From alexl@redhat.com Mon Mar 1 00:54:54 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list fam); Mon, 01 Mar 2004 00:55:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i218srKO024908 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 00:54:54 -0800 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i218spb19568; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 03:54:51 -0500 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i218sp831791; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 03:54:51 -0500 Received: from localhost (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i218sjeF007372; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 03:54:46 -0500 Subject: Re: what happens if client core-dumps? From: Alexander Larsson To: mdt@emdete.de Cc: fam@oss.sgi.com In-Reply-To: <20040229153635.GB2559@emdete.de> References: <20040229153635.GB2559@emdete.de> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1078131289.29202.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.3.92 (Preview Release) Date: 01 Mar 2004 09:54:50 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 220 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: fam-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: fam-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: alexl@redhat.com Precedence: bulk X-list: fam On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 16:36, M. Dietrich wrote: > Hi, > > i recently had troubles with fam if a client program (nautilus) > coredumps while watching a directory. fam keeps looking into it and i > couldn't unmount that resource until i stopped fam. > > is this a bug in fam or a mistake in my setup? This is a bug in fam. See my recent post to this list for a patch. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc alexl@redhat.com alla@lysator.liu.se He's a one-legged small-town hairdresser who dotes on his loving old ma. She's a manipulative kleptomaniac museum curator trying to make a difference in a man's world. They fight crime! From 1@pervalidus.net Tue Mar 9 00:14:09 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list fam); Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:14:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from trinity-auth.correio.tnext.com.br (inova102.correio.tnext.com.br [200.222.67.102]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i298E7KO001260 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 00:14:08 -0800 Received: (qmail 9635 invoked by uid 0); 9 Mar 2004 08:14:05 -0000 X-qfilter-stat: ok X-Analyze: Velop Mail Shield v0.0.4 X-Velop-Vscan: no virus detected X-Inova-Extscan: attachments authorized Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.5?) (fredlwm@200.141.116.140) by trinity with SMTP; 9 Mar 2004 08:14:05 -0000 Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 05:14:04 -0300 (BRT) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_L=2E_W=2E_Meunier?= <1@pervalidus.net> To: fam@oss.sgi.com Subject: Patch for builddir != srcdir Message-ID: X-Archive: encrypt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1765635781-1078820044=:8351" X-archive-position: 222 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: fam-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: fam-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: 1@pervalidus.net Precedence: bulk X-list: fam Content-Length: 1095 Lines: 27 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --0-1765635781-1078820044=:8351 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Attached. -- http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html --0-1765635781-1078820044=:8351 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="Makefile.am.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Makefile.am.diff" LS0tIE1ha2VmaWxlLmFtLm9sZAkyMDAzLTAxLTE4IDIzOjU1OjEwLjAwMDAw MDAwMCAtMDIwMA0KKysrIE1ha2VmaWxlLmFtCTIwMDQtMDMtMDkgMDU6MTI6 MzYuMDAwMDAwMDAwIC0wMzAwDQpAQCAtNyw3ICs3LDcgQEANCiAJQ2xpZW50 LmggXA0KIAlmYW0uYysrDQogDQotbGliZmFtX2xhX0xERkxBR1MgPSAtZXhw b3J0LXN5bWJvbHMgZmFtLnN5bQ0KK2xpYmZhbV9sYV9MREZMQUdTID0gLWV4 cG9ydC1zeW1ib2xzICQoc3JjZGlyKS9mYW0uc3ltDQogbGliZmFtX2xhX0xJ QkFERCA9IC1sc3RkYysrDQogDQogRVhUUkFfRElTVCA9IGZhbS5zeW0NCg== --0-1765635781-1078820044=:8351-- From dviner@yahoo-inc.com Wed Mar 10 08:51:10 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list fam); Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:51:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mrout2.yahoo.com (mrout2.yahoo.com [216.145.54.172]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i2AGp9KO028842 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:51:10 -0800 Received: from penxng.smca.yahoo.com (penxng.smca.yahoo.com [204.119.24.188]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/y.out) with ESMTP id i2AGnaY3099798 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:49:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by penxng.smca.yahoo.