From kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com Wed Dec 1 12:43:30 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Wed, 01 Dec 2004 12:43:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (mverd138.asia.info.net [61.14.31.138]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id iB1KhS1Y000610 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 12:43:29 -0800 Received: from rattle.melbourne.sgi.com (rattle.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.55.145]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id HAA24920; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 07:42:49 +1100 Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 07:42:49 +1100 From: Ken McDonell To: brian.fletcher@baesystems.com cc: ptg@sgi.com, Subject: Re: Via sgi.com: performance copilot In-Reply-To: <200412011828.iB1ISuap031819@web1.sgi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 421 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 brian.fletcher@baesystems.com wrote: > What port does performance copilot use? Several ... pmcd tcp/4321 change with $PMCD_PORT pmlogger tcp/4330 change with $PMLOGGER_PORT tcp/4331 tcp/4332 etc trace pmda tcp/4323 change with $PCP_TRACE_PORT pmjd tcp/4322 this was never released, so should not be seen pmproxy tcp/44322 IANA registered .. pmproxy is not yet released pmdas arbitrary change with -p port in pmcd.conf I have registered IANA alternates for most of these, but don't have the resources to implement the required migration strategy (which is messy, given the client-server nature of the product) From o.tarnus@free.fr Thu Dec 16 02:39:03 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Thu, 16 Dec 2004 02:39:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from lxdomino01.domain ([194.235.198.134]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBGAcgAP032249 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 02:39:02 -0800 Received: from [192.168.8.100] ([192.168.8.100]) by lxdomino01.domain (Lotus Domino Release 6.0.2CF1) with ESMTP id 2004121611381317-327268 ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:38:13 +0100 Message-ID: <41C16595.8000604@free.fr> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:38:13 +0100 From: Olivier Tarnus User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040917) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pcp@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: PCP for x86_64 ? References: <20041127162330.GA28649@ii.uib.no> In-Reply-To: <20041127162330.GA28649@ii.uib.no> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on lxdomino01/KCcom(Release 6.0.2CF1|June 9, 2003) at 16/12/2004 11:38:13, Serialize by Router on lxdomino01/KCcom(Release 6.0.2CF1|June 9, 2003) at 16/12/2004 11:38:40, Serialize complete at 16/12/2004 11:38:40 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/627/Sun Dec 12 11:53:11 2004 clamav-milter version 0.80j on 127.0.0.1 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 422 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: o.tarnus@free.fr Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp Hi, I have some problems to compile on Suse SLES9 on x86_64. Either trying to build via rpmb or by hand will get the same error: checking build system type... Invalid configuration `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu': machine `x86_64-unknown' not recognized configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu failed I've tried: ./configure --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and ./configure --build=x86_64-suse-linux-gnu but both hang at same point I've tried too: ./configure --build=i386-unknown-linux-gnu This will succesfully run configure, but make still hang : Andromeda:~/tmp/pcp-2.4.0 # make rm -f config.cache autoconf ./configure checking build system type... Invalid configuration `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu': machine `x86_64-unknown' not recognized configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu failed make: *** [config.cache] Error 1 Any suggestion? Thanks. Olivier Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: >Has anybody ported PCP to linux/x86_64, or are there no porting >needed? I just did a '/configure --build=i386-unknown-linux-gnu' and >it seemed to build everything just fine, even as 64-bit executables, >but I'm uncertain if this is all it takes ... ? > > > -jf > > > From Jan-Frode.Myklebust@bccs.uib.no Thu Dec 16 03:04:38 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Thu, 16 Dec 2004 03:04:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from eik.ii.uib.no (eik.ii.uib.no [129.177.16.3]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBGB4HUk002688 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 03:04:38 -0800 Received: from loko.ii.uib.no ([129.177.20.21]:47844) by eik.ii.uib.no with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.30) id 1CetQA-00016z-ST; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:03:46 +0100 Received: (from janfrode@localhost) by loko.ii.uib.no (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iBGB2nfU007591; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:02:49 +0100 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:02:49 +0100 From: Jan-Frode Myklebust To: Olivier Tarnus Cc: pcp@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: PCP for x86_64 ? Message-ID: <20041216110249.GB7469@ii.uib.no> Mail-Followup-To: Olivier Tarnus , pcp@oss.sgi.com References: <20041127162330.GA28649@ii.uib.no> <41C16595.8000604@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41C16595.8000604@free.fr> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/627/Sun Dec 12 11:53:11 2004 clamav-milter version 0.80j on 127.0.0.1 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 423 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: Jan-Frode.Myklebust@bccs.uib.no Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 11:38:13AM +0100, Olivier Tarnus wrote: > > Any suggestion? Change the top-level GNUmakefile to also specify the '--build' option to configure: config configure config.cache : configure.in rm -f config.cache autoconf ./configure --build=i386-unknown-linux-gnu -jf From martin.quinson@imag.fr Thu Dec 16 03:33:12 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Thu, 16 Dec 2004 03:33:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from imag.imag.fr (imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBGBWpQC004132 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 03:33:12 -0800 Received: from pamunkey.imag.fr (pamunkey.imag.fr [129.88.69.8]) by imag.imag.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBGBOkJt001831; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:24:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from navajo.imag.fr (mail@navajo.imag.fr [129.88.69.1]) by pamunkey.imag.fr (8.11.6/8.11.3/ImagV2) with ESMTP id iBGBKCL13667; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:20:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.imag.fr ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost ident=quinson) by navajo.imag.fr with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CetoV-0001L8-00; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:28:55 +0100 Received: from mquinson by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CetkT-0000W4-00; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:24:45 +0100 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:24:45 +0100 To: Olivier Tarnus Cc: pcp@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: PCP for x86_64 ? Message-ID: <20041216112445.GD3848@papagos> References: <20041127162330.GA28649@ii.uib.no> <41C16595.8000604@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="osDK9TLjxFScVI/L" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41C16595.8000604@free.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: Martin Quinson X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.4 (imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]); Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:24:46 +0100 (CET) X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/627/Sun Dec 12 11:53:11 2004 clamav-milter version 0.80j on 127.0.0.1 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 424 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: martin.quinson@imag.fr Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp --osDK9TLjxFScVI/L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It looks like an old config.sub. What is its timestamp (3rd line of the script) ? If it's more than 6-10 month old, try to get new versions of config.sub and config.guess (from the automake project). Fyi, in automake-1.9, the timestamp of config.sub is 2004-06-24. The one of config.guess is 2004-08-13. HTH, Mt. On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 11:38:13AM +0100, Olivier Tarnus wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I have some problems to compile on Suse SLES9 on x86_64. > Either trying to build via rpmb or by hand will get the same error: >=20 > checking build system type... Invalid configuration=20 > `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu': machine `x86_64-unknown' not recognized > configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu failed >=20 > I've tried: > ./configure --build=3Dx86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and > ./configure --build=3Dx86_64-suse-linux-gnu >=20 > but both hang at same point >=20 > I've tried too: > ./configure --build=3Di386-unknown-linux-gnu >=20 > This will succesfully run configure, but make still hang : >=20 > Andromeda:~/tmp/pcp-2.4.0 # make > rm -f config.cache > autoconf > ./configure > checking build system type... Invalid configuration=20 > `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu': machine `x86_64-unknown' not recognized > configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu failed > make: *** [config.cache] Error 1 >=20 > Any suggestion? >=20 > Thanks. > Olivier >=20 >=20 >=20 > Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: >=20 > >Has anybody ported PCP to linux/x86_64, or are there no porting > >needed? I just did a '/configure --build=3Di386-unknown-linux-gnu' and > >it seemed to build everything just fine, even as 64-bit executables, > >but I'm uncertain if this is all it takes ... ? > > > > > > -jf > > > >=20 > > >=20 >=20 --osDK9TLjxFScVI/L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBwXB9IiC/MeFF8zQRAhMUAJ0cosWNAvHaauo9ZTNBn4yWlXw6fACfR2ed 