>>>>> "keith" == Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
keith> On 03 Oct 2000 03:21:09 +0200,
keith> "Juan J. Quintela" <quintela@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> using kbd-1.5 (final) with test9-pre9 I have got
>>
>> Enter <q> to end, <cr> to continue:
>> NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU1, regist: CPU: 1
>>
>> That happened while playing with the debugger in an SMP system. Could
>> be that you forgot to deactivate the NMI watchdog at kdb entry????
keith> The NMI watchdog is not deactivated. Instead there is a kdb state flag
keith> which says to ignore the NMI watchdog tick. This state bit is twiddled
keith> in several places, it is turned on in main kdb, it is turned off during
keith> a kdb command (to catch loops in commands), it should be turned on
keith> again when waiting for input. Looks like the state is incorrect.
keith> Which command did you issue that generated "Enter <q> to end, <cr> to
keith> continue:"?
bta, and yes I was trying to make sense for a backtrace (i.e. not
continuing pressing keys). This has worked for ages (i.e. kdb
1.[34]).
Later, Juan.
--
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they
are different -- Larry McVoy
|