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:47:28 -0800 Message-ID: <263A1F717ECDED40AA969F98D1CF122E01A4F36E@penxng.smca.yahoo.com> From: "Viner, David" To: "'fam@oss.sgi.com'" Subject: sourceforge and 2.6.10 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:47:25 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-archive-position: 223 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: fam-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: fam-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: dviner@yahoo-inc.com Precedence: bulk X-list: fam Content-Length: 432 Lines: 9 It seems like no development is happening against the 2.7.0 codebase that's currently in sourceforge. However, I think we've seen two or three patches to 2.6.10. I think we should remove the code in sourceforge now, commit the 2.6.10 codebase, apply the patches (e.g., dnotify), and publish a 2.6.11. I am happy to do the leg work of the removal, reseeding with 2.6.10, applying the patches, and helping with the release. dave From joerg@babylon.wendlandnet.de Wed Mar 10 11:13:57 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list fam); Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:14:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from babylon.wendlandnet.de (babylon.wendlandnet.de [212.75.33.26] (may be forged)) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i2AJDuKO005896 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:13:57 -0800 Received: (qmail-ldap/ctrl 14782 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Mar 2004 19:13:54 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 20:13:54 +0100 From: Joerg Wendland To: "Viner, David" Cc: "'fam@oss.sgi.com'" Subject: Re: sourceforge and 2.6.10 Message-ID: <20040310191354.GD21277@babylon.wendlandnet.de> References: <263A1F717ECDED40AA969F98D1CF122E01A4F36E@penxng.smca.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RhUH2Ysw6aD5utA4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <263A1F717ECDED40AA969F98D1CF122E01A4F36E@penxng.smca.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-archive-position: 224 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: fam-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: fam-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: joergland@debian.org Precedence: bulk X-list: fam Content-Length: 1251 Lines: 42 --RhUH2Ysw6aD5utA4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David, Viner, David, on 2004-03-10, 08:47, you wrote: > It seems like no development is happening against the 2.7.0 codebase that= 's > currently in sourceforge. However, I think we've seen two or three patches > to 2.6.10. I think we should remove the code in sourceforge now, commit = the > 2.6.10 codebase, apply the patches (e.g., dnotify), and publish a 2.6.11.= =20 That's not true. Since I am the maintainer of fam Debian packages I have some patches against 2.7 in use that were ported from 2.6.10, including the DNotify patch. I am currently working with the upstream maintainer to integrate these patches. Please stay tuned... Joerg --=20 Joerg "joergland" Wendland GPG: 51CF8417 FP: 79C0 7671 AFC7 315E 657A F318 57A3 7FBD 51CF 8417 --RhUH2Ysw6aD5utA4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAT2jyV6N/vVHPhBcRAgH1AKCRE7chxzL9CYMT/8RWDgi63N0CVgCdEt6l x+RrGKUGcaGzkPpyqrTell4= =78wD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RhUH2Ysw6aD5utA4-- From dviner@yahoo-inc.com Wed Mar 10 11:29:00 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list fam); Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:29:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mrout2.yahoo.com (mrout2.yahoo.com [216.145.54.172]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i2AJT0KO006464 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:29:00 -0800 Received: from penxng.smca.yahoo.com (penxng.smca.yahoo.com [204.119.24.188]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/y.out) with ESMTP id i2AJSOY3032378 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:28:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by penxng.smca.yahoo.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:26:17 -0800 Message-ID: <263A1F717ECDED40AA969F98D1CF122E01A4F379@penxng.smca.yahoo.com> From: "Viner, David" To: "'fam@oss.sgi.com'" Subject: RE: sourceforge and 2.6.10 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:26:16 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-archive-position: 225 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: fam-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: fam-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: dviner@yahoo-inc.com Precedence: bulk X-list: fam Content-Length: 1113 Lines: 37 Hi Joerg, I didn't realize work was happening on the 2.7 branch. Have you sent messages to this list regarding your patches? Is there another FAM development list? dave -----Original Message----- From: Joerg Wendland [mailto:joergland@debian.