fam
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [fam] fam &imon &linux & KDE :-)

To: rusty@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [fam] fam &imon &linux & KDE :-)
From: raster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 17:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bastian@xxxxxxx, fam@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <10004031636.ZM21245@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: raster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-fam@xxxxxxxxxxx
On  3 Apr, Rusty Ballinger scribbled:
->  > If you need any help with the linux kernel support part I can try to see
->  > if there are any kernel hackers around at SuSE who want to help you out.
->  
->  That would be great!  Any help would be appreciated.  There are patches
->  which "mostly" work, but the way they hook into the kernel's fs code is
->  ugly.  There are notes at http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/imon.txt (that
->  file is also included in the patches).
->  
->  One thing those notes don't include is Andrew Morton's idea of separating
->  the start- & stop-exec events from the rest of the imon patch.  (That's
->  the new fields added to the inode and task_struct, and the accounting in
->  fs/exec.c, kernel/exit.c, and kernel/fork.c.)
->  
->  I still haven't posted a request for comments etc. on linux-kernel yet;
->  I was hoping to have a working 2.3.99-preX version first, but my first
->  quick attempt was broken.

actually a question.. is imon at all destined to become part of the
base kernel sometime (maybe 2.5 devel series) ? i got this question
from E users after i nicely informed them they'll need fam from now on..
:)

-- 
--------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    raster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx     raster@xxxxxxxxxxx
                                    raster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx raster@xxxxxxxxx
                                    raster@xxxxxxxxxx


--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe fam | mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>