From owner-ogl-sample@oss.sgi.com Fri Dec 8 09:31:07 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:30:47 -0800 Received: from imo-r19.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.73]:19962 "EHLO imo-r19.mail.aol.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:30:38 -0800 Received: from Drcadmando@aol.com by imo-r19.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.34.) id 4.a3.f12a12f (17234) for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:30:19 -0500 (EST) From: Drcadmando@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:30:18 EST Subject: [ogl-sample] Windows version? To: ogl-sample@oss.sgi.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_a3.f12a12f.276274aa_boundary" Content-Disposition: Inline X-Mailer: Unknown sub 171 Sender: owner-ogl-sample@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: ogl-sample@oss.sgi.com Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;ogl-sample-outgoing --part1_a3.f12a12f.276274aa_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I downloaded the sample files- thanx much. I see they packaged in a.tgz, and I saw a lot of commentary re LINUX, which I have and will use these files in. However, my primary interest at the moment is a Windows 98 implementation, and of course I could just convert the unix format to dos format. But I wonder, is there any specifically Windows activity for these source files? I have the Windows .dll files, so somewhere there must be a project of some sort with its own makefile, or ide, or dsw, or something. Marvin E Walden --part1_a3.f12a12f.276274aa_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I downloaded the sample files- thanx much. I see they packaged in a.tgz, and
I saw a lot of commentary re LINUX, which I have and will use these files in.
However, my primary interest at the moment is a Windows 98 implementation,
and of course I could just convert the unix format to dos format. But I
wonder, is there any specifically Windows activity for these source files? I
have the Windows .dll files, so somewhere there must be a project of some
sort with its own makefile, or ide, or dsw, or something.

Marvin E Walden
--part1_a3.f12a12f.276274aa_boundary-- From owner-ogl-sample@oss.sgi.com Fri Dec 8 18:10:00 2000 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 18:09:50 -0800 Received: from web9505.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.129.135]:14596 "HELO web9505.mail.yahoo.com") by oss.sgi.com with SMTP id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 18:09:28 -0800 Message-ID: <20001209020923.95224.qmail@web9505.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [209.105.155.54] by web9505.mail.yahoo.com; Fri, 08 Dec 2000 18:09:23 PST Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 18:09:23 -0800 (PST) From: David Sankel Subject: Re: [ogl-sample] Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: Thanxs for SGI's GLU 1.3 libs ! To: ogl-sample@oss.sgi.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-ogl-sample@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: ogl-sample@oss.sgi.com Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;ogl-sample-outgoing --- Stephen J Baker wrote: > > IMHO, 99% of widely distributed OpenGL apps for > Linux will not be > using the problematic functions in GLU-classic - > because those programs > were almost certainly developed using that library > and either don't use > the broken functions or have work-arounds that work > OK. Hence most > existing applications will get no benefit from > SGI-GLU. In any case, > the kinds of applications that need things like > tesselators and spline > patches tend not to be games - more often they are > things like scientific > visualisers and custom applications which are not > widely circulated. It should probably be noted that SGI's new OpenInventor requires the SGI version of GLU to compile, at least that's been my experience. David J. Sankel __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/