lkcd
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: snia lcrash questions

To: Dave Craft <dcraft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: snia lcrash questions
From: Moo Kim <Moo.Kim@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:25:14 -0800
Cc: "Matt D. Robinson" <yakker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, pearlste@xxxxxxxxxxxx, lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200103141749.LAA45332@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from dcraft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 11:49:04AM -0600
References: <3AAFAC82.6FFB0C78@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200103141749.LAA45332@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-lkcd@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
 I somehow assumed that lcrash was capable of debugging 
 kernel modules.   I guess not.   Is it possible to 
 incorporate Dave's patch into lcrash distribution 
 because it will be extremely useful for kernel module 
 developer ?
   
 Thanks,

 Moo Kim    Moo.Kim@xxxxxxx
 NCR Corporation
  
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 11:49:04AM -0600, Dave Craft wrote:
> 
> >You can't use a module to call panic().  lcrash isn't capable (yet)
> >of debugging kernel modules.  The resulting crash dump may not be
> 
>       Regarding the above statement about inability to 
>       debug kernel modules.  Did you guys ever get around
>       to looking/rewriting the patch I supplied for getting tracebacks
>       in kernel modules?  The patch still applies and still
>       works.  Its buried in the archives of this mailing list.
> 
>       Is there any idea on when we'd see comparable 
>       function make it into lcrash?
> 
> -- 
>       Mail : dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx      Phone : 512-838-8248            
>                   I am Jack's email closing

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>