| To: | Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan <ananth@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: KAIO Version 1.2 released |
| From: | Christopher Smith <x@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 4 Mar 2000 16:40:44 -0800 |
| Cc: | kaio@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Comment: | I can't believe you're actually reading mail headers. |
| In-reply-to: | <38C14988.725B31B6@xxxxxxx>; from ananth@xxxxxxx on Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 09:36:08AM -0800 |
| Mail-followup-to: | Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan <ananth@xxxxxxx>, kaio@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <38C14988.725B31B6@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-kaio@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.1.8i |
On Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 09:36:08AM -0800, Ananth Anathanarayanan wrote: > I've uploaded version 1.2 of the kaio kernel patch > and the corresponding library. The current patches > are for the 2.2 kernel. Soon I'll release 1.2 patches > for the 2.3 kernel. Please check "news" and > "download/README.patches" from the main project page. > > As always please don't hesitate to send your feedback! The "news" section was pretty thin and only mentions that the kernel lock isn't used as much and there was some cleanup of unused portions of the patch. The README.patches only says there were "extensive" changes (although it does give me credit for the helping to identify and provide a test case for the 1.1 socket patch --thanks! ;-). Is this about all that makes sense or is they're something more? --Chris |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | KAIO Version 1.2 released, Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: KAIO Version 1.2 released, Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan |
| Previous by Thread: | KAIO Version 1.2 released, Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: KAIO Version 1.2 released, Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |