From hawkes@sgi.com Wed Sep 11 08:03:24 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list kernprof); Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:03:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.SGI.COM [204.94.214.10] (may be forged)) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g8BF3OtG020961 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:03:24 -0700 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id IAA04385 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:07:56 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (hawkes@sgi.com) Received: from wrlarun (sshgate.corp.sgi.com [169.238.216.146]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA53344; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:06:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <001301c259a4$a0c997f0$6601a8c0@attbi.com> From: "John Hawkes" To: "Helen Pang" Cc: , References: Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] kernel profiling tools ported to 2.5.31 Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:05:12 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-archive-position: 2 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: kernprof-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: kernprof-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: hawkes@sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: kernprof > Please correct me if I am wrong that I > understand the version of gcc with the patches that are available on the > sgi's kernprof website are 2.9.x. Yes, indeed. Some subsequent versions of gcc appear to not need that patch, but yet the -pg option doesn't produce viable binaries. As Dave Hansen pointed out, gcc-3.0 and gcc-3.1 appear to work correctly (without any patches for -pg). I personally had some success months ago with gcc-3.0 (or perhaps it was 3.0.1?), but at the time I believe I remember seeing concerns on the linux-kernel mailing list that gcc-3.0.x had problems with some parts of kernel code. I'd say that if 3.1 works for you, then go with that! John Hawkes From anupama.sonnenahalli@amd.com Thu Sep 26 09:39:11 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list kernprof); Thu, 26 Sep 2002 09:39:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from amdext2.amd.com (amdext2.amd.com [163.181.251.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g8QGdAtG012586 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 09:39:10 -0700 Received: from ssvlgs01.amd.com (ssvlgs01.amd.com [139.95.250.16]) by amdext2.amd.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/AMD) with SMTP id LAA13124 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 11:39:03 -0500 (CDT) From: anupama.sonnenahalli@amd.com Received: from 139.95.250.1 by ssvlgs01.amd.com with ESMTP (Tumbleweed MMS SMTP Relay (MMS v4.7);); Thu, 26 Sep 2002 09:39:01 -0700 X-Server-Uuid: 02753650-11b0-11d5-bbc5-00508bf987eb Received: from caexmta7.amd.com (caexmta7.amd.com [139.95.53.22]) by amdint.amd.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/AMD) with ESMTP id JAA01469 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 09:39:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by caexmta7.amd.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 09:39:01 -0700 Message-ID: To: kernprof@oss.sgi.com Subject: Kernprof support for mips32 Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 09:38:59 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-WSS-ID: 118DE7AF43996-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 3 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: kernprof-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: kernprof-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: anupama.sonnenahalli@amd.com Precedence: bulk X-list: kernprof Was wondering if kernprof is supported for mips32 architecture. I see the support for mips64, does it mean that mips32 is supported as well? Your response is appreciated. Regards, Anu