0Ht01DI06zxQWYyiTVA68rc= =T4rW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --osDK9TLjxFScVI/L-- From o.tarnus@free.fr Thu Dec 16 05:35:55 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Thu, 16 Dec 2004 05:36:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from lxdomino01.domain ([194.235.198.134]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBGDZYEt011719 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 05:35:55 -0800 Received: from [192.168.8.100] ([192.168.8.100]) by lxdomino01.domain (Lotus Domino Release 6.0.2CF1) with ESMTP id 2004121614351011-327782 ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:35:10 +0100 Message-ID: <41C18F0E.9070406@free.fr> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:35:10 +0100 From: Olivier Tarnus User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040917) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan-Frode Myklebust CC: pcp@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: PCP for x86_64 ? References: <20041127162330.GA28649@ii.uib.no> <41C16595.8000604@free.fr> <20041216110249.GB7469@ii.uib.no> In-Reply-To: <20041216110249.GB7469@ii.uib.no> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on lxdomino01/KCcom(Release 6.0.2CF1|June 9, 2003) at 16/12/2004 14:35:10, Serialize by Router on lxdomino01/KCcom(Release 6.0.2CF1|June 9, 2003) at 16/12/2004 14:35:31, Serialize complete at 16/12/2004 14:35:31 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/627/Sun Dec 12 11:53:11 2004 clamav-milter version 0.80j on 127.0.0.1 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 425 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: o.tarnus@free.fr Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp Thanks, This fixed my problem. Cheers. Olivier Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: >On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 11:38:13AM +0100, Olivier Tarnus wrote: > > >>Any suggestion? >> >> > >Change the top-level GNUmakefile to also specify the '--build' option >to configure: > > config configure config.cache : configure.in > rm -f config.cache > autoconf > ./configure --build=i386-unknown-linux-gnu > > > -jf > > From o.tarnus@free.fr Thu Dec 16 05:37:45 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Thu, 16 Dec 2004 05:37:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from lxdomino01.domain ([194.235.198.134]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBGDbOxL011788 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 05:37:44 -0800 Received: from [192.168.8.100] ([192.168.8.100]) by lxdomino01.domain (Lotus Domino Release 6.0.2CF1) with ESMTP id 2004121614365923-327793 ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:36:59 +0100 Message-ID: <41C18F7C.8020904@free.fr> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:37:00 +0100 From: Olivier Tarnus User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040917) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Quinson CC: pcp@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: PCP for x86_64 ? References: <20041127162330.GA28649@ii.uib.no> <41C16595.8000604@free.fr> <20041216112445.GD3848@papagos> In-Reply-To: <20041216112445.GD3848@papagos> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on lxdomino01/KCcom(Release 6.0.2CF1|June 9, 2003) at 16/12/2004 14:36:59, Serialize by Router on lxdomino01/KCcom(Release 6.0.2CF1|June 9, 2003) at 16/12/2004 14:37:21, Serialize complete at 16/12/2004 14:37:21 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/627/Sun Dec 12 11:53:11 2004 clamav-milter version 0.80j on 127.0.0.1 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 426 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: o.tarnus@free.fr Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp You're right Martin... SLES 9.1 come with automake 1.8.3, and it seems that this is the source of my problems, but SuSE don't provide an update for automake, so i will use the workaround of Jan-Frode for now... Thanks. Olivier Martin Quinson wrote: >It looks like an old config.sub. What is its timestamp (3rd line of the >script) ? If it's more than 6-10 month old, try to get new versions of >config.sub and config.guess (from the automake project). > >Fyi, in automake-1.9, the timestamp of config.sub is 2004-06-24. The one of >config.guess is 2004-08-13. > >HTH, Mt. > >On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 11:38:13AM +0100, Olivier Tarnus wrote: > > >>Hi, >> >>I have some problems to compile on Suse SLES9 on x86_64. >>Either trying to build via rpmb or by hand will get the same error: >> >>checking build system type... Invalid configuration >>`x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu': machine `x86_64-unknown' not recognized >>configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu failed >> >>I've tried: >>./configure --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and >>./configure --build=x86_64-suse-linux-gnu >> >>but both hang at same point >> >>I've tried too: >>./configure --build=i386-unknown-linux-gnu >> >>This will succesfully run configure, but make still hang : >> >>Andromeda:~/tmp/pcp-2.4.0 # make >>rm -f config.cache >>autoconf >>./configure >>checking build system type... Invalid configuration >>`x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu': machine `x86_64-unknown' not recognized >>configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu failed >>make: *** [config.cache] Error 1 >> >>Any suggestion? >> >>Thanks. >>Olivier >> >> >> >>Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: >> >> >> >>>Has anybody ported PCP to linux/x86_64, or are there no porting >>>needed? I just did a '/configure --build=i386-unknown-linux-gnu' and >>>it seemed to build everything just fine, even as 64-bit executables, >>>but I'm uncertain if this is all it takes ... ? >>> >>> >>>-jf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> From kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com Tue Dec 21 12:44:52 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Tue, 21 Dec 2004 12:44:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (mverd138.asia.info.net [61.14.31.138]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id iBLKiUwW010593 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 12:44:51 -0800 Received: from ppp-kenmcd.melbourne.sgi.com (ppp-kenmcd.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.219]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id HAA23284; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 07:43:54 +1100 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 07:40:05 +1100 (EST) From: kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com Reply-To: Ken McDonell To: Olivier Tarnus cc: Jan-Frode Myklebust , pcp@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: PCP for x86_64 ? In-Reply-To: <41C18F0E.9070406@free.fr> Message-ID: References: <20041127162330.GA28649@ii.uib.no> <41C16595.8000604@free.fr> <20041216110249.GB7469@ii.uib.no> <41C18F0E.9070406@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/627/Sun Dec 12 11:53:11 2004 clamav-milter version 0.80j on 127.0.0.1 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 427 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp Thanks, Jan-Frode. It should come as no surprise that sgi engineers don't have access to x86_64 for pcp testing, so assistance from others is most appreciated. On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Olivier Tarnus wrote: > Thanks, > > This fixed my problem. > > Cheers. > Olivier > > Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 11:38:13AM +0100, Olivier Tarnus wrote: >> >>> Any suggestion? >>> >> >> Change the top-level GNUmakefile to also specify the '--build' option >> to configure: >> >> config configure config.cache : configure.in >> rm -f config.cache >> autoconf >> ./configure --build=i386-unknown-linux-gnu >> >> >> -jf >> > > From o.tarnus@free.fr Wed Dec 22 09:05:55 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Wed, 22 Dec 2004 09:06:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from lxdomino01.domain ([194.235.198.134]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBMH5UeN025139 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 09:05:55 -0800 Received: from [192.168.8.100] ([192.168.8.100]) by lxdomino01.domain (Lotus Domino Release 6.0.2CF1) with ESMTP id 2004122218061586-345038 ; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 18:06:15 +0100 Message-ID: <41C9A987.7060003@free.fr> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 18:06:15 +0100 From: Olivier Tarnus User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040917) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ken McDonell CC: Jan-Frode Myklebust , pcp@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: PCP for x86_64 ? References: <20041127162330.GA28649@ii.uib.no> <41C16595.8000604@free.fr> <20041216110249.GB7469@ii.uib.no> <41C18F0E.9070406@free.fr> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on lxdomino01/KCcom(Release 6.0.2CF1|June 9, 2003) at 22/12/2004 18:06:15, Serialize by Router on lxdomino01/KCcom(Release 6.0.2CF1|June 9, 2003) at 22/12/2004 18:06:42, Serialize complete at 22/12/2004 18:06:42 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/627/Sun Dec 12 11:53:11 2004 clamav-milter version 0.80j on 127.0.0.1 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 428 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: o.tarnus@free.fr Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com wrote: > Thanks, Jan-Frode. > > It should come as no surprise that sgi engineers don't have access to > x86_64 for pcp testing, so assistance from others is most appreciated. > Tell me what could help you... My only limitation is that i actually MUST use SuSE SLES9, and so can't upgrade automake/autoconf. But if i can do anything for pcp, it will be a pleasure :-) Olivier > On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Olivier Tarnus wrote: > >> Thanks, >> >> This fixed my problem. >> >> Cheers. >> Olivier >> >> Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 11:38:13AM +0100, Olivier Tarnus wrote: >>> >>>> Any suggestion? >>>> >>> >>> Change the top-level GNUmakefile to also specify the '--build' option >>> to configure: >>> >>> config configure config.cache : configure.in >>> rm -f config.cache >>> autoconf >>> ./configure --build=i386-unknown-linux-gnu >>> >>> >>> -jf >>> >> >>