devfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Newbie question: running devfsd forces implicit mount of /proc?

To: "David Gilbert" <ad_gilbert@xxxxxxxxxxx>, devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Newbie question: running devfsd forces implicit mount of /proc?
From: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 21:09:41 +0200
In-reply-to: <F1142A1IkleVNnZYe6C00013c2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <F1142A1IkleVNnZYe6C00013c2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 19:38, David Gilbert wrote:
> I've just started playing around with devfs and encountered an odd thing
> (to me anyway)...
>
> Once running, I noticed errors from the init scripts about trying to mount
> /proc. I've disabled the explict mount of /proc to work around the problem.
> But what's going on? It seems that once devfsd is running there is an
> implicit mounting of /proc? Is this normal behaviour?

You don't mention which distribution you're using, it's probably a 
distribution issue.

My start script for Debian mounts /proc because that's the only way to 
determine whether it's already running.

Why is this a problem?

-- 
I do not get viruses because I do not use MS software.
If you use Outlook then please do not put my email address in your
address-book so that WHEN you get a virus it won't use my address in the
>From field.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>