linux-origin
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: glibc-devel/statvfs etc.

To: linux-origin@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: glibc-devel/statvfs etc.
From: Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan <ananth@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 15:59:18 -0800
References: <3A2EA099.2EA8365D@xxxxxxx> <20001207002544.B952@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-origin@xxxxxxxxxxx
Ralf Baechle wrote:
> 

> I have a 80% port of Redhat 7.0 which is based on a fairly recent glibc.
> It's running mostly solid for me and that also inludes things such as
> threading and binary compatibility with glibc 2.0.  I'm uploading the
> glibc 2.1.95 now to oss.sgi.com:/pub/linux/mips/glibc/; the rest of the
> distribution will follow in about two days.  Not earlier for bandwidth
> reasons, I'm on a 28k8 bps diet ;-)

That's great! Few questions: By 80% do you mean that there are some obscure
packages are not available? Does glibc 2.1.95 also contain glibc-devel?
Can one upgrade only glibc (and glibc-devel) on one of our origins
which has Hard Hat 5.1?


> 
> Note, you will also need rpm4 to install these rpms.  rpm3 will not install
> rpm4 packages, therefore you need to untar the rpm4 binary tarballs first,
> then use it to install the rpm4 package properly, then glibc.
> 
> Note it's still only a 32-bit library.  The kernel is designed to be able
> to run a 64-bit userland but we currently don't have the necessary support
> for that in gas and glibc, just to mention the most important packages
> that cannot yet support a 64-bit userland..

I'm compiling the xfs cmds (user utilities) in 32-bit mode so that's ok.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan ("ananth")
Member Technical Staff, SGI.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>