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 11:14 AM To: Viner, David Cc: 'fam@oss.sgi.com' Subject: Re: sourceforge and 2.6.10 David, Viner, David, on 2004-03-10, 08:47, you wrote: > It seems like no development is happening against the 2.7.0 codebase that's > currently in sourceforge. However, I think we've seen two or three patches > to 2.6.10. I think we should remove the code in sourceforge now, commit the > 2.6.10 codebase, apply the patches (e.g., dnotify), and publish a 2.6.11. That's not true. Since I am the maintainer of fam Debian packages I have some patches against 2.7 in use that were ported from 2.6.10, including the DNotify patch. I am currently working with the upstream maintainer to integrate these patches. Please stay tuned... Joerg -- Joerg "joergland" Wendland GPG: 51CF8417 FP: 79C0 7671 AFC7 315E 657A F318 57A3 7FBD 51CF 8417 From mraymond@sgi.com Wed Mar 10 17:51:31 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list fam); Wed, 10 Mar 2004 17:51:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from zok.sgi.com (mtvcafw.SGI.COM [192.48.171.6]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i2B1pVKO027915 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 17:51:31 -0800 Received: from flecktone.americas.sgi.com (flecktone.americas.sgi.com [192.48.203.135]) by zok.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/linux-outbound_gateway-1.1) with ESMTP id i2B1pP02021062 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 17:51:26 -0800 Received: from daisy-e236.americas.sgi.com (daisy-e236.americas.sgi.com [128.162.236.214]) by flecktone.americas.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.10/SGI_generic_relay-1.2) with ESMTP id i2B1pPKe35250379; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 19:51:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanatos.americas.sgi.com (xanatos.americas.sgi.com [128.162.233.67]) by daisy-e236.americas.sgi.com (8.12.9/SGI-server-1.8) with ESMTP id i2B1pPXa1060380; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 19:51:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanatos.americas.sgi.com by xanatos.americas.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/SGI-client-1.7) via ESMTP id i2B1pONT092102; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 19:51:24 -0600 (CST) Received: (from mraymond@localhost) by xanatos.americas.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id i2B1pOXR092115; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 19:51:24 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 19:51:24 -0600 From: Michael Raymond To: "Viner, David" Cc: "'fam@oss.sgi.com'" Subject: Re: sourceforge and 2.6.10 Message-ID: <20040310195124.D91965@xanatos.americas.sgi.com> References: <263A1F717ECDED40AA969F98D1CF122E01A4F379@penxng.smca.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <263A1F717ECDED40AA969F98D1CF122E01A4F379@penxng.smca.yahoo.com>; from dviner@yahoo-inc.com on Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:26:16AM -0800 X-archive-position: 226 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: fam-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: fam-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: mraymond@sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: fam Content-Length: 1781 Lines: 50 There isn't a separate list, he's just sent me a few patches privately. As I've mentioned to a few people, I'm currently on military leave and so can't devote any real time to the project. My desire is that FAM "work" on IRIX. Past that I'm just here to facilitate the project. Personally I think it'd be easier to go back to 2.6.10 for a fresh start, but you guys will drive everything. Michael On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:26:16AM -0800, Viner, David wrote: > Hi Joerg, > > I didn't realize work was happening on the 2.7 branch. Have you sent > messages to this list regarding your patches? Is there another FAM > development list? > > dave > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joerg Wendland [mailto:joergland@debian.org] > Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 11:14 AM > To: Viner, David > Cc: 'fam@oss.sgi.com' > Subject: Re: sourceforge and 2.6.10 > > > David, > > Viner, David, on 2004-03-10, 08:47, you wrote: > > It seems like no development is happening against the 2.7.0 codebase > that's > > currently in sourceforge. However, I think we've seen two or three patches > > to 2.6.10. I think we should remove the code in sourceforge now, commit > the > > 2.6.10 codebase, apply the patches (e.g., dnotify), and publish a 2.6.11. > > > That's not true. Since I am the maintainer of fam Debian packages I > have some patches against 2.7 in use that were ported from 2.6.10, > including the DNotify patch. I am currently working with the upstream > maintainer to integrate these patches. Please stay tuned... > > Joerg > > -- > Joerg "joergland" Wendland > GPG: 51CF8417 FP: 79C0 7671 AFC7 315E 657A F318 57A3 7FBD 51CF 8417 -- Michael A. Raymond Office: (651) 683-3434 Core OS Scheduling Group Real-Time Lead From gilson.soares@mandic.com.br Thu Mar 18 13:23:54 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list fam); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:23:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.uol.com.br (smtpout5.uol.com.br [200.221.11.58]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i2ILNeKO013605 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:23:43 -0800 Received: from gw.gss.com.br (200-221-35-244.speedy.speeduol.com.br [200.221.35.244]) by scorpion5.uol.