| To: | fam@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [fam] fam / imon linux 2.4.10 |
| From: | Nathan Thompson-Amato <nathan.thompson-amato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Oct 2001 12:01:22 -0400 |
| Organization: | D.N. American |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110101116280.776-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-fam@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010917 |
Alex Larsson wrote: Why do people continue to work on the imon patch? In what way do you think the current Linux directory notification is inadequate? (Except being a horrible interface, but that is all hidden by fam.) I didn't even know FAM supported dnotify. Is code for this in the official releases, or is there just a patch available? The gist of the webpage seems to be that IMON and polling are viable options but that hacking dnotify support into FAM can't happen without breaking interfaces and/or introducing a few more-or-less unfixable bugs. Have things changed? Nathan -- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe fam | mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [fam] fam / imon linux 2.4.10, John Gluck |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [fam] fam / imon linux 2.4.10, Jerome De Greef |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [fam] fam / imon linux 2.4.10, Alex Larsson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [fam] fam / imon linux 2.4.10, Alex Larsson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |