| To: | amit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Amit D Chaudhary) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Planned availability of SGI kdb and lkcd in future 2.4 vendor dis tributions |
| From: | Scott Lurndal <slurn@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Sep 2000 15:33:20 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Keith Owens), kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <000901c01915$e3238f60$d5a76496@xxxxxxxx> from "Amit D Chaudhary" at Sep 07, 2000 02:52:15 PM |
| Sender: | owner-kdb@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > >I am going to make one more try at persuading Linus to include > > kdb in the base kernel (2.4 only) but I don't expect to succeed. Then > > I plan to contact the distributors. > My own thinking is kdb is more of a development tool than part of the actual > kernel, but to ensure that all kernel developers know > and can use kdb, it should be part of GNU or all the major distributions. > > Amit > Being that there is no additional overhead (aside from some small number of kb of code) when KDB is included in a production kernel, it is nice to have on all the time - just in case the system does panic or hang due to a heisenbug. scott |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Planned availability of SGI kdb and lkcd in future 2.4 vendor dis tributions, Amit D Chaudhary |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Planned availability of SGI kdb and lkcd in future 2.4 vendor dis tributions, Keith Owens |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Planned availability of SGI kdb and lkcd in future 2.4 vendor dis tributions, Amit D Chaudhary |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Planned availability of SGI kdb and lkcd in future 2.4 vendor dis tributions, Keith Owens |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |