| To: | hawkes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (John Hawkes) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: kernel compile time |
| From: | kanoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Kanoj Sarcar) |
| Date: | Thu, 1 Jun 2000 11:42:32 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | kanoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Kanoj Sarcar), ananth@xxxxxxx (Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan), linux-origin@xxxxxxxxxxx, skunx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <021301bfcbf5$b3ac41e0$ce059aa3@xxxxxxxxxxxx> from "John Hawkes" at Jun 01, 2000 11:17:52 AM |
| Sender: | owner-linux-origin@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > > 13:28 seconds for a 1 way make is just not an acceptable number. > > But if that time is dominated by user time (vs. kernel time), doesn't > that suggest that the slow compiles are due to a combination of (1) a > compiler comprised of inefficiently emitted code, and/or (2) inefficient > libraries, and/or (3) cache thrashing? > > John H. > True. And the other culprit is probably all the locore code (like fast tlb handlers, inital syscall/intr/pagefault code) that executes before the timers are switched from user to kernel/system. Kanoj |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: kernel compile time, Kanoj Sarcar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: kernel compile time, Kanoj Sarcar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: kernel compile time, John Hawkes |
| Next by Thread: | Re: kernel compile time, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |