From ahoyt@moser-inc.com Tue Jun 3 12:58:58 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Tue, 03 Jun 2003 12:59:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcimail.moser-inc.com ([207.250.3.118]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h53Jwb2x022426 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 12:58:58 -0700 Received: from moser-inc.com (r9100-vpn.moser-inc.com [207.250.3.126] (may be forged)) by mcimail.moser-inc.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h53JusMZ024189 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 14:56:55 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3EDCFDEC.2080709@moser-inc.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 14:58:36 -0500 From: Alan Hoyt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PCP Subject: [QA 1.1 PATCH] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------060406010308040203010205" X-archive-position: 263 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: ahoyt@moser-inc.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060406010308040203010205 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit for solaris ./src-oss compilation - Alan - --------------060406010308040203010205 Content-Type: text/plain; name="torture_trace.c.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="torture_trace.c.patch" --- torture_trace.c.orig 2003-06-03 19:43:36.270001000 +0000 +++ torture_trace.c 2003-06-03 19:07:39.420002000 +0000 @@ -7,10 +7,17 @@ #include #include +#include + +#ifdef IS_SOLARIS +#include +#include +#include +#else #include +#endif #include -#include #ifndef HAVE_SPROC --------------060406010308040203010205-- From ahoyt@moser-inc.com Tue Jun 3 12:59:09 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Tue, 03 Jun 2003 12:59:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcimail.moser-inc.com ([207.250.3.118]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h53Jwm2x022487 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 12:59:08 -0700 Received: from moser-inc.com (r9100-vpn.moser-inc.com [207.250.3.126] (may be forged)) by mcimail.moser-inc.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h53Jv6MZ024202 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 14:57:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3EDCFDF8.30704@moser-inc.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 14:58:48 -0500 From: Alan Hoyt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PCP Subject: [QA 1.1 PATCH] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------030903070909090200040002" X-archive-position: 265 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: ahoyt@moser-inc.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030903070909090200040002 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit for solairs platform id - Alan - --------------030903070909090200040002 Content-Type: text/plain; name="common.rc.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="common.rc.patch" --- common.rc.orig 2003-02-13 10:51:36.000000000 +0000 +++ common.rc 2003-06-03 19:04:30.480002000 +0000 @@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ then PCP_PMCD_PROG=$PCP_BINADM_DIR/pmcd PCP_PMCDLOG_PATH=$PCP_LOG_DIR/pmcd/pmcd.log +elif [ "$PCP_PLATFORM" = solaris ] +then + PCP_PMCD_PROG=$PCP_BINADM_DIR/pmcd + PCP_PMCDLOG_PATH=$PCP_LOG_DIR/pmcd/pmcd.log elif [ "$PCP_PLATFORM" = irix ] then PCP_PMCD_PROG=/usr/etc/pmcd --------------030903070909090200040002-- From ahoyt@moser-inc.com Tue Jun 3 12:59:06 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Tue, 03 Jun 2003 12:59:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcimail.moser-inc.com ([207.250.3.118]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h53Jwj2x022484 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 12:59:05 -0700 Received: from moser-inc.com (r9100-vpn.moser-inc.com [207.250.3.126] (may be forged)) by mcimail.moser-inc.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h53Jv3MZ024197 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 14:57:03 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3EDCFDF4.2060802@moser-inc.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 14:58:44 -0500 From: Alan Hoyt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PCP Subject: [QA 1.1 PATCH] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020306030704050500070609" X-archive-position: 264 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: ahoyt@moser-inc.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020306030704050500070609 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit for solaris platform id - Alan - --------------020306030704050500070609 Content-Type: text/plain; name="mk.localconfig.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="mk.localconfig.patch" --- mk.localconfig.orig 2003-02-13 10:51:38.000000000 +0000 +++ mk.localconfig 2003-06-03 16:41:34.420003000 +0000 @@ -115,6 +115,16 @@ [ -z "$PCP_VER" ] && PCP_VER=0 PCP_EOE_VER=$PCP_VER PCP_EOE_NOSHIP_VER=0 +elif [ "$PCP_PLATFORM" = solaris ] +then + PCP_VER=`echo $PCP_VERSION \ + | sed \ + -e '/^[^.]*\.[^.]*$/s/$/.0/' \ + -e 's/\.\([0-9]\)$/.0\1/' \ + -e 's/\.//g'` + [ -z "$PCP_VER" ] && PCP_VER=0 + PCP_EOE_VER=$PCP_VER + PCP_EOE_NOSHIP_VER=0 else echo "$0: Error: I don't understand your \$PCP_PLATFORM=\"$PCP_PLATFORM\"" --------------020306030704050500070609-- From ahoyt@moser-inc.com Tue Jun 3 14:35:37 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Tue, 03 Jun 2003 14:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcimail.moser-inc.com ([207.250.3.118]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h53LZG2x026874 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 14:35:37 -0700 Received: from moser-inc.com (r9100-vpn.moser-inc.com [207.250.3.126] (may be forged)) by mcimail.moser-inc.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h53LXYMZ025837 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:33:34 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3EDD1494.4000203@moser-inc.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 16:35:16 -0500 From: Alan Hoyt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PCP Subject: [QA 1.1 PATCH] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050205080909040107070504" X-archive-position: 266 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: ahoyt@moser-inc.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050205080909040107070504 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit more solaris related qa changes - Alan - --------------050205080909040107070504 Content-Type: text/plain; name="common.check.