kdb
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: kdb-v1.6 for 2.4.0-test11 ?

To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: kdb-v1.6 for 2.4.0-test11 ?
From: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 10:33:59 +1100
Cc: kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 20 Nov 2000 15:28:25 -0800." <3A19B399.7E11BA10@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 15:28:25 -0800, 
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I'm having compile errors with kdb-v1.6-2.4.0-test11-pre7...
>but I'm trying to use it on 2.4.0-test11.
>I haven't seen any traffic about this.
>Is kdb available for 2.4.0-test11?

Shortly, once I fix some problems.

>First error is in arch/kernel/i386/io-apic.c, line 1608,
>  x86_capability |= constant;
>needs to be
>  x86_capability[0] |= constant;

-       boot_cpu_data.x86_capability |= X86_FEATURE_APIC;
+       set_bit(X86_FEATURE_APIC, &boot_cpu_data.x86_capability);

>After this, arch/i386/kdb/i386-dis.c has a few errors (sample):
>
>gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/work/linsrc/240-test11/include -Wall
>-Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=i686   -c -o
>i386-dis.o i386-dis.c
>i386-dis.c: In function `print_insn_i386':
>i386-dis.c:2143: `bfd_mach_i386_i386_intel_syntax' undeclared (first use
>in this function)

Defined in /usr/include/bfd.h, mine is binutils-2.9.5.0.22-6.  The
disassembly code in kdb was upgraded to a recent gdb, you probably need
to upgrade binutils.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>