kdb
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: strange pb

To: David Douard <douard@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: strange pb
From: Xavier Bru <Xavier.Bru@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:37:17 +0200 (DFT)
Cc: kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200207060202.12521.douard@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <200207060202.12521.douard@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx
I am not sure this is the same problem:

I had the problem on ia64 where there is a conflict between kdb and
ia64 patch.
It depends on the order we apply the patches:
        . kdb common patch then ia64 patch then kdb ia64 patch is OK.
        . ia64 patch then  kdb common patch & kdb ia64 patch: there is
        a reject in init/main.c that prevents the call to kdb_init()
        that file.

Xavier

David Douard writes:
 > Hi ! 
 > 
 > I'm not on the list so please CC me back.
 > 
 > I'm using a 2.4.18 kernel (on a PIII (compaq Evo N150)) with latest ACPI 
 > patches (well this is why I need kdb... there is a acpi kdb module).
 > 
 > I finally could compile everything, and when I hit the pause key, I go to 
 > kdb. 
 > It's fine BUT none standard commands are recognized !
 > So I cannot type "go" : still have "Unknown command"... Quite annoying. 
 > I've seen something similar in a mail from Xavier Bru (january 2002)...
 > Any kdb modules loaded are OK (acpi kdb seems to work fine. No intensive 
 > chech 
 > thou).
 > 
 > So do you think it is the same pb reported by X.Bru (no init() called). And 
 > is 
 > there a simple solution ?
 > 
 > Just a simple question (to which I can find the answer in the kernel, I 
 > know...) :
 > when is the kdb_init function called ? At boot or when entering kdb ? (I 
 > guess 
 > at boot. Ok my question is quite stupid...)
 > And then can I do debug printk in it ? (the awful debug method).
 > 
 > Thank you.
 > 
 > David Douard

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>