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F414847D for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:02:43 -0300 (BRT) Received: from adminpc.mandic.com.br (172-16-0-251.gss.com.br [172.16.0.251] (may be forged)) by gw.gss.com.br (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2IL2f63004807 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:02:43 -0300 Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040318173729.01b07560@imap.mandic.com.br> X-Sender: gilson.soares@mandic.com.br@imap.mandic.com.br (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:02:45 -0300 To: fam@oss.sgi.com From: Gilson Soares Subject: Daemon to execute commands if the file changes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-archive-position: 227 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: fam-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: fam-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: gilson.soares@mandic.com.br Precedence: bulk X-list: fam Content-Length: 538 Lines: 19 Hello, I read the whole documentation, FAQ and list archive and I didn't find answer to my doubt. I use Red Hat 9 and fam-2.6.8-9. To test if everything is ok, I installed fileschanged-0.5.3-1.i386.rpm. fileschanged reports files changed correctly. Everything is working. I'm not a programer. So I expect to have a daemon where you configure which files you are monitoring and which operating system command will be executed if the file have changed, in a simple .conf text file. Does this tool exists ? Thanks -Gilson Soares From mdiehl@diehlnet.com Thu Mar 18 21:59:50 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list fam); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 21:59:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp10.atl.mindspring.net (smtp10.atl.mindspring.net [207.69.200.246]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i2J5xnKO006011 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 21:59:49 -0800 Received: from h-69-3-72-218.phndaz91.dynamic.covad.net ([69.3.72.218] helo=dominion.dyndns.org) by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1B4D2n-0006N6-00; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:59:45 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.5] (helo=gentoo) by dominion.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B4D2m-0001V1-Mp; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:59:44 -0700 From: "Mike Diehl (Encrypted email preferred)" Reply-To: mdiehl@diehlnet.com To: Gilson Soares Subject: Re: Daemon to execute commands if the file changes Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:59:39 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040318173729.01b07560@imap.mandic.com.br> In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.2.20040318173729.01b07560@imap.mandic.com.br> Cc: fam@oss.sgi.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200403182259.51688.mdiehl@diehlnet.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by oss.sgi.com id i2J5xnKO006011 X-archive-position: 228 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: fam-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: fam-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: mdiehl@diehlnet.com Precedence: bulk X-list: fam Content-Length: 1334 Lines: 43 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm actually working on such a program. I have it working, but I want to add a few more features before I release it. It will be open source. It's written in perl. The original intent is to have a program that can keep multiple machines in sync with each other... with offline synchronization capability. I'm going to have to save these features for version 2, though. On Thursday 18 March 2004 02:02 pm, you wrote: > Hello, > > I read the whole documentation, FAQ and list archive and I didn't find > answer to my doubt. > > I use Red Hat 9 and fam-2.6.8-9. To test if everything is ok, I installed > fileschanged-0.5.3-1.i386.rpm. fileschanged reports files changed > correctly. Everything is working. > > I'm not a programer. So I expect to have a daemon where you configure which > files you are monitoring and which operating system command will be > executed if the file have changed, in a simple .conf text file. > > Does this tool exists ? > > Thanks > -Gilson Soares - -- Mike gpg key: http://diehlnet.com/~mdiehl/mdiehl.asc 83AD D927 758D 4BFC A800 0277 4B26 75A4 F0D1 C7EB -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAWoxSSyZ1pPDRx+sRAq5uAJ9wdBudoMw0PtACMUwFky5vTCiiuQCffW1P 4VAO5+f8Bk3GkN5Xx2bY7+I= =lWon -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----