kdb
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Planned availability of SGI kdb and lkcd in future 2.4 vendor dis tr

To: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Planned availability of SGI kdb and lkcd in future 2.4 vendor dis tributions
From: "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 00:54:54 +0200
Cc: Scott Lurndal <slurn@xxxxxxxxxxx>, kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <15416.968366992@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; from kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 09:49:52AM +1100
References: <200009072233.PAA27246@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <15416.968366992@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 09:49:52AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:

[...] 
> * The main kdb code itself increases the size of the kernel, although
>   this is swamped by the size of kallsyms.

* kdb increases the path lengths for hardware breakpoint debugging
(used heavily by things like ltrace) 

-Andi
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>