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="common.check.patch" --- common.check.orig 2003-02-13 10:51:36.000000000 +0000 +++ common.check 2003-06-03 21:32:58.320009000 +0000 @@ -780,7 +780,40 @@ echo "_change_config: Error: cannot change config \"$1 $2\"" exit 1 fi - else + elif [ $PCP_PLATFORM = solaris ] + then + # if which chkconfig >/dev/null 2>&1 + # then + # Try the Solaris way .. + # + case $1 + in + pmlogger) pat=pcp + ;; + pmcd) pat=pcp + ;; + pmie) pat=pmie + ;; + verbose) pat="" + ;; + *) pat=$1 + ;; + esac + if [ $2 = on ] + then + . $PCP_SHARE_DIR/lib/rc-proc.sh -x + [ ! -z "$pat" ] && $sudo chkconfig_on $pat + elif [ $2 != on ] + then + [ ! -z "$pat" ] && $sudo chkconfig_off $pat + else + # I have no clue! + # + echo "_change_config: Error: cannot change config \"$1 $2\"" + exit 1 + fi + + else # Try the IRIX way # if which chkconfig >/dev/null 2>&1 @@ -834,7 +867,42 @@ # echo unknown fi - else + elif [ $PCP_PLATFORM = solaris ] + then + if which chkconfig >/dev/null 2>&1 + then + case $1 + in + pmlogger|pmcd) + # both these IRIX chkconfig options map to + # pcp for RedHat Linux + pat=pcp + ;; + verbose) + pat="" + ;; + *) pat=$1 + ;; + esac + if [ -z "$pat" ] + then + # unconditionally "on", or no such option + # + echo on + else + if chkconfig $pat + then + echo on + else + echo off + fi + fi + else + # I have no clue! + # + echo unknown + fi + else # Try the IRIX way # if which chkconfig >/dev/null 2>&1 --------------050205080909040107070504-- From ahoyt@moser-inc.com Tue Jun 3 14:40:03 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Tue, 03 Jun 2003 14:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcimail.moser-inc.com ([207.250.3.118]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h53Ldh2x026894 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 14:40:03 -0700 Received: from moser-inc.com (r9100-vpn.moser-inc.com [207.250.3.126] (may be forged)) by mcimail.moser-inc.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h53Lc1MZ025885 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:38:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3EDD159E.7080200@moser-inc.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 16:39:42 -0500 From: Alan Hoyt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PCP Subject: [QA 1.1 PATCH] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020808000500090400030205" X-archive-position: 267 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: ahoyt@moser-inc.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020808000500090400030205 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit another solaris change - Alan - --------------020808000500090400030205 Content-Type: text/plain; name="common.config.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="common.config.patch" --- common.config.orig 2003-02-13 10:51:36.000000000 +0000 +++ common.config 2003-06-03 21:33:34.390002000 +0000 @@ -71,6 +71,13 @@ then PCPQA_CLOSE_X_SERVER=:0 fi +elif [ $PCP_PLATFORM = solaris ] +then + if ps -ef | grep '[X]11/X ' >/dev/null 2>&1 + then + PCPQA_CLOSE_X_SERVER=:0 + fi + elif [ $PCP_PLATFORM = irix ] then if ps -ef | grep '[X]11/Xsgi ' >/dev/null 2>&1 --------------020808000500090400030205-- From ahoyt@moser-inc.com Tue Jun 3 14:49:44 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Tue, 03 Jun 2003 14:49:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcimail.moser-inc.com ([207.250.3.118]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h53LnN2x027149 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 14:49:44 -0700 Received: from moser-inc.com (r9100-vpn.moser-inc.com [207.250.3.126] (may be forged)) by mcimail.moser-inc.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h53LlfMZ026005 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:47:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3EDD17BF.6030007@moser-inc.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 16:48:47 -0500 From: Alan Hoyt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PCP Subject: sunnyboy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 268 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: ahoyt@moser-inc.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp Does sunnyboy participate in pcp qa testing or is it a disparate box? - Alan - From kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com Tue Jun 3 15:46:18 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Tue, 03 Jun 2003 15:46:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tolkor.sgi.com (tolkor.SGI.COM [198.149.18.6]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h53Mjv2x028910 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:46:18 -0700 Received: from rattle.melbourne.sgi.com (rattle.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.55.145]) by tolkor.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.2/linux-outbound_gateway-1.2) with ESMTP id h53N1kVe016325 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 18:01:47 -0500 Received: from rattle.melbourne.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rattle.melbourne.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h53MiYO3239871; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 08:44:34 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost (kenmcd@localhost) by rattle.melbourne.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id h53MiY7a238425; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 08:44:34 +1000 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: rattle.melbourne.sgi.com: kenmcd owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 08:44:34 +1000 From: Ken McDonell To: Alan Hoyt cc: PCP Subject: Re: sunnyboy In-Reply-To: <3EDD17BF.6030007@moser-inc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 269 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Alan Hoyt wrote: > Does sunnyboy participate in pcp qa testing or is it a disparate box? It is sometimes available for QA in Melbourne, but not on a regualr basis. Why do you ask? From ahoyt@moser-inc.com Tue Jun 3 16:37:30 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Tue, 03 Jun 2003 16:37:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcimail.moser-inc.com ([207.250.3.118]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h53Nb92x029350 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:37:30 -0700 Received: from moser-inc.com (r9100-vpn.moser-inc.com [207.250.3.126] (may be forged)) by mcimail.moser-inc.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h53NZQMZ027010; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 18:35:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3EDD30FD.5030009@moser-inc.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 18:36:29 -0500 From: Alan Hoyt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ken McDonell CC: PCP Subject: Re: sunnyboy References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 270 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: ahoyt@moser-inc.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp I would like to make sure the pcp solaris port plays well with other pcp platforms/versions. - Alan - Ken McDonell wrote: >On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Alan Hoyt wrote: > > > >>Does sunnyboy participate in pcp qa testing or is it a disparate box? >> >> > >It is sometimes available for QA in Melbourne, but not on a regualr >basis. > >Why do you ask? > > > > > From gerth@stanford.edu Thu Jun 12 23:22:46 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:22:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp9.Stanford.EDU (smtp9.Stanford.EDU [171.67.16.36]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5D6Mj2x025163 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:22:46 -0700 Received: (from root@localhost) by smtp9.Stanford.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) id h5D6MirC015912 for pcp@oss.sgi.com; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:22:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bissell.Stanford.EDU (gpo.Stanford.EDU [171.64.77.203]) by smtp9.Stanford.