From owner-lockmeter@oss.sgi.com  Sat Sep  4 13:45:04 1999
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by oss.sgi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA25426
	for lockmeter-outgoing; Sat, 4 Sep 1999 13:45:04 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: oss.sgi.com: majordomo set sender to owner-lockmeter@oss.sgi.com using -f
Received: from fenrus.demon.nl (mail@fenrus.demon.nl [212.238.78.16])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA25423
	for <lockmeter@oss.sgi.com>; Sat, 4 Sep 1999 13:45:02 -0700
Received: from arjan by fenrus.demon.nl with local-esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
	id 11NMg0-0005Hb-00; Sat, 4 Sep 1999 22:44:44 +0200
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 1999 22:44:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@fenrus.demon.nl>
To: lockmeter@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Lockmeter and webservers
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.05.9909042241200.18502-100000@fenrus.demon.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-lockmeter@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

In the Lockmeter FAQ, you mention numbers of a CPU-hog like program.
Did you do the same thing for webservers?

I personally would be very interested in the numbers for kHTTPd (of which
I am the author), and the difference the new TCP/IP stack in 2.3.15 makes.
(the difference between 2.3.14 and 2.3.15 shoud be enormous on a 4CPU
machine)

Greetings,
  Arjan van de Ven