devfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SCSI Tapes and devfs

To: devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SCSI Tapes and devfs
From: "brett holcomb" <brettholcomb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 13:18:57 -0500
In-reply-to: <20030120172300.23455.qmail@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: devfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Yes, it's an Initio A100u2w and the support is built into the kernel.

On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 01:23:00 +0800
 "Marton Kadar" <marton.kadar@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
You again phrase it in a way that gives me doubts.

The SCSI _host_adapter_ support is ONE element in the kernel.
The SCSI _tape_ support is ANOTHER.

These two, the host adapter and the tape drive, are also two very distinct pieces of hardware in your box.

You can have host adapter support without tape support. Are you sure it is not the case?

Marton
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brett I. Holcomb" <brettholcomb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 22:07:14 -0500
To: devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SCSI Tapes and devfs

I double checked - the SCSI adapter is built into the kernel so it's not
a question of the module not loading.


On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:27:32 +0300
Borzenkov Andrey <Andrey.Borzenkov@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  In the case
> > of st being a module and me loading it at startup time > > causes devfs to see it. But what SHOULD trigger this if
> > the st support is built into a kernel - what is the
> > mechanism there for Linux?
> > > > The same modulo bugs. St's attach should run in exactly the same > fashion and register tape (if found). Are you sure you have not built > driver for your SCSI adapter as module? Then when st is initialized at > boot time it can't find any tapes because there is no adapter yet. > This would perfectly explain why tape was not there initially but
> appeared later (due to module autoloading).


--

Brett I. Holcomb



--
__________________________________________________________
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

Meet Singles
http://corp.mail.com/lavalife



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>