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5D6MgZr015907 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:22:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scarecrow.coastside.net ([63.194.153.107] helo=stanford.edu) by bissell.Stanford.EDU with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.14) id 19QhxS-0006CE-28; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:22:42 -0700 Message-ID: <3EE96D63.4010506@stanford.edu> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:21:23 -0700 From: John Gerth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nathans@sgi.com CC: pcp@oss.sgi.com Subject: PCP on RedHat 9 (problems with errno due to threads) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sender: gerth@stanford.edu (via 63.194.153.107) X-Authenticated-id: Yes, gerth X-archive-position: 271 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: gerth@stanford.edu Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp > On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:07:05 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:02:40AM -0500, Troy Dawson wrote: >> Howdy, >> I'm having a hard time recompiling pcp 2.3 on RedHat 9. It's because of >> that blasted 'errno' problem that alot of other programs are having on >> RedHat 9. (Boy when they said they broke binary compatability, they weren't >> kidding.) >> Am I the only person who's seen this, or am I just the first to report it. >> >> I've tried just putting the #include in various files, but I >> never seemed to find them all, and then eventually I broke something. >> >> Has anyone been able to get this working yet, or should I keep on plugging >> away? > > I have this working, and will checkin the changes shortly (and > Mark is back in the office now, so I imagine new source should > also appear on oss.sgi.com soon). I also have a bison version > fix up my sleeve for pmie (for current Debian bison), and some > updates to the XFS metrics in the pipeline as well. > Did those changes ever get checked in and become visible? I don't see anything newer than the last release at the website I'd be willing to build the RPM and contribute it back. We are about to migrate all our Linux boxes from 7.3 to 9 this summer and I don't want to lose PCP. -- John Gerth gerth@stanford.edu (650) 725-3273 fax 723-0033 From nathans@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com Thu Jun 12 23:40:23 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:40:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zok.sgi.com (zok.sgi.com [204.94.215.101]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5D6eN2x026283 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:40:23 -0700 Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by zok.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.2/linux-outbound_gateway-1.2) with SMTP id h5D6eH3X023864 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:40:17 -0700 Received: from wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.55.135]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA18556; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:39:01 +1000 Received: from frodo.melbourne.sgi.com (root@frodo.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.55.153]) by wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h5D6d0tt133944; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:39:00 +1000 (EST) Received: from frodo.melbourne.sgi.com (nathans@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frodo.melbourne.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-3) with ESMTP id h5D6ckqn001398; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:38:46 +1000 Received: (from nathans@localhost) by frodo.melbourne.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-3) id h5D6cjiZ001396; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:38:45 +1000 Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:38:45 +1000 From: Nathan Scott To: John Gerth Cc: pcp@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: PCP on RedHat 9 (problems with errno due to threads) Message-ID: <20030613063845.GB1321@frodo> References: <3EE96D63.4010506@stanford.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EE96D63.4010506@stanford.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-archive-position: 272 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: nathans@sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 11:21:23PM -0700, John Gerth wrote: > ... > Did those changes ever get checked in and become visible? > I don't see anything newer than the last release at the website Yes, couple of weeks ago now. Just needs a new release - Mark? > I'd be willing to build the RPM and contribute it back. > > We are about to migrate all our Linux boxes from 7.3 to 9 this > summer and I don't want to lose PCP. cheers. -- Nathan From markgw@sgi.com Thu Jun 12 23:52:19 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:52:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zok.sgi.com (zok.sgi.com [204.94.215.101]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5D6qI2x026598 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:52:18 -0700 Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by zok.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.2/linux-outbound_gateway-1.2) with SMTP id h5D6qA3X024818 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:52:12 -0700 Received: from sherman.melbourne.sgi.com (sherman.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.54.232]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA18648; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:50:48 +1000 Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:50:48 +1000 (EST) From: Mark Goodwin X-X-Sender: markgw@sherman.melbourne.sgi.com To: John Gerth cc: nathans@sgi.com, Subject: Re: PCP on RedHat 9 (problems with errno due to threads) In-Reply-To: <3EE96D63.4010506@stanford.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 273 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: markgw@sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, John Gerth wrote: > > > Did those changes ever get checked in and become visible? > I don't see anything newer than the last release at the website Yeah it's all in and I'm not far off pushing pcp-2.3.0-17 up to oss. Can I send you the latest srpm for some extra testing? Thanks -- Mark From markgw@sgi.com Fri Jun 13 00:50:07 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 00:50:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zok.sgi.com (zok.sgi.com [204.94.215.101]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5D7o62x028668 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 00:50:07 -0700 Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by zok.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.2/linux-outbound_gateway-1.2) with SMTP id h5D7nv3X030540 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 00:49:59 -0700 Received: from sherman.melbourne.sgi.com (sherman.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.54.232]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id RAA19403; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:48:41 +1000 Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:48:41 +1000 (EST) From: Mark Goodwin X-X-Sender: markgw@sherman.melbourne.sgi.com To: pcp@oss.sgi.com cc: John Gerth Subject: Re: PCP on RedHat 9 (problems with errno due to threads) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 274 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: markgw@sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp OK pcp-2.3.20-17 is up on oss in the download/dev directory ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/dev/ Please test and provide feedback. The ia32 binary RPMs were built on an old RH7.1/glibc2.2.4/gcc2.96 system for (hopefully) the best compatibility. For RH9, you may want to rebuild the SRPM. There is also an ia64 binary RPM. [markgw@oss dev]$ ls -l total 5336 -rw-rw-r-- 1 markgw markgw 167 Jun 13 00:45 MD5SUM drwxrwxr-x 2 markgw pcp 129 Apr 1 21:23 old -rw-rw-r-- 1 markgw pcp 1567565 Jun 13 00:31 pcp-2.3.0-17.i386.