keith wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 05:47, Kevin Stansell wrote:
>
>>>On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 15:39, Keith Owens wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:54:43 -0700,
>>> > keith <kmannth@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > >linux 2.6.7-bk4
>>> > >kdb-v4.4-2.6.7-common-1
>>> > >kdb-v4.4-2.6.7-i386-1
>>> > >
>>> > >My issue is as follows...
>>> > > If I don't enable kdb everything works fine. When I enable and boot
>>> > >with KDB I fall into kdb when I bring the secondary cpus online. KDB
>>> > >claims it was entered via an NMI. Without kdb there are no nmis being
>>> > >registered by the system.
>>> >
>>> > This debug patch should get you up and running, and tell you where the
>>> > nmi is coming from. Untested.
>>>
>>>Ok booted without kdb and I did not see that zone alignment error. Has
>>>kdb ran on a numa i386 system before? It looks to be tinkering with the
>>>VM somehow. Tomorrow I'll try disabling numa and seeing if things work.
>>
>>As a datapoint: I have ran KDB (with the 2.4 kernel) on a summit box in
>>the past with no problems.
>>
>
>
> Do you know if the CONFIG_NUMA options were set?
>
> Keith
>
>
Yes, with SLES8 the CONFIG_X86_NUMA option is set along with
CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT.
--
Sincerely,
Kevin Stansell
IBM Software Engineer
stanselk@xxxxxxxxxx (linux)
kstansel@xxxxxxxxxx (notes)
---------------------------
Use http://oss.sgi.com/ecartis to modify your settings or to unsubscribe.
|