devfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Distributions for devfs

To: chippo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Distributions for devfs
From: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 12:09:59 +0200
In-reply-to: <3CC28C58.9DCA77C3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3CC28C58.9DCA77C3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-devfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:54, Chris the Elder wrote:
> I apologise if this has been discussed before; since my devfs
> installation has been working for years, I haven't concentrated on the
> mailing list much.
>
> Are there any full-ish distributions that come with devfs by default?
>
> I found the 'Rock' distribution had devfs by default, but it wasn't full
> enough for me.  Part of the reason that I get a distribution, is that
> I'm too lazy (or old) to configure assorted hardware and install
> software by hand anymore.

Debian/woody has good devfs support.

I fix most bugs that are reported against devfsd in <24 hours.  I've checked 
out many other Debian packages and filed bug reports where they didn't work 
well with devfs.

Richard, has anyone from any other major distribution sent you more patches 
than I did?

-- 
If you send email to me or to a mailing list that I use which has >4 lines
of legalistic junk at the end then you are specifically authorizing me to do
whatever I wish with the message and all other messages from your domain, by
posting the message you agree that your long legalistic sig is void.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>