linux-origin
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: update_mmu_cache

from [Ralf Baechle] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Kanoj Sarcar <kanoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: update_mmu_cache
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 00:29:47 +0200
Cc: linux-origin@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200007242129.OAA22407@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from kanoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 02:29:32PM -0700
References: <20000724215401.A16062@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200007242129.OAA22407@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-origin@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 02:29:32PM -0700, Kanoj Sarcar wrote:

> A quick look does not give me any clues ... but I am not looking at
> the cache patch that you sent yet ...

The patch should not have influence on that behaviour but I didn't yet
test that.

  Ralf
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: update_mmu_cache, Kanoj Sarcar
Next by Date:  Re: update_mmu_cache, Ralf Baechle
Previous by Thread:  Re: update_mmu_cache, Kanoj Sarcar
Next by Thread:  state of mips64 port, Kanoj Sarcar
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]