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 markgw pcp 2770338 Jun 13 00:45 pcp-2.3.0-17.ia64.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 markgw pcp 1116470 Jun 13 00:31 pcp-2.3.0-17.src.rpm Thanks -- Mark http://www.sgi-extremelinux.com The source of innovation and discoveryTM From gerth@stanford.edu Fri Jun 13 13:17:24 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 13:17:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp8.Stanford.EDU (smtp8.Stanford.EDU [171.67.16.35]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5DKHK2x012265 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 13:17:23 -0700 Received: (from root@localhost) by smtp8.Stanford.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) id h5DKHBi2011121 for pcp@oss.sgi.com; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 13:17:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bissell.Stanford.EDU (gpo.Stanford.EDU [171.64.77.203]) by smtp8.Stanford.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5DKH1x2011005 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 13:17:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jaggy.stanford.edu ([171.64.77.132] helo=stanford.edu) by bissell.Stanford.EDU with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.14) id 19Quyq-0001Qi-Ov; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 13:17:00 -0700 Message-ID: <3EEA313B.10301@stanford.edu> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 13:16:59 -0700 From: John Gerth Organization: Stanford University User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Goodwin CC: pcp@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: PCP on RedHat 9 --- tests with pcp-2.3.20-17 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sender: gerth@stanford.edu (via 171.64.77.132) X-Authenticated-id: Yes, gerth X-archive-position: 275 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: gerth@stanford.edu Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp Mark Goodwin wrote: > OK pcp-2.3.20-17 is up on oss in the download/dev directory > ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/dev/ > > Please test and provide feedback. > > The ia32 binary RPMs were built on an old RH7.1/glibc2.2.4/gcc2.96 > system for (hopefully) the best compatibility. For RH9, you may want to > rebuild the SRPM. There is also an ia64 binary RPM. > Happy to report that pcp-2.3.20-17 worked just fine. I also upgraded a 7.1, 7.3, and 8.0 system as well as Redhat 9 without incident. Finally I did an 'rpmbuild -ba' on Redhat 9 with the src rpm and installed the resultant binary. Thanks for the fast response. -- John Gerth gerth@stanford.edu (650) 725-3273 fax 723-0033 From gerth@stanford.edu Fri Jun 13 16:23:29 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:23:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp4.Stanford.EDU (smtp4.Stanford.EDU [171.67.16.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5DNNS2x021395 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:23:29 -0700 Received: (from root@localhost) by smtp4.Stanford.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) id h5DNNSa6023207 for pcp@oss.sgi.com; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:23:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bissell.Stanford.EDU (gpo.Stanford.EDU [171.64.77.203]) by smtp4.Stanford.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5DNNOMs023182 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:23:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jaggy.stanford.edu ([171.64.77.132] helo=stanford.edu) by bissell.Stanford.EDU with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.14) id 19QxtE-0002h4-Fg; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:23:24 -0700 Message-ID: <3EEA5CEB.7010506@stanford.edu> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:23:23 -0700 From: John Gerth Organization: Stanford University User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Goodwin CC: pcp@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: PCP on RedHat 9 --- tests with pcp-2.3.0-17 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sender: gerth@stanford.edu (via 171.64.77.132) X-Authenticated-id: Yes, gerth X-archive-position: 276 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: gerth@stanford.edu Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp Mark Goodwin wrote: > > sounds good, thanks for the feedback. Note that the ia32 binary RPM on > oss.sgi.com should also work on Redhat 9 systems (no need to rebuild). > I was just being cautious. > Yes, I installed the ia32 binary RPM and it also worked fine -- John Gerth gerth@stanford.edu (650) 725-3273 fax 723-0033 From markgw@sgi.com Fri Jun 13 17:43:02 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:43:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rj.sgi.com (rj.sgi.com [192.82.208.96]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5E0h12x026168 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:43:02 -0700 Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by rj.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.2/linux-outbound_gateway-1.2) with SMTP id h5DN7bE0008518 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:07:38 -0700 Received: from sherman.melbourne.sgi.com (sherman.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.54.232]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id JAA26743; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 09:06:19 +1000 Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 09:06:19 +1000 (EST) From: Mark Goodwin X-X-Sender: markgw@sherman.melbourne.sgi.com To: John Gerth cc: pcp@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: PCP on RedHat 9 --- tests with pcp-2.3.20-17 In-Reply-To: <3EEA313B.10301@stanford.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 277 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: markgw@sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, John Gerth wrote: > Mark Goodwin wrote: > > > OK pcp-2.3.20-17 is up on oss in the download/dev directory > > ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/dev/ sorry, a typo. It's pcp-2.3.0-17 (not pcp-2.3.20-17). > > Please test and provide feedback. > > > > The ia32 binary RPMs were built on an old RH7.1/glibc2.2.4/gcc2.96 > > system for (hopefully) the best compatibility. For RH9, you may want to > > rebuild the SRPM. There is also an ia64 binary RPM. > > Happy to report that pcp-2.3.20-17 worked just fine. I also upgraded > a 7.1, 7.3, and 8.0 system as well as Redhat 9 without incident. > > Finally I did an 'rpmbuild -ba' on Redhat 9 with the src rpm and > installed the resultant binary. sounds good, thanks for the feedback. Note that the ia32 binary RPM on oss.sgi.com should also work on Redhat 9 systems (no need to rebuild). I was just being cautious. Thanks -- Mark From chris.howland@moser-inc.com Mon Jun 16 08:28:00 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:28:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcimail.moser-inc.com ([207.250.3.118]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5GFRw2x012003 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:27:59 -0700 Received: from INLAPCHOWLAND (r9100-vpn.moser-inc.com [207.250.3.126] (may be forged)) by mcimail.moser-inc.