| To: | linas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: KDB pop stack? |
| From: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Jul 2003 08:45:37 +1000 |
| Cc: | kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Mon, 21 Jul 2003 17:17:02 EST." <20030721171702.A48304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | kdb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 17:17:02 -0500, linas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >Maybe the newest version has the following feature: ability to >view registers as they 'would have been' if the stack were poped? Where are those registers stored? Working registers are overwritten. Preserved registers are saved somewhere on stack, but there is no defined place where they are stored. At least not on i386, ia64 has unwind data that says where preserved registers are saved, i386 is all ad-hoc storage with no way for kdb to tell where that storage is. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | KDB pop stack?, linas |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | eature--Single Step of KDB on xscale is on work, LIAO, GUANGDENG |
| Previous by Thread: | KDB pop stack?, linas |
| Next by Thread: | Re: KDB pop stack?, linas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |