| To: | ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx (Ralf Baechle) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Kernel hang ... |
| From: | kanoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Kanoj Sarcar) |
| Date: | Wed, 10 May 2000 10:51:41 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | linux-origin@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20000510142407.A7547@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Ralf Baechle" at May 10, 2000 02:24:07 PM |
| Sender: | owner-linux-origin@xxxxxxxxxxx |
>
> I've verified that with just a single processor enabled the SMP kernel will
> hang even earlier, right after the ``POSIX conformance testing'' printout.
>
> Investigating ...
>
> Ralf
>
Depends on how you "disable" the other processors. Prom level disabling
has not been tested at all, and I would suggest leaving that for a little
later (maybe next week), since it also ties in to processor virtual/physical
numbering.
If you want to come up on a CONFIG_SMP kernel with just 1 processor,
hack do_cpumask(), specifically, #if 0 out the code block
if (cpuid > *highest)
*highest = cpuid;
/* Only let it join in if it's marked enabled */
if (acpu->cpu_info.flags & KLINFO_ENABLE) {
CPUMASK_SETB(*boot_cpumask, cpuid);
cpus_found++;
}
Kanoj
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Kernel hang ..., Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Kernel hang ..., Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Kernel hang ..., Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Kernel hang ..., Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |