Re: [PATCH 0/13] RFC ONLY - kdb for kgdb

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:15:39AM +0200, Louis Rilling wrote:
> Do you intend to support kdb modules? If yes, in which extent should they be
> adapted?

I think that would be a very low priority.  What would be useful is the
hack to load debuginfo into kdb so that it can pretty-print arbitrary
structures.  That alone would replace about 90% of the kdb modules I
think.

And yes, that code in current kdb is even more ugly than core kdb, so
it would need a major cleanup first.