fam
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2

To: bench@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: FAM 2.7.0-pre2
From: Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 24 Nov 2003 09:12:23 +0100
Cc: Michael Raymond <mraymond@xxxxxxx>, fam@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1069527846.1638.352.camel@purple>
References: <20031121155043.F151992@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3FBE93BD.ACA3CAC6@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200311212033.01253.steleman@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031122122722.A172698@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1069527846.1638.352.camel@purple>
Sender: fam-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 20:04, Ben wrote:
> well, if we're open to suggestions.... :)
> 
> The biggest thing that's kept me from using FAM in the past has been the
> way FAM handles moves: it tells you a file was removed and another one
> was created, but not that they are the same file. For keeping tabs on
> where files are in a file system, that makes it pretty hard to do it
> with 100% accuracy.

This isn't the fault of fam really. It depends on what information the
kernel give you about changes.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
                   alexl@xxxxxxxxxx    alla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
He's a jaded Catholic romance novelist trapped in a world he never made. She's 
a hard-bitten gypsy barmaid living on borrowed time. They fight crime! 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>