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5GFQ0MZ013372 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:26:00 -0500 (EST) From: "Chris Howland" To: Subject: pcp sybase agent Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:31:17 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4925.2800 Importance: Normal X-archive-position: 278 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: chris.howland@moser-inc.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp I am in the process of attempting a Sybase agent for pcp. I think it has the potential to be a great tool. I could use any comments,questions, suggestions, from anyone who may have tried this, or something similar. Are there any resources available from the previously commercial version of this? code snippets, documentation, list of metrics, etc? Is the proprietary version of the Sybase agent going to be turned over to the open source community any time soon? Thanks. Chris Chris Howland chris.howland@moser-inc.com From dawson@fnal.gov Mon Jun 16 09:10:38 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:10:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heffalump.fnal.gov (heffalump.fnal.gov [131.225.9.20]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5GGAc2x015054 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:10:38 -0700 Received: from fnal.gov (thebrain.fnal.gov [131.225.80.75]) by heffalump.fnal.gov (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.10 (built Jan 23 2003)) with ESMTPSA id <0HGL00K8P0XP5O@heffalump.fnal.gov> for pcp@oss.sgi.com; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 11:10:37 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 11:10:37 -0500 From: Troy Dawson Subject: Re: PCP on RedHat 9 (problems with errno due to threads) In-reply-to: To: Mark Goodwin Cc: pcp@oss.sgi.com, John Gerth Message-id: <3EEDEBFD.9040400@fnal.gov> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225 References: X-archive-position: 279 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: dawson@fnal.gov Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp I have so far only tested it on RedHat 9 machines, but it so far has worked great on the various different hardware platforms. (These are all dual Intel's, or AMD machines with various speeds and hardware) Thank you very much. Troy Mark Goodwin wrote: > OK pcp-2.3.20-17 is up on oss in the download/dev directory > ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/dev/ > > Please test and provide feedback. > > The ia32 binary RPMs were built on an old RH7.1/glibc2.2.4/gcc2.96 > system for (hopefully) the best compatibility. For RH9, you may want to > rebuild the SRPM. There is also an ia64 binary RPM. > > [markgw@oss dev]$ ls -l > total 5336 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 markgw markgw 167 Jun 13 00:45 MD5SUM > drwxrwxr-x 2 markgw pcp 129 Apr 1 21:23 old > -rw-rw-r-- 1 markgw pcp 1567565 Jun 13 00:31 pcp-2.3.0-17.i386.rpm > -rw-rw-r-- 1 markgw pcp 2770338 Jun 13 00:45 pcp-2.3.0-17.ia64.rpm > -rw-rw-r-- 1 markgw pcp 1116470 Jun 13 00:31 pcp-2.3.0-17.src.rpm > > Thanks > -- Mark > > http://www.sgi-extremelinux.com > The source of innovation and discoveryTM > > -- __________________________________________________ Troy Dawson dawson@fnal.gov (630)840-6468 Fermilab ComputingDivision/OSS CSI Group __________________________________________________ From ahoyt@moser-inc.com Mon Jun 16 12:09:27 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:09:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcimail.moser-inc.com ([207.250.3.118]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5GJ9Q2x007535 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:09:27 -0700 Received: from moser-inc.com (r9100-vpn.moser-inc.com [207.250.3.126] (may be forged)) by mcimail.moser-inc.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5GJ7RMZ016579 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:07:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3EEE15B5.1040308@moser-inc.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:08:37 -0500 From: Alan Hoyt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PCP Subject: configure.in Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 280 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: ahoyt@moser-inc.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp In configure.in, what's with $ac_n and $ac_c - these values are null and clear the echo flag settings made in the prior statement: if ( $echo "testing\c"; $echo 1,2,3 ) | grep c >/dev/null then if ( $echo -n testing; $echo 1,2,3 ) | sed s/-n/xn/ | grep xn >/dev/null then echo_n= echo_c= else echo_n=-n echo_c= fi else echo_n= echo_c='\c' fi dnl echo_n set to -n if echo understands -n to supress newline echo_n=$ac_n AC_SUBST(echo_n) dnl echo_c set to \c if echo understands \c to supress newline echo_c=$ac_c AC_SUBST(echo_c) Easy fix unless you need them for something. - Alan - From ahoyt@moser-inc.com Tue Jun 17 08:08:07 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:08:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcimail.moser-inc.com ([207.250.3.118]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5HF862x028787 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:08:06 -0700 Received: from moser-inc.com (r9100-vpn.moser-inc.com [207.250.3.126] (may be forged)) by mcimail.moser-inc.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5HF66MZ028609 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:06:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3EEF2E9F.8040606@moser-inc.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:07:11 -0500 From: Alan Hoyt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PCP Subject: Re: configure.in References: <3EEE15B5.1040308@moser-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <3EEE15B5.1040308@moser-inc.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000500050202080107050106" X-archive-position: 281 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: ahoyt@moser-inc.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000500050202080107050106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit this works for me unless you wanted something like: if (echo -n testing; echo 1,2,3) | sed s/-n/xn/ | grep xn >/dev/null; then ac_n= ac_c=' ' ac_t=' ' else ac_n=-n ac_c= ac_t= fi else ac_n= ac_c='\c' ac_t= fi - Alan - Alan Hoyt wrote: > In configure.in, what's with $ac_n and $ac_c - these values are null > and clear the echo flag settings made in the prior statement: > > if ( $echo "testing\c"; $echo 1,2,3 ) | grep c >/dev/null > then > if ( $echo -n testing; $echo 1,2,3 ) | sed s/-n/xn/ | grep xn >/dev/null > then > echo_n= echo_c= > else > echo_n=-n echo_c= > fi > else > echo_n= echo_c='\c' > fi > > dnl echo_n set to -n if echo understands -n to supress newline > echo_n=$ac_n > AC_SUBST(echo_n) > dnl echo_c set to \c if echo understands \c to supress newline > echo_c=$ac_c > AC_SUBST(echo_c) > > Easy fix unless you need them for something. > > - Alan - > > > > > --------------000500050202080107050106 Content-Type: text/plain; name="configure.in.