On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 17:32 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 08:00:46AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> > On Sunday 26 March 2006 21:58, Peter Wainwright wrote:
> > > Is KDB still maintained for the x86_64 architecture? oss.sgi.com has
> > > x86_64 patches for kernel 2.6.14 but not for more recent
> > > kernels. I tried to forward-port it to 2.6.16 myself but it is
> > > not giving a proper backtrace (%rsp seems to be wrong at breakpoints).
> > >
> > > Peter Wainwright
> >
> > I would find it useful too. I've forward ported it as well, and also have
> > the
> > same backtrace problem. I guess it's probably simple to fix, but it doesn't
> > irk me enough that I've bothered to try to fix it.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Nigel
>
> Did you have the problem with the last patch, there was
> some backtrace changes that I accepted that I did not have
> time to test. It would be useful if you could check a before
> and after of that code.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jack
Sometime recently the following change occurred in
arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c:
- set_system_gate(3,&int3);
+ set_system_gate_ist(3,&int3,DEBUG_STACK); /* int3 can be called
from all */
The int3 handler now runs in a special interrupt stack using
the "long-mode interrupt-stack table".
So calculating the process %rsp from the address of the pt_regs
structure no longer works. How to figure out the address of the
original stack is something I haven't figured out yet because I
have no time to read the fine "AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual".
Peter
---------------------------
Use http://oss.sgi.com/ecartis to modify your settings or to unsubscribe.
|