| To: | kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Backtraces with interrupts or signals seem unreliable, anyone else seen this? |
| From: | Thomas Duffy <Thomas.Duffy.99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Jun 2003 19:45:40 -0700 |
| In-reply-to: | <7714.1055363806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <7714.1055363806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | kdb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 13:36, Keith Owens wrote: > Uggh, I hate top quoting on mailing lists. Of course, top quoting is what you like, top *posting* is what you hate :-) BTW, I agree with you Keith..in the immortal words of Nick Moffitt: A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? This is, unfortunately, a crusade we will never win. LookOut forces this bad behavior. -tduffy
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Backtraces with interrupts or signals seem unreliable, anyone else seen this?, Keith Owens |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Announce: kdb v4.3 is available for kernels 2.4.20, 2.4.21, Keith Owens |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Backtraces with interrupts or signals seem unreliable, anyone else seen this?, Keith Owens |
| Next by Thread: | Linux 2.5/2.6 support, glowell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |