| To: | Mitch Bradley <wmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] kdb: add rdmsr and wrmsr commands for i386 |
| From: | Bernardo Innocenti <bernie@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 May 2007 15:44:05 -0400 |
| Cc: | kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx, lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devel@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <46495C6F.1050207@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | http://www.codewiz.org/ |
| References: | <46494B99.2030502@xxxxxxxxxxx> <46495C6F.1050207@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | kdb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070504) |
Mitch Bradley wrote: > Bernardo Innocenti wrote: >> The syntax is: >> rdmsr <addr> >> wrmsr <addr> <l> <h> > > In the hardware documentation that I have seen, MSR values are > conventionally shown as 64-bit numbers. The <l> <h> ordering will make > it necessary to do a mental flip. The 32-bit pieces of MSR do not have > individual addresses, so considerations of endianness are not directly > relevant. I reveresed the order as you asked, but, honestly, I don't like it very much either way :-) Here's the patch again: |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] kdb: add rdmsr and wrmsr commands for i386 (take 3), Bernardo Innocenti |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: kdb: add rdmsr and wrmsr commands for i386, Bernardo Innocenti |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] kdb: add rdmsr and wrmsr commands for i386, Bernardo Innocenti |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] kdb: add rdmsr and wrmsr commands for i386 (take 3), Bernardo Innocenti |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |