info-inventor-dev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Segfault bug in SoBlinker

To: info-inventor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Segfault bug in SoBlinker
From: Ben Wong <benjamin.wong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 05:00:49 -0400 (EDT)
In-reply-to: <002501c1f287$b20d3000$dedfdacf@sugarlan2pa6cc> (mattverona@xxxxxxx)
References: <200205030838.EAA331452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <002501c1f287$b20d3000$dedfdacf@sugarlan2pa6cc>
Sender: owner-info-inventor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> "Matt" == Matt Verona <mattverona@xxxxxxx> writes:

    Matt> Howdy Ben... I think that Inventor has always had this
    Matt> "feature"... i.e., you must always initialize the Inventor
    Matt> database by calling the static SoDB::init() method, before
    Matt> creating nodes, like SoBlinker, etc....

    Matt> See page 36 of "The Inventor Mentor":

Ah. Thanks for the help. (And thanks to all the other people who
responded).

You are right; the man page for SoDB is quite explicit that
SoDB::Init() should be called before constructing any nodes.

It doesn't appear that the man pages for any of the nodes mention
their dependence on SoDB. It seems that such a critical relationship
would warrant a few words, perhaps in the "See Also" section. Is there
a place to submit bug reports for the documentation?

        Ben

--
Benjamin Wong                           College of Computing and GVU
benjamin.wong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx             Georgia Institute of Technology
Ph.D. Student                           Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0280



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>