[Top] [All Lists]

suggestion: kdb modules to be static.

To: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: suggestion: kdb modules to be static.
From: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:01:58 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006020821100.1117-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Keith,

How about changing things so that the kdbm_vm/kdbm_pg (and any future
modules) be compiled statically into the kernel?

Surely you would agree that the _only_ reason to have them as modules is
to be able to enhance kdb "on the fly" on a running system with some
exotic custom kernel features with the constraint of not being allowed to
reboot. This is probably a real-world situation in 0.0000% of the cases,
so I would suggest making them static not just by default but always.

But if you disagree, at least making this optional is, without a doubt, a
good idea. 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>