devfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Distributions for devfs

To: Richard Gooch <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Distributions for devfs
From: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 01:20:56 +0200
Cc: chippo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200204212314.g3LNEKx24648@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3CC28C58.9DCA77C3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020421101000.9A496CA5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200204212314.g3LNEKx24648@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 01:14, Richard Gooch wrote:
> > Debian/woody has good devfs support.
> >
> > I fix most bugs that are reported against devfsd in <24 hours.  I've
> > checked out many other Debian packages and filed bug reports where
> > they didn't work well with devfs.
> >
> > Richard, has anyone from any other major distribution sent you more
> > patches than I did?
>
> I haven't counted. I've gotten a fair number of patches from the
> Mandrake people as well.

The Mandrake people are pretty good.  It's a good second choice.  ;)

-- 
If you send email to me or to a mailing list that I use which has >4 lines
of legalistic junk at the end then you are specifically authorizing me to do
whatever I wish with the message and all other messages from your domain, by
posting the message you agree that your long legalistic sig is void.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>