Matt Robinson wrote:
>Masashige Kotani wrote:
>> I am a Jyunji's co-worker too.
>> I am making a new command for module support of lkcd as in the above
>Hi, Masashige-san. I have no problems including this into the tree,
>as long as it isn't conflicting with Andreas' work, and it can be
>packaged nicely together. The conflict issue is just to make sure
>multiple LKCD developers are working on the same page. I'm all for
>the right thing going into the code base regardless, I just don't
>want to see conflicts in the way the work is completed.
I can't see any conflicts.
The only general restriction is as follows:
If you have 2 symbol tables containing information for the same symbol,
this symbol will be found in the symbol table that was first added.
Example: You have a System.map containing already all symbols of all of
your loaded modules.
This table is loaded during lcrash startup. If you load a further symbol
table for one
of your loaded modules (using 'symtab -a'), then this is of no use, because
the symbol information
is received via System.map that was first loaded.
Linux for eServer Development
Tel : +49-7031-16-4640
Notes mail : Andreas Herrmann/GERMANY/IBM@IBMDE
email : aherrman@xxxxxxxxxx