fam
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: fam error "failed to accept new client"

To: fam@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: fam error "failed to accept new client"
From: Joel Baxter <jbaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 18:56:37 -0700
In-reply-to: <200305191036.17936.michael.wardle@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3EC80F8E.900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3EC81C5E.70704@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200305191036.17936.michael.wardle@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: jbaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: fam-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030304
Thanks for the response. Just to finish this off: it was indeed the xinetd version that was the culprit. I now have FAM running OK as built from the 2.6.7 source RPM.

In fact using the binary RPM turned out to be a problem of a different sort. None of the RedHat binary RPMs for FAM include the static library libfam.a, and at least one of the many configure scripts in the Courier IMAP build actually checks for the existence of libfam.a at one point, as part of a does-FAM-exist sequence. (Even though, as far as I can tell, only the dynamic library is actually used by the compile end products.) So that wasn't good. Rather than hacking at the config scripts to make them get the correct answer, I thought I'd try going back to the source builds, so that libfam.a would exist, and all seems to be well.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>