fam
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: sourceforge and 2.6.10

To: "Viner, David" <dviner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: sourceforge and 2.6.10
From: Joerg Wendland <joergland@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 20:13:54 +0100
Cc: "'fam@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <fam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <263A1F717ECDED40AA969F98D1CF122E01A4F36E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <263A1F717ECDED40AA969F98D1CF122E01A4F36E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: fam-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
David,

Viner, David, on 2004-03-10, 08:47, you wrote:
> It seems like no development is happening against the 2.7.0 codebase that's
> currently in sourceforge. However, I think we've seen two or three patches
> to 2.6.10.  I think we should remove the code in sourceforge now, commit the
> 2.6.10 codebase, apply the patches (e.g., dnotify), and publish a 2.6.11.  

That's not true.  Since I am the maintainer of fam Debian packages I
have some patches against 2.7 in use that were ported from 2.6.10,
including the DNotify patch.  I am currently working with the upstream
maintainer to integrate these patches.  Please stay tuned...

Joerg

-- 
Joerg "joergland" Wendland
GPG: 51CF8417 FP: 79C0 7671 AFC7 315E 657A  F318 57A3 7FBD 51CF 8417

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>