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="configure.in.patch" --- configure.in.orig 2003-06-16 14:52:49.540007000 +0000 +++ configure.in 2003-06-16 22:42:12.070002000 +0000 @@ -320,12 +320,7 @@ else echo_n= echo_c='\c' fi - -dnl echo_n set to -n if echo understands -n to supress newline -echo_n=$ac_n AC_SUBST(echo_n) -dnl echo_c set to \c if echo understands \c to supress newline -echo_c=$ac_c AC_SUBST(echo_c) dnl if /proc is not mounted, try and mount it --------------000500050202080107050106-- From ahoyt@moser-inc.com Tue Jun 17 08:47:30 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcimail.moser-inc.com ([207.250.3.118]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5HFlT2x029262 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:47:30 -0700 Received: from moser-inc.com (r9100-vpn.moser-inc.com [207.250.3.126] (may be forged)) by mcimail.moser-inc.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5HFjUMZ029269 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:45:30 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3EEF3819.1040407@moser-inc.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:47:37 -0500 From: Alan Hoyt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PCP Subject: [QA 1.1 PATCH] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000506010009090402040406" X-archive-position: 282 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: ahoyt@moser-inc.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000506010009090402040406 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --------------000506010009090402040406 Content-Type: text/plain; name="check.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="check.patch" --- check 2003-06-17 15:39:36.510003000 +0000 +++ check.new 2003-06-17 15:42:24.440002000 +0000 @@ -265,6 +265,20 @@ rpm -qlc $_checkpkgs >$tmp.checkfiles 2>/dev/null _addfiles $tmp.checkfiles $_checkfiles fi + elif [ $PCP_PLATFORM = solaris ] + then + _checkfiles="$PCP_PMCDCONF_PATH \ + $PCP_VAR_DIR/config/pmlogger/control \ + $PCP_VAR_DIR/config/pmlogger/config.default \ + $PCP_VAR_DIR/config/pmie/control \ + /etc/init.d/pcp \ + $PCP_VAR_DIR/config/pmcd/pmcd.options \ + /etc/pcp.conf /etc/pcp.env \ + $PCP_PMDAS_DIR/sample/dsohelp.dir \ + $PCP_PMDAS_DIR/sample/dsohelp.pag \ + $PCP_PMDAS_DIR/sample/help.dir \ + $PCP_PMDAS_DIR/sample/help.pag \ + $PCP_PMDAS_DIR/simple/simple.conf" else bozo fi --------------000506010009090402040406-- From kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com Tue Jun 17 23:26:10 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Tue, 17 Jun 2003 23:26:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rj.sgi.com (rj.SGI.COM [192.82.208.96]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5I6QA2x020520 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 23:26:10 -0700 Received: from rattle.melbourne.sgi.com (rattle.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.55.145]) by rj.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.2/linux-outbound_gateway-1.2) with ESMTP id h5HM14E0011876 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:01:04 -0700 Received: from rattle.melbourne.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rattle.melbourne.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h5HLxmO3372194; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 07:59:48 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost (kenmcd@localhost) by rattle.melbourne.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id h5HLxkAH372413; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 07:59:47 +1000 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: rattle.melbourne.sgi.com: kenmcd owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 07:59:46 +1000 From: Ken McDonell To: Alan Hoyt cc: PCP Subject: Re: [QA 1.1 PATCH] In-Reply-To: <3EEF3819.1040407@moser-inc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; FORMAT=flowed Content-ID: X-archive-position: 283 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp Got it [check.patch] Alan, thanks. On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Alan Hoyt wrote: > > From nashif@planux.com Wed Jun 18 22:16:09 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:16:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from averroes.planux.com (averroes.planux.com [216.13.38.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5J5G82x018407 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:16:09 -0700 Received: by averroes.planux.com (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5717D25059; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 01:10:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from planux.com (avicenna.home.planux.com [192.168.1.1]) by averroes.planux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E3B25031 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 01:10:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3EF14719.5030701@planux.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 01:16:09 -0400 From: Anas Nashif User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030527 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pcp@oss.sgi.com Subject: pcp 2.3.0 with recent core utils X-Enigmail-Version: 0.75.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070409010903020201010401" X-archive-position: 284 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: nashif@planux.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070409010903020201010401 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, utilities like tail, head and sort are stricter now with regard to command line options. The following patch fixes the problem. I had to patch to make pcp build for upcoming SuSE release. Cheers, Anas --------------070409010903020201010401 Content-Type: text/plain; name="pcp-2.3.0-coreutils.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="pcp-2.3.0-coreutils.patch" --- src/pmdas/weblog/Web.Allservers.pmchart +++ src/pmdas/weblog/Web.Allservers.pmchart @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ echo "/\"/s///g" >$tmp.sed pmprobe -I $* web.perserver.bytes.cached.total web.perserver.bytes.total > $tmp.pmprobe -l1=`head -1 $tmp.pmprobe` -l2=`tail -1 $tmp.pmprobe` +l1=`head -n 1 $tmp.pmprobe` +l2=`tail -n 1 $tmp.pmprobe` num_caches=`echo $l1 | cut -f2 -d\ ` num_servers=`echo $l2 | cut -f2 -d\ ` --- src/pmdas/weblog/Web.Perserver.Bytes.pmchart +++ src/pmdas/weblog/Web.Perserver.Bytes.pmchart @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ echo "/\"/s///g" >$tmp.sed pmprobe -I $* web.perserver.bytes.cached.total web.perserver.bytes.total > $tmp.pmprobe -l1=`head -1 $tmp.pmprobe` -l2=`tail -1 $tmp.pmprobe` +l1=`head -n 1 $tmp.pmprobe` +l2=`tail -n 1 $tmp.pmprobe` num_caches=`echo $l1 | cut -f2 -d\ ` num_servers=`echo $l2 | cut -f2 -d\ ` --- src/pmdas/weblog/Web.Perserver.Requests.pmchart +++ src/pmdas/weblog/Web.Perserver.Requests.pmchart @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ echo "/\"/s///g" >$tmp.sed pmprobe -I $* web.perserver.bytes.cached.total web.perserver.bytes.total > $tmp.pmprobe -l1=`head -1 $tmp.pmprobe` -l2=`tail -1 $tmp.pmprobe` +l1=`head -n 1 $tmp.pmprobe` +l2=`tail -n 1 $tmp.pmprobe` num_caches=`echo $l1 | cut -f2 -d\ ` num_servers=`echo $l2 | cut -f2 -d\ ` --- src/pmdas/weblog/server.sh +++ src/pmdas/weblog/server.sh @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ num_lines=`wc -l $access | $PCP_AWK_PROG '{print $1}'` if [ $num_lines -gt 1 ] then - num_fields=`tail -1 $access | cut -f3 -d\" | wc -w` + num_fields=`tail -n 1 $access | cut -f3 -d\" | wc -w` if [ $num_fields -eq 11 ] then accessRegex="NS_PROXY" --- src/pmns/Make.stdpmid +++ src/pmns/Make.stdpmid @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ -e '/^LAB /s/254/246/' \ -e '/^ASH /s/7/11/' done \ -| sort -n +1 -2 \ +| sort -n -k2,3 \ | uniq >$tmp.tmp error=false --------------070409010903020201010401-- From kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com Thu Jun 19 08:27:55 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Thu, 19 Jun 2003 08:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rj.sgi.com (rj.SGI.COM [192.82.208.96]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5JFRs2x005836 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 08:27:54 -0700 Received: from rattle.melbourne.sgi.com (rattle.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.55.145]) by rj.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.2/linux-outbound_gateway-1.2) with ESMTP id h5INnTE0016594 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:49:30 -0700 Received: from rattle.melbourne.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rattle.melbourne.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h5INmB61013441; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:48:11 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost (kenmcd@localhost) by rattle.melbourne.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id h5INm9AM013276; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:48:10 +1000 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: rattle.melbourne.sgi.com: kenmcd owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:48:09 +1000 From: Ken McDonell To: Alan Hoyt cc: pcp@oss.sgi.com, Mark Goodwin Subject: Re: configure.in In-Reply-To: <3EF0B744.1060501@moser-inc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 285 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp Alan ... where did your configure.in come from? I'm puzzled because our top-of-tree version internally has this problem fixed and the code fragments you're mailing look like an old version ... are you using the latest source from oss.sgi.com? If so, could you please send me the whole configure.in file you have? Our latest version works on all versions of RH we've been able to hit with a big stick, and IRIX ... and that's the version we believe is on oss.sgi.com. On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Alan Hoyt wrote: > Using the pcp-2.3.0-14 build: > > Redhat 7.x uses autoconf 2.1x and returns vaules for $ac_n and $ac_c - > so flags are set correctly > Redhat 8.x uses autoconf 2.5x and returns null for $ac_n and $ac_c - > clearing the prior echo flag values - so nothing gets set in pcp.conf > Solaris 8.x uses autoconf 2.5x and also returns nulls for $ac_n and > $ac_c - nothing gets set like above. > > Don't currently have access to a Redhat 9.0 box so I haven't checked. > > By removing the $ac_n and $ac_c assignments within configure.in - it > will return correct results for all three cases above resulting in the > correct pcp.conf. flag settings. > > - Alan - > > Alan Hoyt wrote: > > > Have you looked at /etc/pcp.conf - do you realize the pcp echo flags > > (i.e. PCP_ECHO_N and PCP_ECHO_C) are not being set following a clean > > make/make install? > > > > Has this already been fixed? > > > > - Alan - > > > > Alan Hoyt wrote: > > > >> this works for me unless you wanted something like: > >> > >> if (echo -n testing; echo 1,2,3) | sed s/-n/xn/ | grep xn >/dev/null; > >> then > >> ac_n= ac_c=' > >> ' ac_t=' ' > >> else > >> ac_n=-n ac_c= ac_t= > >> fi > >> else > >> ac_n= ac_c='\c' ac_t= > >> fi > >> > >> - Alan - > >> > >> Alan Hoyt wrote: > >> > >>> In configure.in, what's with $ac_n and $ac_c - these values are null > >>> and clear the echo flag settings made in the prior statement: > >>> > >>> if ( $echo "testing\c"; $echo 1,2,3 ) | grep c >/dev/null > >>> then > >>> if ( $echo -n testing; $echo 1,2,3 ) | sed s/-n/xn/ | grep xn > >>> >/dev/null > >>> then > >>> echo_n= echo_c= > >>> else > >>> echo_n=-n echo_c= > >>> fi > >>> else > >>> echo_n= echo_c='\c' > >>> fi > >>> > >>> dnl echo_n set to -n if echo understands -n to supress newline > >>> echo_n=$ac_n > >>> AC_SUBST(echo_n) > >>> dnl echo_c set to \c if echo understands \c to supress newline > >>> echo_c=$ac_c > >>> AC_SUBST(echo_c) > >>> > >>> Easy fix unless you need them for something. > >>> > >>> - Alan - > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > >> --- configure.in.orig 2003-06-16 14:52:49.540007000 +0000 > >> +++ configure.in 2003-06-16 22:42:12.070002000 +0000 > >> @@ -320,12 +320,7 @@ > >> else > >> echo_n= echo_c='\c' > >> fi > >> - > >> -dnl echo_n set to -n if echo understands -n to supress newline > >> -echo_n=$ac_n > >> AC_SUBST(echo_n) > >> -dnl echo_c set to \c if echo understands \c to supress newline > >> -echo_c=$ac_c > >> AC_SUBST(echo_c) > >> > >> dnl if /proc is not mounted, try and mount it > >> > >> > > > From ahoyt@moser-inc.com Thu Jun 19 08:49:51 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Thu, 19 Jun 2003 08:49:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcimail.moser-inc.com ([207.250.3.118]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5JFnn2x007120 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 08:49:50 -0700 Received: from moser-inc.com (r9100-vpn.moser-inc.com [207.250.3.126] (may be forged)) by mcimail.moser-inc.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5JFllgM028066; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 10:47:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3EF1DBA5.90404@moser-inc.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 10:49:57 -0500 From: Alan Hoyt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ken McDonell CC: pcp@oss.sgi.com, Mark Goodwin Subject: Re: configure.in References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 286 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: ahoyt@moser-inc.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp Ken McDonell wrote: >Alan ... where did your configure.in come from? > ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/pcp-2.3.0.src.tar.gz > >I'm puzzled because our top-of-tree version internally has this >problem fixed and the code fragments you're mailing look like an >old version ... are you using the latest source from oss.sgi.com? > Yes, patching against the latest production release - 2.3.0-14 [see above] > >If so, could you please send me the whole configure.in file you have? > Ok, but it's already on your server - no changes > >Our latest version works on all versions of RH we've been able to >hit with a big stick, and IRIX ... and that's the version we believe >is on oss.sgi.com. > > I used a stock Rehat 8.0 install + default Redhat network patchups - Alan - From kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com Thu Jun 19 16:24:54 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Thu, 19 Jun 2003 16:25:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rj.sgi.com (rj.SGI.COM [192.82.208.96]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5JNOq2x014796 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 16:24:53 -0700 Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by rj.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.2/linux-outbound_gateway-1.2) with SMTP id h5JNOkE0000376 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 16:24:46 -0700 Received: from kenj-ppp-a.melbourne.sgi.com (ppp-kenmcd.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.219]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id JAA26848; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:23:24 +1000 Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:26:02 +1000 (EST) From: kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com Reply-To: kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com To: Alan Hoyt cc: pcp@oss.sgi.com, Mark Goodwin Subject: Re: configure.in In-Reply-To: <3EF1DBA5.90404@moser-inc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 287 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Alan Hoyt wrote: > Ken McDonell wrote: > > >Alan ... where did your configure.in come from? > > > ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/pcp-2.3.0.src.tar.gz OK, that explains it ... you need the newer version (which I suspect should now be called 2.4) from ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/dev BUT, the -017 build there is bad (we suspect) ... concurrent investigations are proceeding ... we'll post to the list when the coast is clear again, and the new tarball in the dev directory will certainly contain the configure.in fix. > > > >I'm puzzled because our top-of-tree version internally has this > >problem fixed and the code fragments you're mailing look like an > >old version ... are you using the latest source from oss.sgi.com? > > > Yes, patching against the latest production release - 2.3.0-14 [see above] > > > > >If so, could you please send me the whole configure.in file you have? > > > Ok, but it's already on your server - no changes > > > > >Our latest version works on all versions of RH we've been able to > >hit with a big stick, and IRIX ... and that's the version we believe > >is on oss.sgi.com. > > > > > I used a stock Rehat 8.0 install + default Redhat network patchups > > > - Alan - > From ahoyt@moser-inc.com Fri Jun 20 07:57:55 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Fri, 20 Jun 2003 07:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcimail.moser-inc.com ([207.250.3.118]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5KEvs2x025732 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 07:57:55 -0700 Received: from moser-inc.com (r9100-vpn.moser-inc.com [207.250.3.126] (may be forged)) by mcimail.moser-inc.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5KEtogM012011; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:55:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3EF320CD.5090903@moser-inc.com> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:57:17 -0500 From: Alan Hoyt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030612 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com CC: pcp@oss.sgi.com, Mark Goodwin Subject: Re: configure.in References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mcimail.moser-inc.com id h5KEtogM012011 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by oss.sgi.com id h5KEvs2x025732 X-archive-position: 288 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: ahoyt@moser-inc.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com wrote: >BUT, the -017 build there is bad (we suspect) ... concurrent investigations >are proceeding ... we'll post to the list when the coast is clear again, >and the new tarball in the dev directory will certainly contain the >configure.in fix. > Three questions: Can you start using build numbers in your tarball naming convention (i.e. like your rpms)? Can you also release dev snapshots in tarball format? Can you push out dev snapshot’s more frequently – you’ve jumped from -14 to -17 which is now really 2.4? - Alan - From kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com Fri Jun 20 14:00:44 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Fri, 20 Jun 2003 14:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tolkor.sgi.com ([198.149.18.6]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5KL0h2x010364 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 14:00:44 -0700 Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by tolkor.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.2/linux-outbound_gateway-1.2) with SMTP id h5KLHXmO020236 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 16:17:34 -0500 Received: from kenj-ppp-a.melbourne.sgi.com (ppp-kenmcd.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.219]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id GAA07217; Sat, 21 Jun 2003 06:59:17 +1000 Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 07:02:04 +1000 (EST) From: kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com Reply-To: kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com To: Alan Hoyt cc: pcp@oss.sgi.com, Mark Goodwin Subject: Re: configure.in In-Reply-To: <3EF320CD.5090903@moser-inc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by oss.sgi.com id h5KL0h2x010364 X-archive-position: 289 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Alan Hoyt wrote: > kenmcd@melbourne.sgi.com wrote: > > >BUT, the -017 build there is bad (we suspect) ... concurrent investigations > >are proceeding ... we'll post to the list when the coast is clear again, > >and the new tarball in the dev directory will certainly contain the > >configure.in fix. > > > Three questions: > > Can you start using build numbers in your tarball naming convention > (i.e. like your rpms)? Sure, I've done this. > Can you also release dev snapshots in tarball format? Hmm ... not sure why this was not done ... Mark? Unless there is some reason that makes sense, we'll start doing this. > Can you push out dev snapshot’s more frequently – you’ve jumped from -14 > to -17 which is now really 2.4? There are 3 issues here ... (a) frequency ... that is really driven by urgency/magnitude of changes we have received/done, and is independent of the numbering scheme (b) for a variety of reasons, missing build numbers on oss.sgi.com (-15 and -16 above) do not necessarily mean there has been functional changes of import that were not available through oss.sgi.com ... remember oss.sgi.com is but one portal into a complex s/w project that has the open source releases as only part of the puzzle (c) 2.3.0-17 was a mistake, after the 2.3.0 real release, the dev series should have become 2.3.1-x or 2.4.0-x ... since I only have minor stuff so far, I'm QAing 2.3.1-1 at the moment, and expect that to be on oss.sgi.com within a few days (we'll mail to the list when this happens). Thanks for the feedback Alan. From chris.howland@moser-inc.com Fri Jun 27 12:25:33 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list pcp); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcimail.moser-inc.com ([207.250.3.118]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5RJPW2x011314 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:25:33 -0700 Received: from INLAPCHOWLAND (r9100-vpn.moser-inc.com [207.250.3.126] (may be forged)) by mcimail.moser-inc.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5RJNL7R007637 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:23:21 -0500 (EST) From: "Chris Howland" To: Subject: sybase agent Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:26:37 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4925.2800 X-archive-position: 290 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: pcp-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: chris.howland@moser-inc.com Precedence: bulk X-list: pcp Well, after some investigation, I discovered the manual pages for the original Sybase PMDA. I didn't see a complete list of metrics supported, though. Looks like system 10 is the most recent version supported? Mark, is it possible to get this Sybase agent open sourced? I would be willing to take anything you have, and clean it up, get it working on Linux, and get it working with newer versions of Sybase ASE. If that isn't possible, can I at least get an output of "pminfo -fT sybase" ?? Thanks! Chris Chris Howland chris.howland@moser-inc.com