| To: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | suggestion: kdb modules to be static. |
| From: | Tigran Aivazian <tigran@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:01:58 +0000 (GMT) |
| Cc: | kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006020821100.1117-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi Keith, How about changing things so that the kdbm_vm/kdbm_pg (and any future modules) be compiled statically into the kernel? Surely you would agree that the _only_ reason to have them as modules is to be able to enhance kdb "on the fly" on a running system with some exotic custom kernel features with the constraint of not being allowed to reboot. This is probably a real-world situation in 0.0000% of the cases, so I would suggest making them static not just by default but always. But if you disagree, at least making this optional is, without a doubt, a good idea. Regards, Tigran |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | kdb 1.5 doesn't compile on linux kernel 2.4.0-test10, Joseph Cheek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: suggestion: kdb modules to be static., Keith Owens |
| Previous by Thread: | kdb 1.5 doesn't compile on linux kernel 2.4.0-test10, Joseph Cheek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: suggestion: kdb modules to be static., Keith Owens |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |