fam
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ANN: Python FAM

To: Robert Sander <gurubert-dated-1043879289.cekoekpj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ANN: Python FAM
From: Michael Wardle <michael.wardle@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:20:49 +1100
Cc: fam@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <news2mail-slrnb3gllg.m2l.gurubert-dated-1043879289.cekoekpj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Adacel Technologies
References: <slrnaonc0s.v91.gurubert-dated-1032564647.dmchlcpd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <news2mail-slrnb3gllg.m2l.gurubert-dated-1043879289.cekoekpj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: michael.wardle@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: fam-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.5
On Thursday, January 30, 2003 09:33, Robert Sander wrote:
> I would like to take the opportunity and would like to ask for two
> things:
>
> - Please, could the sentence
>
>   "hostname is an obsolete field. Don't use it in your applications."
>
>   from
> http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?coll=0650&db=bks&fna
>me=/SGI_Developer/books/IIDsktp_IG/sgi_html/ch08.html be included in the
> manual page fam(3)?

Could you please elaborate why you would like this?  Is this perhaps because 
the hostname member does not always contain a valid value?  Under what 
circumstances does this occur?

I suspect the hostname field is quite useful if FAM is working as expected and 
the file being monitored is on a remote NFS share.

> - Could someone please add a link to python-fam on the links section of
>   the FAM homepage, that would be nice. Thanks.

Done.

-- 
Michael Wardle
Adacel Technologies



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>