Hi,
OK, thanks. I'll see what we can fix at this end.
BTW, KDB is great! It really makes debugging (which is all that I do
now) a whole lot easier. I dread having to debug a crash on a system
that doesn't have KDB on it.
--linas
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 11:49:58AM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 16:18:05 -0500,
> linas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >Anyway, here's a patch, it allows running tasks to be listed
> >on 64-but machines.
> >
> >Index: kdbsupport.c
> >===================================================================
> >RCS file: /home/linas/cvsroot/linux24/kdb/Attic/kdbsupport.c,v
> >retrieving revision 1.1.2.1
> >diff -u -r1.1.2.1 kdbsupport.c
> >--- kdbsupport.c 15 Jul 2003 18:43:51 -0000 1.1.2.1
> >+++ kdbsupport.c 17 Jul 2003 19:03:30 -0000
> >@@ -672,9 +672,9 @@
> > * none.
> > */
> >
> >-#define UNRUNNABLE (1 << (8*sizeof(unsigned long) - 1)) /*
> >unrunnable is < 0 */
> >-#define RUNNING (1 << (8*sizeof(unsigned long) - 2))
> >-#define TRACED (1 << (8*sizeof(unsigned long) - 3))
> >+#define UNRUNNABLE (1UL << (8*sizeof(unsigned long) - 1)) /*
> >unrunnable is < 0 */
> >+#define RUNNING (1UL << (8*sizeof(unsigned long) - 2))
> >+#define TRACED (1UL << (8*sizeof(unsigned long) - 3))
> >
> > unsigned long
> > kdb_task_state_string(int argc, const char **argv, const char **envp)
>
> You must be running off an old version of kdb. That was fixed around
> October 2002, in kdb v2.4.
>
|