10.117]) by mail-in.hq.tensilica.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA23342; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:06:28 -0700 Message-ID: <050601bfec55$0a93d8e0$750aa8c0@hq.tensilica.com> From: "Steven Tjiang" To: "Chandrasekhar Murthy" , "Pro64 Support Mailing List" References: <200007122255.PAA26426@gaea.engr.sgi.com> Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:00:55 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing Adding then include allow compilation to finish. Thanks. But should it have crashed in the first place? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chandrasekhar Murthy" To: "Pro64 Support Mailing List" ; "Steven Tjiang" Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 3:55 PM Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 > Does it fail if you also add the following include > > #include > > Murthy > From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Wed Jul 12 16:24:18 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:23:59 -0700 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com ([204.94.214.22]:29490 "EHLO pneumatic-tube.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:23:48 -0700 Received: from gaea.engr.sgi.com (gaea.engr.sgi.com [130.62.180.97]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id QAA08565 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:29:29 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (murthy@sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gaea.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA25356; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:22:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <396CFDC0.F406C3FA@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:22:40 -0700 From: Chandrasekhar Murthy X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP32) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Tjiang CC: Pro64 Support Mailing List Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 References: <200007122255.PAA26426@gaea.engr.sgi.com> <050501bfec55$09dc96d0$750aa8c0@hq.tensilica.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing Steven Tjiang wrote: > > Adding then include allow compilation to finish. Thanks. > But should it have crashed in the first place? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chandrasekhar Murthy" > To: "Pro64 Support Mailing List" ; "Steven > Tjiang" > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 3:55 PM > Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 > > > Does it fail if you also add the following include > > > > #include > > > > Murthy > > No it should not have crashed at compile time. However, you need the include in order to get the right runt time behavior because of varargs. I will take a look at the compile time failure. From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Wed Jul 12 16:50:48 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:50:38 -0700 Received: from hq.tensilica.com ([170.1.198.29]:48380 "EHLO mail-in.hq.tensilica.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:50:27 -0700 Received: from sarangi (sarangi.hq.tensilica.com [192.168.10.117]) by mail-in.hq.tensilica.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA24337; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:50:00 -0700 Message-ID: <052b01bfec5b$c0decff0$750aa8c0@hq.tensilica.com> From: "Steven Tjiang" To: "Chandrasekhar Murthy" Cc: "Pro64 Support Mailing List" References: <200007122255.PAA26426@gaea.engr.sgi.com> <050501bfec55$09dc96d0$750aa8c0@hq.tensilica.com> <396CFDC0.F406C3FA@sgi.com> Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:48:56 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing Hi. Thanks for your help. Though the program now compiles, the assembler output appears incorrect. The assembler code discards the return value of the call to d() and instead passes the value of an undefined symbol .preg_C8 to the printf. It is interesting that .preg_C8 is the special symbol used for all pseudo registers of type C8. On further examination of the trace file, a phase named "WN_lower: Pre-Opt" rewrites the operations on complex data types to operations on doubles (i.e. revealing the real and imaginary operations for the optimizer), but the phase fails to rewrite the parameters of the printf. Therefore, the lowered code has no use and the optimizer subsequently removes the code. This results in the hanging reference to a pseudo register of type C8, hence the reference to .preg_C8. Is this diagnoses correct? It seems like a proper fix would include modifying the lowering phase to rewrite actual parameters of complex types but I don't know enough about the compiler to see other repercussions of such a change. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chandrasekhar Murthy" To: "Steven Tjiang" Cc: "Pro64 Support Mailing List" Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 4:22 PM Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 > Steven Tjiang wrote: > > > > Adding then include allow compilation to finish. Thanks. > > But should it have crashed in the first place? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Chandrasekhar Murthy" > > To: "Pro64 Support Mailing List" ; "Steven > > Tjiang" > > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 3:55 PM > > Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 > > > > > Does it fail if you also add the following include > > > > > > #include > > > > > > Murthy > > > > > No it should not have crashed at compile time. > However, you need the include in order to get > the right runt time behavior because of varargs. > > I will take a look at the compile time failure. > From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Wed Jul 12 16:50:59 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:50:49 -0700 Received: from hq.tensilica.com ([170.1.198.29]:59644 "EHLO mail-in.hq.tensilica.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:50:41 -0700 Received: from sarangi (sarangi.hq.tensilica.com [192.168.10.117]) by mail-in.hq.tensilica.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA24348; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:50:20 -0700 Message-ID: <052e01bfec5b$cb974210$750aa8c0@hq.tensilica.com> From: "Steven Tjiang" To: "Chandrasekhar Murthy" Cc: "Pro64 Support Mailing List" References: <200007122255.PAA26426@gaea.engr.sgi.com> <050501bfec55$09dc96d0$750aa8c0@hq.tensilica.com> <396CFDC0.F406C3FA@sgi.com> Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:49:13 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing Hi. Thanks for your help. Though the program now compiles, the assembler output appears incorrect. The assembler code discards the return value of the call to d() and instead passes the value of an undefined symbol .preg_C8 to the printf. It is interesting that .preg_C8 is the special symbol used for all pseudo registers of type C8. On further examination of the trace file, a phase named "WN_lower: Pre-Opt" rewrites the operations on complex data types to operations on doubles (i.e. revealing the real and imaginary operations for the optimizer), but the phase fails to rewrite the parameters of the printf. Therefore, the lowered code has no use and the optimizer subsequently removes the code. This results in the hanging reference to a pseudo register of type C8, hence the reference to .preg_C8. Is this diagnoses correct? It seems like a proper fix would include modifying the lowering phase to rewrite actual parameters of complex types but I don't know enough about the compiler to see other repercussions of such a change. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chandrasekhar Murthy" To: "Steven Tjiang" Cc: "Pro64 Support Mailing List" Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 4:22 PM Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 > Steven Tjiang wrote: > > > > Adding then include allow compilation to finish. Thanks. > > But should it have crashed in the first place? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Chandrasekhar Murthy" > > To: "Pro64 Support Mailing List" ; "Steven > > Tjiang" > > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 3:55 PM > > Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 > > > > > Does it fail if you also add the following include > > > > > > #include > > > > > > Murthy > > > > > No it should not have crashed at compile time. > However, you need the include in order to get > the right runt time behavior because of varargs. > > I will take a look at the compile time failure. > From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Wed Jul 12 23:32:41 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:32:21 -0700 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com ([204.94.214.22]:26703 "EHLO pneumatic-tube.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:32:04 -0700 Received: from gaea.engr.sgi.com (gaea.engr.sgi.com [130.62.180.97]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id XAA02447 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:37:45 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (murthy@sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gaea.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id XAA21803; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:30:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <396D6210.6635EC48@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:30:41 -0700 From: Chandrasekhar Murthy X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP32) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Tjiang CC: Pro64 Support Mailing List Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 References: <200007122255.PAA26426@gaea.engr.sgi.com> <050501bfec55$09dc96d0$750aa8c0@hq.tensilica.com> <396CFDC0.F406C3FA@sgi.com> <052b01bfec5b$c0decff0$750aa8c0@hq.tensilica.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing Steven Tjiang wrote: > > Hi. > > Thanks for your help. > > Though the program now compiles, the assembler > output appears incorrect. The assembler code discards the > return value of the call to d() and instead passes the value of > an undefined symbol .preg_C8 to the printf. It is interesting that > .preg_C8 is the special symbol used for all pseudo registers of type > C8. > > On further examination of the trace file, a phase named > "WN_lower: Pre-Opt" rewrites the operations on complex > data types to operations on doubles (i.e. revealing the > real and imaginary operations for the optimizer), but the > phase fails to rewrite the parameters of the printf. Therefore, > the lowered code has no use and the optimizer subsequently removes > the code. This results in the hanging reference to a pseudo register > of type C8, hence the reference to .preg_C8. > > Is this diagnoses correct? It seems like a proper fix would include > modifying the lowering phase to rewrite actual parameters of complex types > but I don't know enough about the compiler to see other repercussions > of such a change. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chandrasekhar Murthy" > To: "Steven Tjiang" > Cc: "Pro64 Support Mailing List" > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 4:22 PM > Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 > > > Steven Tjiang wrote: > > > > > > Adding then include allow compilation to finish. Thanks. > > > But should it have crashed in the first place? > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Chandrasekhar Murthy" > > > To: "Pro64 Support Mailing List" ; "Steven > > > Tjiang" > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 3:55 PM > > > Subject: Re: simple program crashes pro64 > > > > > > > Does it fail if you also add the following include > > > > > > > > #include > > > > > > > > Murthy > > > > > > > > No it should not have crashed at compile time. > > However, you need the include in order to get > > the right runt time behavior because of varargs. > > > > I will take a look at the compile time failure. > > It appears to be a lowering problem. One workaround would be to rewrite the program as follows #include typedef __complex__ double bigint; bigint d() { return 1; } main () { bigint e; e = d(); printf("%llf", e); } The output is then the same with sgicc as with the stock gcc compiler, but it is still does not look correct. From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Tue Jul 25 08:46:48 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 08:46:38 -0700 Received: from mail.ee.gatech.edu ([130.207.230.10]:42675 "EHLO mail.ee.gatech.edu") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 08:46:18 -0700 Received: from moa.eecom.gatech.edu (IDENT:root@moa.eecom.gatech.edu [130.207.231.199]) by mail.ee.gatech.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA14833 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 11:45:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from hardnett@localhost) by moa.eecom.gatech.edu (8.9.3/8.8.4) id LAA23091; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 11:45:36 -0400 From: Charles Hardnett MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14717.46624.214922.32972@moa.eecom.gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 11:45:36 -0400 (EDT) To: pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Subject: Problem Collecting Trace Info X-Mailer: VM 6.71 under 21.1 (patch 4) "Arches" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: hardnett@cc.gatech.edu Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing Hi, I have been trying to get the trace information out of the BE of the SGIcc compiler. I am using the following command: sgicc -Wb,-tt30 -clist -O3 -v test1.c The contents of the test1.t file: !!! DevWarn during Loop Nest Optimizer: Count limit reached on the following DevWarn: !!! DevWarn during Loop Nest Optimizer: TODO: Tune LNO machine model parameters for IA-64 1. How can i tune the LNO parms to make this work under the NUE environment? 2. Is there documentation on the various outputs of the trace options? Thanks. Charles -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles R. Hardnett www.spelman.edu/~hardnett From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Tue Jul 25 14:53:40 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:53:30 -0700 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:10519 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:53:06 -0700 Received: from rohi.engr.sgi.com (rohi.engr.sgi.com [130.62.180.74]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id OAA13772 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:45:12 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (mpm@rohi.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from mpm@localhost) by rohi.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA53712; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:50:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:50:08 -0700 (PDT) From: mpm@rohi.engr.sgi.com (Michael Murphy) Message-Id: <200007252150.OAA53712@rohi.engr.sgi.com> To: pro64-support@oss.sgi.com, hardnett@cc.gatech.edu Subject: Re: Problem Collecting Trace Info Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing From: Charles Hardnett Hi, I have been trying to get the trace information out of the BE of the SGIcc compiler. I am using the following command: sgicc -Wb,-tt30 -clist -O3 -v test1.c The contents of the test1.t file: !!! DevWarn during Loop Nest Optimizer: Count limit reached on the following DevWarn: !!! DevWarn during Loop Nest Optimizer: TODO: Tune LNO machine model parameters for IA-64 1. How can i tune the LNO parms to make this work under the NUE environment? Ignore this devwarn. LNO does work, this was just a note to do more testing of the parameters we use. 2. Is there documentation on the various outputs of the trace options? Unfortunately we don't provide any outside of the source. That's something we should include in the next release (IMO). The format is -Wb,-tt: where phase is a number or name (see common/util/tracing.{h,c}). E.g. -tt30 and -ttvdd are the same. The trace numbers are what is used in the Get_Trace calls, e.g. -ttexp:2 will cause (in the compiler): Get_Trace (TP_CGEXP, 2) to return true. There is also -Wb,-tr which will dump the ir after the phase, and -Wb,-ts to dump the symbol table after the phase (some phases ignore this). -- Mike Murphy -- mpm@sgi.com -- quote of the day: -- "We can have knowledge and not have wisdom. -- But we cannot have wisdom without knowledge." (R.C. Sproul) From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Wed Jul 26 06:46:44 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 06:46:35 -0700 Received: from mail.ee.gatech.edu ([130.207.230.10]:8415 "EHLO mail.ee.gatech.edu") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 06:46:02 -0700 Received: from moa.eecom.gatech.edu (IDENT:root@moa.eecom.gatech.edu [130.207.231.199]) by mail.ee.gatech.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA04940; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 09:45:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from hardnett@localhost) by moa.eecom.gatech.edu (8.9.3/8.8.4) id JAA29106; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 09:45:23 -0400 From: Charles Hardnett MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14718.60242.879331.667325@moa.eecom.gatech.edu> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 09:44:50 -0400 (EDT) To: mpm@rohi.engr.sgi.com (Michael Murphy) Cc: pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Problem Collecting Trace Info In-Reply-To: <200007252150.OAA53712@rohi.engr.sgi.com> References: <200007252150.OAA53712@rohi.engr.sgi.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.71 under 21.1 (patch 4) "Arches" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: hardnett@cc.gatech.edu Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing Thanks for all of the replies. I got help yesterday from Nenad at SGI, and everything seems to be working pretty good. Very nice tracing system. Take Care, Charles Michael Murphy writes: > From: Charles Hardnett > > Hi, > > I have been trying to get the trace information out of the BE of the > SGIcc compiler. I am using the following command: > > sgicc -Wb,-tt30 -clist -O3 -v test1.c > > The contents of the test1.t file: > > !!! DevWarn during Loop Nest Optimizer: Count limit reached on the following DevWarn: > !!! DevWarn during Loop Nest Optimizer: TODO: Tune LNO machine model parameters > for IA-64 > > 1. How can i tune the LNO parms to make this work under the NUE > environment? > > Ignore this devwarn. LNO does work, this was just a note to > do more testing of the parameters we use. > > 2. Is there documentation on the various outputs of the trace options? > > Unfortunately we don't provide any outside of the source. > That's something we should include in the next release (IMO). > The format is -Wb,-tt: > where phase is a number or name (see common/util/tracing.{h,c}). > E.g. -tt30 and -ttvdd are the same. > The trace numbers are what is used in the Get_Trace calls, e.g. > -ttexp:2 will cause (in the compiler): > Get_Trace (TP_CGEXP, 2) > to return true. > There is also -Wb,-tr which will dump the ir after the phase, > and -Wb,-ts to dump the symbol table after the phase (some > phases ignore this). > > -- Mike Murphy > -- mpm@sgi.com > -- quote of the day: > -- "We can have knowledge and not have wisdom. > -- But we cannot have wisdom without knowledge." (R.C. Sproul) > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles R. Hardnett www.spelman.edu/~hardnett From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Wed Jul 26 09:24:35 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 09:24:16 -0700 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:43570 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 09:23:50 -0700 Received: from ledzep.cray.com (ledzep.cray.com [137.38.226.97]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id JAA03122 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 09:15:55 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (larsonre@sgi.com) Received: from daisy-e185.americas.sgi.com (daisy.cray.com [128.162.185.214]) by ledzep.cray.com (SGI-SGI-8.9.3/craymail-smart-nospam1.0) with ESMTP id LAA27359 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 11:20:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from nordic.americas.sgi.com (nordic.americas.sgi.com [128.162.187.147]) by daisy-e185.americas.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/SGI-server-1.6) with ESMTP id LAA68313 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 11:20:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from sgi.com by nordic.americas.sgi.com (8.8.8/SGI-client-1.6c) via ESMTP id LAA30747; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 11:20:54 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <397F0FE5.2F4D74BE@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 11:20:53 -0500 From: Bob Larson Organization: SGI, Silicon Graphics Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5-ALPHA-1275493620 IP22) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Subject: urgent NUE question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing Hi! I have installed NUE and SKI and Pro64 compilers on an IA32 box in Eagan (cloud9.americas.sgi.com) I read the FAQ on http://oss.sgi.com/projects/Pro64/faq.html and I have an urgent question related to the NUE environment that the FAQ does not address. Basically: do I need to worry about corrupting my disk space if I use the same directory for NUE as I do outside NUE? Here is the background of my question: I am using the same NFS directory structure under the IA64 emulator that I use outside the emulator. The directory structure is visible both inside the emulator and outside the emulator. The files are not visible both inside and outside: files created under "nue" are not visible outside the emulator, and the files that exist under the cloud9 login OS are not visible within "nue". My worry is that I might be corrupting the NFS disk. This is a remotely mounted file system with all my "important stuff" on it. It is the location of my "home" directory on a local NFS server: namely tulip.americas.sgi.com. - Bob -- Bob Larson SGI, CAE Applications Group 651-683-3619 655F Lone Oak Dr. Fax : 651-683-5599 Eagan, MN 55121 larsonre@sgi.com http://www.sgi.com From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Thu Jul 27 03:55:48 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 03:55:39 -0700 Received: from narkis.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il ([132.76.80.32]:54788 "EHLO narkis.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 03:55:10 -0700 Received: from wisdom.weizmann.ac.il (amir8-pc.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il [132.76.81.32]) by narkis.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA03021 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 13:53:34 +0300 (IDT) Message-ID: <398014E1.7C8C145F@wisdom.weizmann.ac.il> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 13:54:25 +0300 From: raya Organization: Weizmann Institute of Science X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: il,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pro64 Subject: Not using NUE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing Hello, Is it possible to build a PRO64 compiler which will produce assembly- file (not an executable file), without the NUE environment? Thanks, -- Raya Leviathan Tel. 972-8-9344208 (office) Tel. 972-3-6358481 (home) Email: raya@wisdom.weizmann.ac.il From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Thu Jul 27 09:57:00 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:56:50 -0700 Received: from chamfs.chameleonsystems.com ([208.177.165.131]:39071 "EHLO chamfs.chameleonsystems.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:56:29 -0700 Received: from ocelot.chameleonsystems.com (ocelot.chameleonsystems.com [192.168.1.125]) by chamfs.chameleonsystems.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA24104; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:55:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Xinan Tang To: raya cc: pro64 Subject: Re: Not using NUE In-Reply-To: <398014E1.7C8C145F@wisdom.weizmann.ac.il> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing Hi Yes, of course. Simply add `-S' switch when you compile your code. Good luck Dr. Xinan Tang Member of Technical Staff EMail: tang@chameleonsystems.com Chameleon Systems, Inc. Voice: 408.730.3300 x 117 1195 West Fremont Avenue Fax: 408.730.3303 Sunnyvale, CA 94087 On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, raya wrote: > Hello, > > Is it possible to build a PRO64 compiler which will produce assembly- > file (not an executable file), without the NUE environment? > > Thanks, > -- > Raya Leviathan > Tel. 972-8-9344208 (office) > Tel. 972-3-6358481 (home) > Email: raya@wisdom.weizmann.ac.il > > From owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Mon Jul 31 08:30:16 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 08:30:06 -0700 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com ([204.94.214.22]:10791 "EHLO pneumatic-tube.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 08:29:51 -0700 Received: from cchkms.engr.sgi.com (cchkms.engr.sgi.com [130.62.180.48]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id IAA08051 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 08:35:43 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (rat@cchkms.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from rat@localhost) by cchkms.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id IAA17651; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 08:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 08:28:20 -0700 (PDT) From: rat@cchkms.engr.sgi.com (Ross A. Towle) Message-Id: <200007311528.IAA17651@cchkms.engr.sgi.com> To: pro64 , raya Subject: Re: Not using NUE Sender: owner-pro64-support@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;pro64-support-outgoing The NUE environment also provides the necessary IA64 header files. Also you need cpp for IA64. -Ross