info-inventor
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: OpenInventor with OpenMotif

To: info-inventor@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: OpenInventor with OpenMotif
From: Robert Hartley <rhartley@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 10:30:01 -0500
Organization: ICS
References: <5.0.2.1.0.20010301170450.0278f720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-inventor@xxxxxxxxxxx
Olli Seppala wrote:

> We are porting Inventor code to Linux with OpenInventor. The FAQ suggests
> using Lesstif, but now that OpenMotif is available, can we use that?

Yes, it has been done.  If you check the list archives, you will see that
partly because Motif source is easily available, there was a bug fixed in it.

> Our initial attempts have gotten hung up on the lack of libXm.so.1 on the
> system when Lesstif is not installed.

That should not be a problem if building Inventor from source.

You can work your way around this by creating a soft link from the Motif
libXm.so to the Lesstif one.

> And naturally OpenMotif and Lesstif cannot easily coexist.

Actually, it is easy, and they do.

Just set your LD_LIBRARY_PATH to point at which ever one you want, and if you
wish, you can also set the directory order to search in your /etc/ld.so.conf

I use the same tricks when switching versions of Motif from 1.2 <-> 2.1 and
versions of OpenGL/Mesa.

> We'd like to use OpenMotif as the recent open release of ViewKit requires it
> instead of Lesstif.

Sounds good, it works for us.



Good luck!

Robert


--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=  Robert Hartley                 Mail:         201 Broadway        =
=  Central Region Systems Engineer              Cambridge, MA 02139 =
=  Integrated Computer            Email:        rhartley@xxxxxxx    =
=  Solutions, Inc.                Web Site:     www.ics.com         =
=  Tech Support: support@xxxxxxx  Phone:        800-800-4271        =
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Visit the MotifZone (www.motifzone.org) for info on Motif!




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>