lkcd
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: how to apply kernel patch for both lkcd and kdb ?

To: "Matt D. Robinson" <yakker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: how to apply kernel patch for both lkcd and kdb ?
From: Moo Kim <Moo.Kim@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:54:46 -0700
Cc: Moo Kim <Moo.Kim@xxxxxxx>, rbharata@xxxxxxxxxx, lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3B4A1850.81ACE51@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from yakker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 01:47:12PM -0700
References: <CA256A84.00128569.00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010709083321.C26721@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B4A1850.81ACE51@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
 Hi Matt,

 Your suggstion of '.' worked fine.  

 Thanks again,

 Moo 

On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 01:47:12PM -0700, Matt D. Robinson wrote:
> Try '.' for 'modulename'.  So 'co .'.
> 
> --Matt
> 
> Moo Kim wrote:
> > 
> >  Hi,
> > 
> >  How can I get a latest snapshot of lkcd from sourceforge.net ?
> >  I am not versed with cvs.
> > 
> >  I followed the steps in the Anonymous CVS Access WEB page:
> > 
> >  cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/lkcd login
> > 
> >  cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/lkcd
> >  co modulename
> > 
> >  I was able to login fine, but I am now stuck in step #2.  What do I
> >  specify for 'modulename' ?  I tried lkcd, 2.4, lkcdutils, and
> >  they all failed with connection refused message.   I am not sure
> >  whether the connection refused message is caused by improper modulename
> >  or anonymous ftp server is just busy.
> > 
> > [root@kimlx cvs]# cvs -z3 
> > -dpserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/lkcd co 2.4
> > usw-pr-cvs.sourceforge.net: Connection refused
> > cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if 
> > any)
> > [root@kimlx cvs]# cvs -z3 
> > -dpserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/lkcd co lkcdutils
> > usw-pr-cvs.sourceforge.net: Connection refused
> > cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if 
> > any)
> > 
> >  Thanks,
> > 
> >  Moo
> > 
> > On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 10:14:08PM -0500, rbharata@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, 2.4.4 would be the right kernel since latest lkcd is available on
> > > this.  Apply kdb patch first(as it has more files than lkcd) and then lkcd
> > > patch. If this the order, I have seen that only some 4 hunks fail, which
> > > can be easily fixed manually.
> > >
> > > Note: The same should also work for 2.4.2 kernel.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Bharata.
> > >
> > > Bharata. B. Rao
> > > IBM Linux Technology Center,
> > > IBM Software Labs, India.
> > >
> > > E-mail : rbharata@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > Phone : 91-80-5262355, Extn : 3962
> > >
> > >
> > > Moo Kim <Moo.Kim@xxxxxxx> on 07/07/2001 01:31:07 PM
> > >
> > > Please respond to Moo Kim <Moo.Kim@xxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > To:   lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > cc:    (bcc: Bharata B Rao/India/IBM)
> > > Subject:  how to apply kernel patch for both lkcd and kdb ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  Hi,
> > >
> > >  I am interested in installing both kdb and lkcd on linux
> > >  box running RedHat 7.1, kernel 2.4.2.   Has anyone done
> > >  this ?   I know I might have to upgrade kernel to 2.4.4
> > >  in order to apply the patch.  The question is which order
> > >  I need to apply the kernel patch ?   I think the patch
> > >  assumes to apply on the clean kernel source.  Anyone
> > >  has any suggestion on this ?
> > >
> > >  Thanks in advance,
> > >
> > >  Moo Kim    Moo.Kim@xxxxxxx
> > >  NCR Corporation
> > >  ph: 858-485-2233 fax: 858-485-2032
> > >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>