| To: | Joe Korty <joe.korty@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [kdb] new kdb over kgdb |
| From: | Martin Hicks <mort@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:32:19 -0500 |
| Cc: | kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20091026150500.GA22755@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20091026150500.GA22755@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Joe Korty wrote: > I've been playing a little with the new kdb-over-kgdb. > In some ways it is better than the old kdb. Unlike the > old kdb, I see no misbehavior on my x86_64 box using the > new. > > Why not make an official release, as kdb-5.0, of what is > there today? Or perhaps, checkpatch it first and feed > back in a few of the more important commands such as the > disassembler. I'm inclined to wait until the core gets accepted upstream. If that doesn't happen for 2.6.33, then I might start a separate kdb-5 tree that is the kdb/kgdb merge. mh |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | new kdb over kgdb, Joe Korty |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** ÐÐÐeÑeÐ ÐÐÑ ÐÐÑ Ðo cÐÑÐ ÐÐÑepÐeÑ ÐaÐy ÐaÐÐÑx ÐoÑÐÐÑÐÐÐÑÐÑx kÐÐÐÐÑÐÐ ÐÐÑ BÐÑeÐÐ ÐÐÐÐecÐ (BÑÐ kÐÐÑaÐÑÐÑÐ ÐÐÐÐÑe) ÐÑ ÐoÐÐÑÐ yÐÐÐÑÑ ÐÐÐpÐÐÐee ÐÐ ÑÐÐÐÑÐÐÑ: +79IÐ39I38Ð7, kdb |
| Previous by Thread: | new kdb over kgdb, Joe Korty |
| Next by Thread: | ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** ÐÐÐeÑeÐ ÐÐÑ ÐÐÑ Ðo cÐÑÐ ÐÐÑepÐeÑ ÐaÐy ÐaÐÐÑx ÐoÑÐÐÑÐÐÐÑÐÑx kÐÐÐÐÑÐÐ ÐÐÑ BÐÑeÐÐ ÐÐÐÐecÐ (BÑÐ kÐÐÑaÐÑÐÑÐ ÐÐÐÐÑe) ÐÑ ÐoÐÐÑÐ yÐÐÐÑÑ ÐÐÐpÐÐÐee ÐÐ ÑÐÐÐÑÐÐÑ: +79IÐ39I38Ð7, kdb |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |